Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in combination with neuroimaging techniques allows to measure the effects of a direct perturbation of the brain. When coupled with high-density electroencephalography (TMS/hd-EEG), TMS pulses revealed electrophysiological signatures of different cortical modules in health and disease. However, the neural underpinnings of these signatures remain unclear. Here, by applying multimodal analyses of cortical response to TMS recordings and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) tractography, we investigated the relationship between functional and structural features of different cortical modules in a cohort of awake healthy volunteers. For each subject, we computed directed functional connectivity interactions between cortical areas from the source-reconstructed TMS/hd-EEG recordings and correlated them with the correspondent structural connectivity matrix extracted from dMRI tractography, in three different frequency bands (α, β, γ) and two sites of stimulation (left precuneus and left premotor). Each stimulated area appeared to mainly respond to TMS by being functionally elicited in specific frequency bands, that is, β for precuneus and γ for premotor. We also observed a temporary decrease in the whole-brain correlation between directed functional connectivity and structural connectivity after TMS in all frequency bands. Notably, when focusing on the stimulated areas only, we found that the structure–function correlation significantly increases over time in the premotor area controlateral to TMS. Our study points out the importance of taking into account the major role played by different cortical oscillations when investigating the mechanisms for integration and segregation of information in the human brain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldM, MilnerXHR, WitteH, BauerR, BraunC. 1998. Adaptive AR modeling of nonstationary time series by means of Kalman filtering. Biomed Eng IEEE Transact, 45:553–562.
2.
AstolfiL, CincottiF, MattiaD, de Vico FallaniF, TocciA, ColosimoA, et al.2008. Tracking the time-varying cortical connectivity patterns by adaptive multivariate estimators. Biomed Eng IEEE Transact, 55:902–913.
3.
BarttfeldP, UhrigL, SittJD, SigmanM, JarrayaB, DehaeneS. 2015. Signature of consciousness in the dynamics of resting-state brain activity. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A, 112:887–892.
4.
BergP, SchergM. 1994. A fast method for forward computation of multiple-shell spherical head models. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 90:58–64.
5.
BeulSF, GrantS, HilgetagCC. 2015. A predictive model of the cat cortical connectome based on cytoarchitecture and distance. Brain Struct Funct, 220:3167–3184.
6.
BonatoC, MiniussiC, RossiniPM. 2006. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: A TMS/EEG co-registration study. Clin Neurophysiol, 117:1699–1707.
7.
BortolettoM, VenieroD, ThutG, MiniussiC. 2015. The contribution of TMS—EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 49:114–124.
8.
BullmoreE, SpornsO. 2009. Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci, 10:186–198.
9.
CaeyenberghsK, LeemansA, De DeckerC, HeitgerM, DrijkoningenD, LindenCV, et al.2012. Brain connectivity and postural control in young traumatic brain injury patients: A diffusion MRI based network analysis. NeuroImage, 1:106–115.
10.
CasaliAG, CasarottoS, RosanovaM, MariottiM, MassiminiM. 2010. General indices to characterize the electrical response of the cerebral cortex to TMS. Neuroimage, 49:1459–1468.
11.
CasaliAG, GosseriesO, RosanovaM, BolyM, SarassoS, CasaliKR, et al.2013. A theoretically based index of consciousness independent of sensory processing and behavior. Sci Transl Med, 5:198ra105.
12.
CasarottoS, LauroLJR, BellinaV, CasaliAG, RosanovaM, PigoriniA, et al.2010. EEG responses to TMS are sensitive to changes in the perturbation parameters and repeatable over time. PLoS One, 5:e10281.
13.
CataniM, HowardRJ, PajevicS, JonesDK. 2002. Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain. Neuroimage, 17:77–94.
14.
ChuCJ, TanakaN, DiazJ, EdlowBL, WuO, HämäläinenM, et al.2015. EEG functional connectivity is partially predicted by underlying white matter connectivity. Neuroimage, 108:23–33.
15.
