Traumatic brain injury (TBI) damages white matter tracts, disrupting brain network structure and communication. There exists a wide heterogeneity in the pattern of structural damage associated with injury, as well as a large heterogeneity in behavioral outcomes. However, little is known about the relationship between changes in network connectivity and clinical outcomes.
Materials and Methods:
We utilize the rat lateral fluid-percussion injury model of severe TBI to study differences in brain connectivity in 8 animals that received the insult and 11 animals that received only a craniectomy. Diffusion tensor imaging is performed 5 weeks after the injury and network theory is used to investigate changes in white matter connectivity.
Results:
We find that (1) global network measures are not able to distinguish between healthy and injured animals; (2) injury induced alterations predominantly exist in a subset of connections (subnetworks) distributed throughout the brain; and (3) injured animals can be divided into subgroups based on changes in network motifs—measures of local structural connectivity. In addition, alterations in predicted functional connectivity indicate that the subgroups have different propensities to synchronize brain activity, which could relate to the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes.
Discussion:
These results suggest that network measures can be used to quantify progressive changes in brain connectivity due to injury and differentiate among subpopulations with similar injuries, but different pathological trajectories.
Impact statement
White matter tracts are important for efficient communication between brain regions and their connectivity pattern underlies proper brain function. Traumatic brain injury damages white matter tracts and changes brain connectivity, but how specific changes relate to differences in clinical/behavioral outcomes is not known. Using network theory to study injury-related changes in structural connectivity, we find that local measures of network structure can identify subgroups of injured rats with different types of changes in brain structure. Our results suggest that these different patterns of change could relate to differences in clinical outcomes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AchardS, SalvadorR, WhitcherB, et al.2006. A resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 26:63. LP–72.
2.
AlstottJ, BreakspearM, HagmannP, et al.2009. Modeling the impact of lesions in the human brain. PLoS Comput. Biol.
3.
AnderssonJLR, SotiropoulosSN. 2016. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage, 125:1063–1078.
4.
AnnegersJF, HauserWA, CoanSP, et al.1998. A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries. N Engl J Med, 338:20–24.
5.
ArmstrongRC, MierzwaAJ, MarionCM, et al.2016. White matter involvement after TBI: clues to axon and myelin repair capacity. Exp Neurol, 275:328–333.
6.
AvantsBB, EpsteinCL, GrossmanM, et al.2008. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Med Image Anal, 12:26–41.
7.
Avena-KoenigsbergerA, MisicB, SpornsO. 2017. Communication dynamics in complex brain networks. Nat Rev Neurosci, 19:17–33.
BensonRR, MedaSA, VasudevanS, et al.2007. Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 24:446–459.
12.
BojanekK, ZhuY, MacLeanJ. 2020. Cyclic transitions between higher order motifs underlie sustained asynchronous spiking in sparse recurrent networks. PLoS Comput Biol, 16:1–30.
13.
BolkvadzeT, PitkänenA. 2012. Development of post-traumatic epilepsy after controlled cortical impact and lateral fluid-percussion-induced brain injury in the mouse. J Neurotrauma, 29:789–812.
14.
BramlettHM, DietrichWD. 2002. Quantitative structural changes in white and gray matter 1 year following traumatic brain injury in rats. Acta Neuropathol, 103:607.
15.
BuddeMD, JanesL, GoldE, et al.2011. The contribution of gliosis to diffusion tensor anisotropy and tractography following traumatic brain injury: validation in the rat using Fourier analysis of stained tissue sections. Brain, 134:2248–2260.
16.
CaeyenberghsK, LeemansA, LeunissenI, et al.2014. Altered structural networks and executive deficits in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain Struct Funct, 29:193–209.
17.
ChristensenJ, PedersenMG, PedersenCB, et al.2009. Long-term risk of epilepsy after traumatic brain injury in children and young adults: a population-based cohort study. Lancet, 373:1105–1110.
18.
ChristmanCW, SalvantJB, WalkerSA, et al.1997. Characterization of a prolonged regenerative attempt by diffusely injured axons following traumatic brain injury in adult cat: a light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study. Acta Neuropathol, 94:329–337.
19.
Dall'AcquaP, JohannesS, MicaL, et al.2017. Functional and structural network recovery after mild traumatic brain injury: a 1-year longitudinal study. Front Hum Neurosci, 11:1–16.
20.
EnglanderJ, BushnikT, DuongTT, et al.2003. Analyzing risk factors for late posttraumatic seizures: a prospective, multicenter investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84:365–373.
21.
FagerholmED, HellyerPJ, ScottG, et al.2015. Disconnection of network hubs and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain, 138:1696–1709.
22.
FeldtS, BonifaziP, CossartR. 2011. Dissecting functional connectivity of neuronal microcircuits: experimental and theoretical insights. Trends Neurosci, 34:225–236.
