Pruett-MillerSM.It's CRISPR clear: off-target study misses the mark. CRISPR J, 2018; 1:130–131. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2018.29013.mil.
2.
KosickiM, TombergK, BradleyA.Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR-Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements. Nat Biotech, 2018Jul16 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4192.
3.
BirlingMC, SchaefferL, AndréP, et al.. Efficient and rapid generation of large genomic variants in rats and mice using CRISMERE. Sci Rep, 2017; 7:43331. DOI: 10.1038/srep43331.
4.
CodnerGF, MiannéJ, CaulderA, et al.Application of long single-stranded DNA donors in genome editing: generation and validation of mouse mutants. BMC Biol, 2018; 16:70. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0530-7.
5.
ShinHY, WangC, LeeHK, et al.CRISPR/Cas9 targeting events cause complex deletions and insertions at 17 sites in the mouse genome. Nat Commun, 2017; 8:15464. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15464.
6.
BoroviakK, DoeB, BanerjeeR, et al.Chromosome engineering in zygotes with CRISPR/Cas9. Genesis, 2016; 54:78–85. DOI: 10.1002/dvg.22915.
7.
KomorAC, KimYB, PackerMS, et al.Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature, 2016; 533:420–424. DOI: 10.1038/nature17946.
8.
GreenfieldA.Carry on editing. Br Med Bull, 2018; 1–9. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldy020.
