Accumulation of cerebral amyloid-β (Aβ) is a risk factor for cognitive decline and defining feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aβ is implicated in brain network disruption, but the extent to which these changes correspond with observable cognitive deficits in pre-clinical AD has not been tested. This study utilized individual-specific functional parcellations to sensitively evaluate the relationship between network connectivity and cognition in adults with and without Aβ deposition.
Participants and Methods:
Cognitively unimpaired adults ages 45–85 completed amyloid positron emission tomography, resting-state-functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and neuropsychological tests of episodic memory and executive function (EF). Participants in the upper tertile of mean standard uptake value ratio were considered Aβ+ (n = 50) while others were Aβ− (n = 99). Individualized functional network parcellations were generated from resting-state fMRI data. We examined the effects of group, network, and group-by-network interactions on memory and EF.
Results:
We observed several interactions such that within the Aβ+ group, preserved network integrity (i.e., greater connectivity within specific networks) was associated with better cognition, whereas network desegregation (i.e., greater connectivity between relative to within networks) was associated with worse cognition. This dissociation was most apparent for cognitive networks (frontoparietal, dorsal and ventral attention, limbic, and default mode), with connectivity relating to EF in the Aβ+ group specifically.
Conclusions:
Using an innovative approach to constructing individual-specified resting-state functional connectomes, we were able to detect differences in brain-cognition associations in pre-clinical AD. Our findings provide novel insight into specific functional network alterations occurring in the presence of Aβ that relate to cognitive function in asymptomatic individuals.
Impact statement
Elevated cerebral amyloid-β is a biomarker of pre-clinical Alzheimer's disease (AD). Associations between amyloidosis, functional network disruption, and cognitive impairment are evident in the later stages of AD, but these effects have not been substantiated in pre-clinical AD. Using individual-specific parcellations that maximally localize functional networks, we identify network alterations that relate to cognition in pre-clinical AD that have not been previously reported. We demonstrate that these effects localize to networks implicated in cognition. Our findings suggest that there may be subtle, amyloid-related alterations in the functional connectome that are detectable in pre-clinical AD, with potential implications for cognition in asymptomatic individuals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BadhwarA, TamA, DansereauC, et al.Resting-state network dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit, 2017; 8:73–85.
2.
BakerJE, LimYY, PietrzakRH, et al.Cognitive impairment and decline in cognitively normal older adults with high amyloid-β: A meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement Amst Neth, 2017; 6:108–121; doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2016.09.002
3.
BenitezA, JensenJH, ThornK, et al.Greater diffusion restriction in white matter in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol, 2022; 91(6):864–877; doi: 10.1002/ana.26353
4.
BesserL, KukullW, KnopmanDS, et al.Version 3 of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 2018; 32(4):351–358.
5.
BrennanBP, WangD, LiM, et al.Use of an individual-level approach to identify cortical connectivity biomarkers in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging, 2019; 4(1):27–38; doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.07.014
6.
BrierMR, ThomasJB, SnyderAZ, et al.Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer's disease progression. J Neurosci, 2012; 32(26):8890–8899; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5698-11.2012
7.
BuckleyRF, SchultzAP, HeddenT, et al.Functional network integrity presages cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 2017; 89(1):29–37; doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004059
8.
BucknerRL, Andrews-HannaJR, SchacterDL. The brain's default network. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 2008; 1124(1):1–38; doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011
9.
BucknerRL, SepulcreJ, TalukdarT, et al.Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: Mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci, 2009; 29(6):1860–1873; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009
10.
BucknerRL, SnyderAZ, ShannonBJ, et al.Molecular, structural, and functional characterization of Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for a relationship between default activity, amyloid, and memory. J Neurosci, 2005; 25(34):7709–7717; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2177-05.2005
11.
ChanMY, ParkDC, SavaliaNK, et al.Decreased segregation of brain systems across the healthy adult lifespan. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014; 111(46):E4997–E5006; doi: 10.1073/pnas.1415122111
12.
ChhatwalJP, SchultzAP, JohnsonKA, et al.Preferential degradation of cognitive networks differentiates Alzheimer's disease from ageing. Brain, 2018; 141(5):1486–1500.
13.
ClarkCM, SchneiderJA, BedellBJ, et al.Use of florbetapir-PET for imaging β-amyloid pathology. JAMA, 2011; 305(3):275–283; doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.2008
14.
DennisEL, ThompsonPM. Functional brain connectivity using fMRI in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychol Rev, 2014; 24:49–62; doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9249-6
15.
DongJW, JelescuIO, Ades-AronB, et al.Diffusion MRI biomarkers of white matter microstructure vary nonmonotonically with increasing cerebral amyloid deposition. Neurobiol Aging, 2020; 89:118–128; doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.01.009
16.
DrzezgaA, BeckerJA, Van DijkKRA, et al.Neuronal dysfunction and disconnection of cortical hubs in non-demented subjects with elevated amyloid burden. Brain J Neurol, 2011; 134(Pt 6):1635–1646; doi: 10.1093/brain/awr066
17.
