Urban elementary schools in minority communities with high obesity prevalence may have limited resources for physical education (PE) to achieve daily activity recommendations. Little is known whether integrating physical activity (PA) into classrooms can increase activity levels of students attending such schools.
Methods:
We conducted a cluster randomized, controlled trial among kindergarten and first-grade students from four Bronx, New York, schools to determine feasibility and impact of a classroom-based intervention on students' PA levels. Students in two intervention schools received the Children's Hospital at Montefiore Joining Academics and Movement (CHAM JAM), an audio CD consisting of 10-minute, education-focused aerobic activities led by teachers three times a day. PA was objectively measured by pedometer. Each subject wore a sealed pedometer during the 6-hour school day for 5 consecutive days at baseline (Time 1) and 8 weeks postintervention (Time 2). Hierarchical linear models were fit to evaluate differences in mean number of steps between the two groups.
Results:
A total of 988 students participated (intervention group, n=500; control group, n=488). There was no significant difference at baseline between the two groups on mean number of steps (2581 [standard deviation (SD), 1284] vs. 2476 [SD, 1180]; P=0.71). Eight weeks post–CHAM JAM, intervention group students took significantly greater mean number of steps than controls (2839 [SD, 1262] vs. 2545 [SD, 1153]; P=0.0048) after adjusting for baseline number of steps and other covariates (grade, gender, recess, and PE class). CHAM JAM was equally effective in gender, grade level, and BMI subgroups.
Conclusions:
CHAM JAM significantly increased school-based PA among kindergarten and first-grade students in inner-city schools. This approach holds promise as a cost-effective means to integrate the physical and cognitive benefits of PA into high-risk schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OgdenCL, CarrollMD, KitBK, et al.Prevalence of obesity and trends in body mass index among US children and adolescents, 1999–2010. JAMA, 2012; 307:483–490.
2.
ReznikM, Wylie-RosettJ, KimM, et al.Physical activity during school in urban minority kindergarten and first-grade students. Pediatrics, 2013; 131:e81–e87.
3.
FreedmanDS, KhanLK, DietzWH, et al.Relationship of childhood obesity to coronary heart disease risk factors in adulthood: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics, 2001; 108:712–718.
4.
FreedmanDS, KhanLK, SerdulaMK, et al.The relation of childhood BMI to adult adiposity: The Bogalusa Heart Study. Pediatrics, 2005; 115:22–27.
5.
WarburtonDE, NicolCW, BredinSS. Health benefits of physical activity: The evidence. CMAJ, 2006; 174:801–809.
6.
AndersenLB, HarroM, SardinhaLB, et al.Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: A cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lancet, 2006; 368:299–304.
7.
MetzgerJS, CatellierDJ, EvensonKR, et al.Patterns of objectively measured physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2008; 40:630–638.
8.
Whitt-GloverMC, TaylorWC, FloydMF, et al.Disparities in physical activity and sedentary behaviors among US children and adolescents: Prevalence, correlates, and intervention implications. J Public Health Policy, 2009; 30(Suppl 1):S309–S334.
9.
SinghGK, YuSM, SiahpushM, et al.High levels of physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors among US immigrant children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 2008; 162:756–763.
10.
Barr-AndersonDJ, Neumark-SztainerD, SchmitzKH, et al.But I like PE: Factors associated with enjoyment of physical education class in middle school girls. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2008; 79:18–27.
11.
FaithMS, LeoneMA, AyersTS, et al.Weight criticism during physical activity, coping skills, and reported physical activity in children. Pediatrics, 2002; 110:e23.
12.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. School health guidelines to promote healthy eating and physical activity. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2011; 60:1–76.
SaulnyS. Schools pushing for exercise, even without a place to play. The New York Times. November11, 2004. Available at www.nytimes.com/2004/11/11/nyregion/11gym.html Last accessed July1, 2014.
15.
MorganPJ, HansenV. Classroom teachers' perceptions of the impact of barriers to teaching physical education on the quality of physical education programs. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2008; 79:506–516.
16.
Task Force on Community Preventive Services. Recommendations to increase physical activity in communities. Am J Prev Med, 2002; 22(4 Suppl):67–72.
17.
HubertyJ, DinkelD, ColemanJ, et al.The role of schools in children's physical activity participation: Staff perceptions. Health Educ Res, 2012; 27:986–995.
18.
DobbinsM, HussonH, DeCorbyK, et al.School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013; 2:CD007651.
19.
SacchettiR, CecilianiA, GarulliA, et al.Effects of a 2-year school-based intervention of enhanced physical education in the primary school. J Sch Health, 2013; 83:639–646.
20.
TsaiPY, BoonplengW, McElmurryBJ, et al.Lessons learned in using TAKE 10! with Hispanic children. J Sch Nurs, 2009; 25:163–172.
21.