23.
FornitoA, ZaleskyA, BreakspearM. 2015. The connectomics of brain disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci, 16:159–172.
24.
FreyLC. 2003. Epidemiology of posttraumatic epilepsy: a critical review. Epilepsia, 44(s10):11–17.
25.
GentlemanSM, RobertsGW, GennarelliTA, et al.1995. Axonal injury: a universal consequence of fatal closed head injury?. Acta Neuropathol, 89:537–543.
26.
GhajariM, HellyerPJ, SharpDJ. 2017. Computational modelling of traumatic brain injury predicts the location of chronic traumatic encephalopathy pathology. Brain, 140:333–343.
27.
GolloLL, BreakspearM. 2014. The frustrated brain: from dynamics on motifs to communities and networks. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci, 369:20130532.
28.
GolloLL, MirassoC, SpornsO, et al.2014. Mechanisms of zero-lag synchronization in cortical motifs. PLoS Comput Biol, 10:e1003548.
29.
GoniJ, van den HeuvelMP, Avena-KoenigsbergerA, et al.2014. Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 111:833–838.
30.
HadjiabadiD, Lovett-BarronM, RaikovIG, et al.2021. Maximally selective single-cell target for circuit control in epilepsy models. Neuron, 109:2556–2572.e6.
31.
HammRJ. 2001. Neurobehavioral assessment of outcome following traumatic brain injury in rats: an evaluation of selected measures. J Neurotrauma, 18:1207–1216.
32.
HarrisNG, MironovaYA, HovdaDA, et al.2010. Pericontusion axon sprouting is spatially and temporally consistent with a growth-permissive environment after traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 69:139–154.
33.
HarrisNG, VerleyDR, GutmanBA, et al.2016a. Bi-directional changes in fractional anisotropy after experiment TBI: disorganization and reorganization?. Neuroimage, 133:129–143.
34.
HarrisNG, VerleyDR, GutmanBA, et al.2016b. Disconnection and hyper-connectivity underlie reorganization after TBI: a rodent functional connectomic analysis. Exp Neurol, 277:124–138.
35.
HayesJP, BiglerED, VerfaellieM. 2016. Traumatic brain injury as a disorder of brain connectivity. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 22:120–137.
36.
Heuvel MP VanDen, KahnRS, GoñiJ, et al.2012. High-cost, high-capacity backbone for global brain communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 109:11372–11377.
37.
HicksR, SoaresH, SmithD, et al.1996. Temporal and spatial characterization of neuronal injury following lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in the rat. Acta Neuropathol, 91:236–246.
38.
HillaryFG, RajtmajerSM, RomanCA, et al.2014. The rich get richer: brain injury elicits hyperconnectivity in core subnetworks. PLoS One, 9:e104021.
39.
HoneyCJ, SpornsO. 2008. Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks. Hum Brain Mapp, 29:802–809.
40.
ImmonenR, KharatishviliI, GröhnO, et al.2013. MRI biomarkers for post-traumatic epileptogenesis. J Neurotrauma, 30:1305–1309.
41.
IrajiA, ChenH, WisemanN, et al.2016. Connectome-scale assessment of structural and functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury at the acute stage. Neuroimage Clin, 12:100–115.
42.
JohnsonVE, StewartJE, BegbieFD, et al.2013a. Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist for years after a single traumatic brain injury. Brain, 136(Pt 1):28–42.
KharatishviliI, NissinenJP, McIntoshTK, et al.2006. A model of posttraumatic epilepsy induced by lateral fluid-percussion brain injury in rats. Neuroscience, 140:685–697.
45.
KinnunenKM, GreenwoodR, PowellJH, et al.2011. White matter damage and cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury. Brain, 134:449–463.
46.
KönigsM, van HeurnLWE, BakxR, et al.2017. The structural connectome of children with traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 3614:3603–3614.
47.
KrausMF, SusmarasT, CaughlinBP, et al.2007. White matter integrity and cognition in chronic traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Brain, 130:2508–2519.
48.
KruskalJB. 1957. On the Shortest Spanning Subtree of a graph and the Traveling Salesman Problem. Proc Am Math Soc, 7:48–50.
49.
Mac DonaldCL, DikranianK, BaylyP, et al.2007. Diffusion tensor imaging reliably detects experimental traumatic axonal injury and indicates approximate time of injury. J Neurosci, 27:11869–11876.
50.
MahlerB, CarlssonS, AnderssonT, et al.2015. Unprovoked seizures after traumatic brain injury: a population-based case–control study. Epilepsia, 56:1438–1444.
51.
MayerAR, MannellMV, LingJ, et al.2011. Functional connectivity in mild traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 32:1825–1835.
52.
