Solidarity in the Age of CRISPR

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Mathews

, Chan

, Donovan

, et al. CRISPR: a path through the thicket. Nature, 2015; 527:159–161. DOI: 10.1038/527159a.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Human Genome Editing: Science, Ethics, and Governance, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2017.

Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Genome Editing and Human Reproduction: Social and Ethical Issues. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2018.

Brokowski

Do CRISPR germline ethics statements cut it?. CRISPR J, 2018; 1:115–125. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2017.0024.

OECD. Inequality. Available online at www.oecd.org/social/inequality.htm (accessed July 26, 2018).

Burall

Rethink public engagement for gene editing. Nature, 2018; 555:438–439. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-03269-3.

Hurlbut

, Jasanoff

, Saha

, et al. Building capacity for a global genome editing observatory: conceptual challenges. Trends Biotech, 2018; 36:639–641. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.009.

Montoliu

, Merchant

, Hirsch

, et al. ARRIGE arrives: toward the responsible use of genome editing. CRISPR J, 2018; 1:128–130. DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2018.29012.mon.