EavaniH, HabesM, SatterthwaiteTD, et al.Heterogeneity of structural and functional imaging patterns of advanced brain aging revealed via machine learning methods. Neurobiol Aging, 2018; 71:41–50; doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.06.013
18.
ElmanJA, MadisonCM, BakerSL, et al.Effects of beta-amyloid on resting state functional connectivity within and between networks reflect known patterns of regional vulnerability. Cereb Cortex, 2016; 26(2):695–707; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu259
19.
EylerLT, ElmanJA, HattonSN, et al.Resting state abnormalities of the default mode network in mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis JAD, 2019; 70(1):107–120; doi: 10.3233/JAD-180847
20.
FanY-S, LiH, GuoJ, et al.Tracking positive and negative symptom improvement in first-episode Schizophrenia treated with risperidone using individual-level functional connectivity. Brain Connect, 2022; 12(5):454–464; doi: 10.1089/brain.2021.0061
FranzmeierN, CaballeroMÁA, TaylorANW, et al.Resting-state global functional connectivity as a biomarker of cognitive reserve in mild cognitive impairment. Brain Imaging Behav, 2017; 11(2):368–382; doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9599-1
23.
FranzmeierN, RubinskiA, NeitzelJ, et al.Functional connectivity associated with tau levels in ageing, Alzheimer's, and small vessel disease. Brain, 2019; 142(4):1093–1107.
24.
GeerligsL, TsvetanovKA, HensonRN. Challenges in measuring individual differences in functional connectivity using FMRI: The case of healthy aging. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017; 38(8):4125–4156.
25.
HanssonO, GrotheMJ, StrandbergTO, et al.Tau pathology distribution in Alzheimer's disease corresponds differentially to cognition-relevant functional brain networks. Front Neurosci, 2017; 11:167.
26.
HeddenT, Van DijkKRA, BeckerJA, et al.Disruption of functional connectivity in clinically normal older adults harboring amyloid burden. J Neurosci, 2009; 29(40):12686–12694; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3189-09.2009
27.
JackCR, BennettDA, BlennowK, et al.NIA-AA Research framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement, 2018; 14(4):535–562; doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
28.
JackCR, TherneauTM, WeigandSD, et al.Prevalence of biologically vs clinically defined Alzheimer spectrum entities using the National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer's Association Research Framework. JAMA Neurol, 2019; 76(10):1174–1183.
29.
JackCR, WisteHJ, WeigandSD, et al.Amyloid-first and neurodegeneration-first profiles characterize incident amyloid PET positivity. Neurology, 2013; 81(20):1732–1740; doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000435556.21319.e4
30.
JagustW. Is Amyloid-β harmful to the brain? Insights from human imaging studies. Brain J Neurol, 2016; 139(Pt 1):23–30; doi: 10.1093/brain/awv326
JelescuIO, ShepherdTM, NovikovDS, et al.Spatial relationships between white matter degeneration, amyloid load and cortical volume in amnestic mild cognitive impairment. preprint. Neuroscience, 2018; doi: 10.1101/441840
33.
JenkinsonM, BannisterP, BradyM, et al.Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images. Neuroimage, 2002; 17(2):825–841; doi: 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)91132-8
34.
JiF, PasternakO, NgKK, et al.White matter microstructural abnormalities and default network degeneration are associated with early memory deficit in Alzheimer's disease continuum. Sci Rep, 2019; 9(1):1–11.
35.
JohnsonKA, SperlingRA, GidicsinCM, et al.Florbetapir (F18-AV-45) PET to assess amyloid burden in Alzheimer's disease dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and normal aging. Alzheimers Dement, 2013; 9(5S):S72–S83; doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.10.007
36.
JonesDT, Graff-RadfordJ, LoweVJ, et al.Tau, amyloid, and cascading network failure across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Cortex, 2017; 97:143–159; doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.018
37.
JonesDT, KnopmanDS, GunterJL, et al.Cascading network failure across the Alzheimer's disease spectrum. Brain, 2016; 139(2):547–562; doi: 10.1093/brain/awv338
38.
KiselicaAM, WebberTA, BengeJF. The Uniform Dataset 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery: Factor structure, invariance testing, and demographically adjusted factor score calculation. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2020; 26(6):576–586; doi: 10.1017/S135561772000003X
LiM, WangD, RenJ, et al.Performing group-level functional image analyses based on homologous functional regions mapped in individuals. PLoS Biol, 2019; 17(3):e2007032; doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2007032
41.
LimYY, MaruffP, PietrzakRH, et al.Effect of amyloid on memory and non-memory decline from preclinical to clinical Alzheimer's disease. Brain J Neurol, 2014; 137(Pt 1):221–231; doi: 10.1093/brain/awt286
42.
LimYY, PietrzakRH, EllisKA, et al.Rapid decline in episodic memory in healthy older adults with high amyloid-β. J Alzheimers Dis, 2013; 33(3):675–679; doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121516
43.