EatherN, MorganPJ, LubansDR. Improving the fitness and physical activity levels of primary school children: Results of the Fit-4-Fun group randomized controlled trial. Prev Med, 2013; 56:12–19.
22.
ErwinHE, BeighleA, MorganCF, et al.Effect of a low-cost, teacher-directed classroom intervention on elementary students' physical activity. J Sch Health, 2011; 81:455–461.
23.
DonnellyJE, GreeneJL, GibsonCA, et al.Physical Activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC): A randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity and diminish overweight and obesity in elementary school children. Prev Med, 2009; 49:336–341.
24.
KatzDL, CushmanD, ReynoldsJ, et al.Putting physical activity where it fits in the school day: Preliminary results of the ABC (Activity Bursts in the Classroom) for fitness program. Prev Chronic Dis, 2010; 7:A82.
25.
de MeijJS, ChinapawMJ, van StralenMM, et al.Effectiveness of JUMP-in, a Dutch primary school-based community intervention aimed at the promotion of physical activity. Br J Sports Med, 2011; 45:1052–1057.
26.
JurgME, KremersSP, CandelMJ, et al.A controlled trial of a school-based environmental intervention to improve physical activity in Dutch children: JUMP-in, kids in motion. Health Promot Int, 2006; 21:320–330.
TAKE 10! Program. Available at www.take10.net Last accessed July1, 2014.
29.
RatelS, LazaarN, DoreE, et al.High-intensity intermittent activities at school: Controversies and facts. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2004; 44:272–280.
30.
RowlandsAV, EstonRG. Comparison of accelerometer and pedometer measures of physical activity in boys and girls, ages 8–10 years. Res Q Exerc Sport, 2005; 76:251–257.
31.
TrostSG. Objective measurement of physical activity in youth: Current issues, future directions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2001; 29:32–36.
32.
PagelsP, BoldemannC, RaustorpA. Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of physical activity during preschool time on 3- to 5-year-old children. Acta Paediatr, 2011; 100:116–120.
33.
VincentSD, SidmanCL. Determining measurement error in digital pedometers. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci, 2003; 7:19–24.
34.
Tudor-LockeC. Taking steps toward increase physical activity: Using pedometers to measure and motivate. Res Digest, 2002; 3:1–8.
35.
GlasgowRE, VogtTM, BolesSM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health, 1999; 89:1322–1327.
HeoM, LeonAC. Statistical power and sample size requirements for three level hierarchical cluster rrandomized trials. Biometrics, 2008; 64:1256–1262.
38.
CampbellMK, ElbourneDR, AltmanDG, et al.CONSORT statement: Extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ, 2004; 328:702–708.
39.
StewartJA, DennisonDA, KohlHW, et al.Exercise level and energy expenditure in the TAKE 10! in-class physical activity program. J Sch Health, 2004; 74:397–400.
40.
PangraziRP, BeighleA, VehigeT, et al.Impact of Promoting Lifestyle Activity for Youth (PLAY) on children's physical activity. J Sch Health, 2003; 73:317–321.
41.
MaharMT, RoweDA, KennyRK, et al.Evaluation of the Take 10! classroom-based physical activity program. Med Sci Sport Exerc, 2003; 35:S135.
LoucaidesCA, JagoR. Differences in physical activity by gender, weight status and travel mode to school in Cypriot children. Prev Med, 2008; 47:107–111.
44.
KlinkerCD, SchipperijnJ, ChristianH, et al.Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children's school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2014; 11:8.
45.
StrattonG, RidgersND, FaircloughSJ, et al.Physical activity levels of normal-weight and overweight girls and boys during primary school recess. Obesity (Silver Spring), 2007; 15:1513–1519.
46.
Tudor-LockeC, PangraziRP, CorbinCB, et al.BMI-referenced standards for recommended pedometer-determined steps/day in children. Prev Med, 2004; 38:857–864.
47.
City of New York Office of the Comptroller. Audit report on the Department of Education's compliance with the physical education regulations in elementary schools. MD11-083A. October4, 2011. Available at http://comptroller.nyc.gov Last accessed July1, 2014.
RidgersND, StrattonG, FaircloughSJ. Physical activity levels of children during school playtime. Sports Med, 2006; 36:359–371.
50.
GibsonCA, SmithBK, DuboseKD, et al.Physical activity across the curriculum: Year one process evaluation results. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act, 2008; 5:36.
51.
SchneiderM, HallWJ, HernandezAE, et al.Rationale, design and methods for process evaluation in the HEALTHY study. Int J Obes (Lond), 2009; 33(Suppl 4):S60–S67.
52.
WrightK, GigerJN, NorrisK, et al.Impact of a nurse-directed, coordinated school health program to enhance physical activity behaviors and reduce body mass index among minority children: A parallel-group, randomized control trial. Int J Nurs Stud, 2013; 50:727–737.