ConaF, ZavagliaM, MassiminiM, RosanovaM, UrsinoM. 2011. A neural mass model of interconnected regions simulates rhythm propagation observed via TMS-EEG. Neuroimage, 57:1045–1058.
16.
De GeeterN, CrevecoeurG, LeemansA, DupreL. 2015. Effective electric fields along realistic DTI-based neural trajectories for modelling the stimulation mechanisms of TMS. Phys Med Biol, 60:453–471.
17.
EfronB, TibshiraniR. 1986. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci, 1:54–75.
18.
FerrarelliF, SarassoS, GullerY, RiednerBA, PetersonMJ, BellesiM, et al.2012. Reduced natural oscillatory frequency of frontal thalamocortical circuits in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 69:766–774.
19.
GosseriesO, SarassoS, CasarottoS, BolyM, SchnakersC, NapolitaniM, et al.2015. On the cerebral origin of EEG responses to TMS: Insights from severe cortical lesions. Brain Stimul, 8:142–149.
20.
GrangerCW. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37:424–438.
21.
GroppaS, MuthuramanM, OttoB, DeuschlG, SiebnerHR, RaethjenJ. 2013. Subcortical substrates of TMS induced modulation of the cortico-cortical connectivity. Brain Stimul, 6:138–146.
22.
HagmannP, CammounL, GigandetX, MeuliR, HoneyCJ, WedeenVJ, SpornsO. 2008. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol, 6:e159.
23.
IlmoniemiRJ, VirtanenJ, RuohonenJ, KarhuJ, AronenHJ, KatilaT, et al.1997. Neuronal responses to magnetic stimulation reveal cortical reactivity and connectivity. Neuroreport, 8:3537–3540.
24.
JeurissenB, LeemansA, JonesDK, TournierJ-D, SijbersJ. 2011. Probabilistic fiber tracking using the residual bootstrap with constrained spherical deconvolution. Hum Brain Mapp, 32:461–479.
25.
JonesDK, HorsfieldMA, SimmonsA. 1999. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 42:515–525.
26.
KaminskiMJ, BlinowskaKJ. 1991. A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures. Biol Cybernet, 65:203–210.
27.
LeemansA, JonesDK. 2009. The B-matrix must be rotated when correcting for subject motion in DTI data. Magn Reson Med, 61:1336–1349.
LiuQ, BalstersJH, BaechingerM, van der GroenO, WenderothN, MantiniD. 2015. Estimating a neutral reference for electroencephalographic recordings: The importance of using a high-density montage and a realistic head model. J Neural Eng, 12:056012.
30.
MassiminiM, FerrarelliF, HuberR, EsserSK, SinghH, TononiG. 2005. Breakdown of cortical effective connectivity during sleep. Science, 309:2228–2232.
31.
MattoutJ, PhillipsC, PennyWD, RuggMD, FristonKJ. 2006. MEG source localization under multiple constraints: An extended Bayesian framework. Neuroimage, 30:753–767.
32.
PhillipsC, MattoutJ, RuggMD, MaquetP, FristonKJ. 2005. An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG. Neuroimage, 24:997–1011.
RoineU, SalmiJ, RoineT, Nieminen-von WendtT, LeppämäkiS, RintahakaP, et al.2015. Constrained spherical deconvolution-based tractography and tract-based spatial statistics show abnormal microstructural organization in Asperger syndrome. Mol Autism, 6:1–12.
36.
RosanovaM, CasaliA, BellinaV, RestaF, MariottiM, MassiminiM. 2009. Natural frequencies of human corticothalamic circuits. J Neurosci, 29:7679–7685.
37.
RosanovaM, GosseriesO, CasarottoS, BolyM, CasaliAG, BrunoMA, et al.2012. Recovery of cortical effective connectivity and recovery of consciousness in vegetative patients. Brain 135 (Pt 4):1308–1320.
38.
RubinovM, SpornsO. 2010. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52:1059–1069.
39.