LoweVJ, WisteHJ, SenjemML, et al.Widespread brain tau and its association with ageing, Braak Stage and Alzheimer's dementia. Brain, 2018; 141(1):271–287; doi: 10.1093/brain/awx320
44.
MaassA, BerronD, HarrisonTM, et al.Alzheimer's pathology targets distinct memory networks in the ageing brain. Brain, 2019; 142(8):2492–2509; doi: 10.1093/brain/awz154
45.
MeekerKL, AncesBM, GordonBA, et al.Default mode network dedifferentiation predicts cognitive performance in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimers Dement, 2020; 16:e044790; doi: 10.1002/alz.044790
46.
MorminoEC, SmiljicA, HayengaAO, et al.Relationships between beta-amyloid and functional connectivity in different components of the default mode network in aging. Cereb Cortex, 2011; 21(10):2399–2407; doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr025
47.
MortamaisM, AshJA, HarrisonJ, et al.Detecting cognitive changes in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: A review of its feasibility. Alzheimers Dement, 2017; 13(4):468–492; doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.2365
48.
MyersN, PasquiniL, GöttlerJ, et al.Within-patient correspondence of amyloid-β and intrinsic network connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. Brain, 2014; 137(7):2052–2064; doi: 10.1093/brain/awu103
49.
PalmqvistS, SchöllM, StrandbergO, et al.Earliest accumulation of β-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity. Nat Commun, 2017; 8(1):1214; doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01150-x
50.
PereiraJB, OssenkoppeleR, PalmqvistS, et al.Amyloid and tau accumulate across distinct spatial networks and are differentially associated with brain connectivity. Elife, 2019; 8:e50830; doi: 10.7554/eLife.50830
51.
PereiraJB, Van WestenD, StomrudE, et al.Abnormal structural brain connectome in individuals with preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Cereb Cortex, 2018; 28(10):3638–3649.
52.
PetersenRC, WisteHJ, WeigandSD, et al.Association of elevated amyloid levels with cognition and biomarkers in cognitively normal people from the community. JAMA Neurol, 2016; 73(1):85–92; doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3098
53.
RossettiHC, LacritzLH, CullumCM, et al.Normative Data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) in a population-based sample. Neurology, 2011; 77(13):1272–1275.
54.
SchultzAP, ChhatwalJP, HeddenT, et al.Phases of hyperconnectivity and hypoconnectivity in the default mode and salience networks track with amyloid and tau in clinically normal individuals. J Neurosci, 2017; 37(16):4323–4331; doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3263-16.2017
55.
SestieriC, CorbettaM, RomaniGL, et al.Episodic memory retrieval, parietal cortex, and the default mode network: Functional and topographic analyses. J Neurosci, 2011; 31(12):4407–4420.
56.
ShelineYI, RaichleME, SnyderAZ, et al.Amyloid plaques disrupt resting state default mode network connectivity in cognitively normal elderly. Biol Psychiatry, 2010; 67(6):584–587; doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.08.024
57.
SmithS, JenkinsonM, WoolrichMW, et al.Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 2004; 23Suppl 1:S208–S219; doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051
58.
Thomas YeoBT, KrienenFM, SepulcreJ, et al.The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol, 2011; 106(3):1125–1165; doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011
59.
VasilevskayaA, TaghdiriF, BurkeC, et al.Interaction of APOE4 alleles and PET tau imaging in former contact sport athletes. Neuroimage Clin, 2020; 26:102212; doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102212
60.
VemuriP, WeigandSD, PrzybelskiSA, et al.Cognitive reserve and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers are independent determinants of cognition. Brain, 2011; 134(5):1479–1492; doi: 10.1093/brain/awr049
61.
WangD, BucknerRL, FoxMD, et al.Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nat Neurosci, 2015; 18(12):1853–1860; doi: 10.1038/nn.4164
62.
WangD, LiM, WangM, et al.Individual-specific functional connectivity markers track dimensional and categorical features of psychotic illness. Mol Psychiatry, 2020; 25(9):2119–2129; doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0276-1
63.
WiepertDA, LoweVJ, KnopmanDS, et al.A Robust biomarker of large-scale network failure in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement Diagn Assess Dis Monit, 2017; 6:152–161; doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.01.004
64.
WuJW, HussainiSA, BastilleIM, et al.Neuronal activity enhances tau propagation and tau pathology in vivo. Nat Neurosci, 2016; 19(8):1085–1092; doi: 10.1038/nn.4328
65.
XueC, YuanB, YueY, et al.Distinct disruptive patterns of default mode subnetwork connectivity across the spectrum of preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci, 2019; 11:307.
66.
ZhaoY, DahmaniL, LiM, et al.Individualized functional connectome identified replicable biomarkers for dysphoric symptoms in first-episode medication-Naïve patients with major depressive disorder. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging, 2023; 8(1):42–51; doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.12.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
