Abstract
The recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled the development of effective high-throughput noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) assays for fetal genetic abnormalities using maternal circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA). An important NIPS quality assurance is quantifying the fetal proportion of the sampled ccfDNA. For methods using allelic read count ratios from targeted sequencing of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), systematic biases and errors may reduce accuracy and diminish assay performance. We collected ccfDNA NIPS MiSeq sequencing data from an amplicon-based 92 SNP panel along with complementary low-depth whole-genome sequencing (WGS) on 243 normal male fetus pregnancies along with additional 144 nonpregnant female donor samples. Using fetal fraction estimates based on X and Y chromosome WGS coverage as gold standard, we compared an existing SNP-based approach, FetalQuant, to a more flexible Bayesian hierarchical modeling strategy that borrows information across interrogated SNPs to character SNP-level error rates and biases to improve fetal fraction estimates. Posterior distributions for SNP-level model parameters indicate most SNPs exhibited modest to moderate extrabinomial variation and a consistent underrepresentation of fetal alleles, with some extreme outliers in both regards. Fetal fraction estimates using FetalQuant, naive to these SNP properties, were relatively poor (
R
2 = 0.14, root mean squared error [RMSE] = 0.050), particularly when the true fetal fraction was low (<5%). In contrast, by quantifying SNP-level biases and error rates, our proposed approach demonstrated improved performance by reducing the bias and variability in fetal fraction estimates (
R
2 = 0.794, RMSE = 0.025). Using high-depth targeted SNP sequencing data, we identified a high degree of variability in distributional properties across SNP allelic read counts. These results highlight the benefits of leveraging hierarchical modeling for SNP-based fetal quantification assays (FQAs) and the need to properly calibrate FQAs dependent on NGS allelic ratio data.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
0.00 MB
1.70 MB