ScholtensLH, SchmidtR, de ReusMA, van den HeuvelMP. 2014. Linking macroscale graph analytical organization to microscale neuroarchitectonics in the macaque connectome. J Neurosci, 34:12192–12205.
40.
SmithRE, TournierJ-D, CalamanteF, ConnellyA. 2012. Anatomically-constrained tractography: Improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography through effective use of anatomical information. Neuroimage, 62:1924–1938.
41.
SmithSM, JenkinsonM, WoolrichMW, BeckmannCF, BehrensTEJ, Johansen-BergH, et al.2004. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage, 23:S208–S219.
42.
SongS-K, SunS-W, RamsbottomMJ, ChangC, RussellJ, CrossAH. 2002. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage, 17:1429–1436.
43.
SpornsO. 2011. Networks of the Brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.
44.
SpornsO, TononiG, KötterR. 2005. The human connectome: A structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol, 1:e42.
45.
TournierJ, CalamanteF, ConnellyA. 2012. MRtrix: Diffusion tractography in crossing fiber regions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol, 22:53–66.
46.
TournierJ, CalamanteF, ConnellyA. 2013. Determination of the appropriate b value and number of gradient directions for high-angular-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging. NMR Biomed, 26:1775–1786.
47.
TournierJ, CalamanteF, GadianDG, ConnellyA. 2004. Direct estimation of the fiber orientation density function from diffusion-weighted MRI data using spherical deconvolution. Neuroimage, 23:1176–1185.
48.
TournierJ, YehC-H, CalamanteF, ChoK-H, ConnellyA, LinC-P, et al.2008. Resolving crossing fibres using constrained spherical deconvolution: Validation using diffusion-weighted imaging phantom data. Neuroimage, 42:617–625.
49.
Tzourio-MazoyerN, LandeauB, PapathanassiouD, CrivelloF, EtardO, DelcroixN, et al.2002. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15:273–289.
50.
van den HeuvelMP, ScholtensLH, BarrettLF, HilgetagCC, de ReusMA. 2015. Bridging cytoarchitectonics and connectomics in human cerebral cortex. J Neurosci, 35:13943–13948.
51.
Van Der WerfYD, PausT. 2006. The neural response to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex. I. Intracortical and cortico-cortical contributions. Exp Brain Res, 175:231–245.
52.
Van MierloP, CarretteE, HallezH, RaedtR, MeursA, VandenbergheS, et al.2013. Ictal-onset localization through connectivity analysis of intracranial EEG signals in patients with refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia, 54:1409–1418.
53.
Van MierloP, CarretteE, HallezH, VonckK, Van RoostD, BoonP, StaelensS. 2011. Accurate epileptogenic focus localization through time-variant functional connectivity analysis of intracranial electroencephalographic signals. Neuroimage, 56:1122–1133.
54.
VoineskosAN, FarzanF, BarrMS, LobaughNJ, MulsantBH, ChenR, et al.2010. The role of the corpus callosum in transcranial magnetic stimulation induced interhemispheric signal propagation. Biol Psychiatry, 68:825–831.
55.
WagnerT, RushmoreJ, EdenU, Valero-CabreA. 2009. Biophysical foundations underlying TMS: Setting the stage for an effective use of neurostimulation in the cognitive neurosciences. Cortex, 45:1025–1034.
56.
WilkeC, DingL, HeB. 2008. Estimation of time-varying connectivity patterns through the use of an adaptive directed transfer function. Biomed Eng IEEE Transact, 55:2557–2564.
57.
XiaM, WangJ, HeY. 2013. BrainNet Viewer: A network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One, 8:e68910.
58.
YaoD. 2001. A method to standardize a reference of scalp EEG recordings to a point at infinity. Physiol Meas, 22:693–711.
59.
ZaleskyA, AkhlaghiH, CorbenLA, BradshawJL, DelatyckiMB, StoreyE, et al.2014. Cerebello-cerebral connectivity deficits in Friedreich ataxia. Brain Struct Funct, 219:969–981.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