McGuireMJ, GertzSM, McCutcheonJD, et al.2019. Use of a wireless video-EEG system to monitor epileptiform discharges following lateral fluid-percussion induced traumatic brain injury. J Vis Exp, 136(Pt 1):28–42.
53.
McIntoshTK, VinkR, NobleL, et al.1989. Traumatic brain injury in the rat: characterization of a lateral fluid-percussion model. Neuroscience, 28:233–244.
54.
MoralesDM, MarklundN, LeboldD, et al.2005. Experimental models of traumatic brain injury: do we really need to build a better mousetrap?. Neuroscience, 136:971–989.
55.
MuchaPJ, RichardsonT, MaconK, et al.2010. Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks. Science, 328:876–878.
56.
OlmiS, PetkoskiS, MaximeG, et al.2019. Controlling seizure propagation in large-scale brain networks. PLoS Comput Biol, 15:1–23.
57.
OnnelaJP, SaramäkiJ, KertészJ, et al.2005. Intensity and coherence of motifs in weighted complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 71(6 Pt, 2):065103.
58.
PischiuttaF, MicottiE, HayJR, et al.2018. Single severe traumatic brain injury produces progressive pathology with ongoing contralateral white matter damage one year after injury. Exp Neurol, 300:167–178.
59.
PitkänenA, ImmonenR. 2014. Epilepsy related to traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics, 11:286–296.
60.
RauTF, KothiwalA, RovaA, et al.2014. Phenoxybenzamine is neuroprotective in a rat model of severe traumatic brain injury. Int J Mol Sci, 15:1402–17.
61.
RauTF, KothiwalAS, RovaAR, et al.2012. Treatment with low-dose methamphetamine improves behavioral and cognitive function after severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 73(2 Suppl 1):S165–S172.
62.
RubinovM, SpornsO. 2010. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52:1059–1069.
63.
SharpDJ, BeckmannCF, GreenwoodR, et al.2011. Default mode network functional and structural connectivity after traumatic brain injury. Brain, 134:2233–2247.
SidarosA, EngbergAW, SidarosK, et al.2008. Diffusion tensor imaging during recovery from severe traumatic brain injury and relation to clinical outcome: a longitudinal study. Brain, 131:559–572.
66.
SmithD, RauT, PoulsenA, et al.2018. Convulsive seizures and EEG spikes after lateral fluid-percussion injury in the rat. Epilepsy Res, 147:87–94.
67.
SmithDH, MeaneyDF, ShullWH. 2003. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 18:307–316.
SolmazB, TunçB, ParkerD, et al.2017. Assessing connectivity related injury burden in diffuse traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp, 38:2913–2922.
70.
SpornsO, KötterR. 2004. Motifs in brain networks. PLoS Biol, 2:e369.
71.
TerryJR, BenjaminO, RichardsonMP. 2012. Seizure generation: the role of nodes and networks. Epilepsia, 53:166–169.
72.
TewarieP, van DellenE, HillebrandA, et al.2015. The minimum spanning tree: an unbiased method for brain network analysis. Neuroimage, 104:177–188.
73.
ThengoneDJ, VossHU, FridmanEA, et al.2016. Local changes in network structure contribute to late communication recovery after severe brain injury. Sci Transl Med, 8:368re5.
74.
Valdés-HernándezPA. 2011. An in vivo MRI template set for morphometry, tissue segmentation, and fMRI localization in rats. Front Neuroinform, 5:1–19.
75.
van de LooijY, MauconduitF, BeaumontM, et al.2012. Diffusion tensor imaging of diffuse axonal injury in a rat brain trauma model. NMR Biomed, 25:93–103.
76.
van der HornHJ, KokJG, de KoningME, et al.2017. Altered wiring of the human structural connectome in adults with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 34:1035–1044.
77.
WangH, XinT, SunX, et al.2013. Post-traumatic seizures—a prospective, multicenter, large case study after head injury in China. Epilepsy Res, 107:272–278.
78.
WareJB, HartT, WhyteJ, et al.2017. Inter-subject variability of axonal injury in diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 34:2243–2253.
79.
WebbTS, WhiteheadCR, WellsTS, et al.2015. Neurologically-related sequelae associated with mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj, 29:430–437.
80.
WildeEA, McCauleySR, HunterJV, et al.2008. Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents. Neurology, 70:948–955.
81.
WrightDK, JohnstonLA, KershawJ, et al.2017. Changes in apparent fiber density and track-weighted imaging metrics in white matter following experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 34:2109–2118.
82.
XiaM, WangJ, HeY. 2013. BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One, 8:e68910.
ZaleskyA, FornitoA, HardingIH, et al.2010b. Whole-brain anatomical networks: does the choice of nodes matter?. Neuroimage, 50:970–983.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
