Overt picture naming causes activation in both left and right hemispheres as demonstrated by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. Unexpectedly, a previous experiment revealed that there was no difference in brain lateralization related to handedness. To understand the mechanisms behind this phenomenon and to investigate the influence that each hemisphere exerts over the other in more detail, we analyzed the effective connectivity in the naming network. More specifically, we examined the impact of handedness on hemispheric interactions. Four brain regions activated for correct naming in the previous fMRI experiment served as volumes of interest: Bilateral fusiform gyrus (FG) related to visual-semantic processing and bilateral Brodmann's area (BA) 44 related to phonological processing. We defined three dynamic causal models (DCMs) representing different symmetrical connectivity patterns, compared them using Bayesian model selection, and considered differential connection strengths. For the majority of 31 participants, the same model featuring early integration of visual-semantic processing and independent phonological processing was optimal. This also held true if right-handers, left-handers, and ambidexters were considered as independent groups. For left-handers, the connection of right FG and right BA 44 was significantly stronger compared with the other two groups, and it was significantly stronger than its left-hemisphere equivalent. In right-handers, the according left-hemisphere connection was significant, but connectivities were rather symmetrical. These findings reveal significant and unique right-hemisphere contributions to word production.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelS, DresselK, KümmererD, SaurD, MaderI, WeillerCet al.2009. Correct and erroneous picture naming responses in healthy subjects. Neurosci Lett, 463:167–171.
2.
AllenP, MechelliA, StephanKE, DayF, DaltonJ, WilliamsSet al.2008. Fronto-temporal interactions during overt verbal initiation and suppression. J Cogn Neurosci, 20:1656–1669.
3.
AmuntsK, SchleicherA, BurgelU, MohlbergH, UylingsHBM, ZillesK. 1999. Broca's region revisited: cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability. J Comp Neurol, 412:319–341.
4.
AmuntsK, WeissPH, MohlbergH, PieperhoffP, EickhoffS, GurdJMet al.2004. Analysis of neural mechanisms underlying verbal fluency in cytoarchitectonically defined stereotaxic space—the roles of Brodmann areas 44 and 45. Neuroimage, 22:42–56.
5.
BitanT, BoothJR, ChoyJ, BurmanDD, GitelmanDR, MesulamMM. 2005. Shifts of effective connectivity within a language network during rhyming and spelling. J Neurosci, 25:5397–5403.
6.
ChowHM, KaupB, RaabeM, GreenleeMW. 2008. Evidence of fronto-temporal interactions for strategic inference processes during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 40:940–954.
7.
CrossonB, MooreAB, McGregorK, ChangYL, BenjaminM, GopinathKet al.2009. Regional changes in word-production laterality after a naming treatment designed to produce a rightward shift in frontal activity. Brain Lang, 111:73–85.
8.
EickhoffSB, GrefkesC, FinkGR, ZillesK. 2008. Functional lateralization of face, hand, and trunk representation in anatomically defined human somatosensory areas. Cereb Cortex, 18:2820–2830.
9.
EickhoffSB, HeimS, ZillesK, AmuntsK. 2006. Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. Neuroimage, 32:570–582.
10.
EickhoffSB, HeimS, ZillesK, AmuntsK. 2009. A systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci, 367:2399–2421.
11.
EickhoffSB, StephanKE, MohlbergH, GrefkesC, FinkGR, AmuntsKet al.2005. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage, 25:1325–1335.
FuCH, McIntoshAR, KimJ, ChauW, BullmoreET, WilliamsSCet al.2006. Modulation of effective connectivity by cognitive demand in phonological verbal fluency. Neuroimage, 30:266–271.
14.
GazzanigaMS, IvryRB, MangunGR. 2008. Cognitive Neuroscience. The Biology of the Mind. New York: W.W. Norton.
15.
GhioM, TettamantiM. 2010. Semantic domain-specific functional integration for action-related vs. abstract concepts. Brain Lang, 112:223–232.
16.
GrefkesC, EickhoffSB, NowakDA, DafotakisM, FinkGR. 2008a. Dynamic intra- and interhemispheric interactions during unilateral and bilateral hand movements assessed with fMRI and DCM. Neuroimage, 41:1382–1394.
17.
GrefkesC, NowakDA, EickhoffSB, DafotakisM, KustJ, KarbeHet al.2008b. Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol, 63:236–246.
18.
GrefkesC, NowakDA, WangLE, DafotakisM, EickhoffSB, FinkGR. 2010. Modulating cortical connectivity in stroke patients by rTMS assessed with fMRI and dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage, 50:233–242.
19.
HattaT. 2007. Handedness and the brain: a review of brain-imaging techniques. Magn Reson Med Sci, 6:99–112.
20.
HeimS, EickhoffSB, AmuntsK. 2008. Specialisation in Broca's region for semantic, phonological, and syntactic fluency?Neuroimage, 40:1362–1368.
21.
HeimS, EickhoffSB, AmuntsK. 2009a. Different roles of cytoarchitectonic BA 44 and BA 45 in phonological and semantic verbal fluency as revealed by dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage, 48:616–624.
22.
HeimS, EickhoffSB, IschebeckAK, FriedericiAD, StephanKE, AmuntsK. 2009b. Effective connectivity of the left BA 44, BA 45, and inferior temporal gyrus during lexical and phonological decisions identified with DCM. Hum Brain Mapp, 30:392–402.
23.
IndefreyP, LeveltWJM. 2004. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92:101–144.
24.
KnechtS, DeppeM, DragerB, BobeL, LohmannH, RingelsteinEet al.2000a. Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain, 123,Pt 1:74–81.
25.
KnechtS, DragerB, DeppeM, BobeL, LohmannH, FloelAet al.2000b. Handedness and hemispheric language dominance in healthy humans. Brain, 123,Pt 12:2512–2518.
26.
KoutstaalW, WagnerAD, RotteM, MarilA, BucknerRL, SchacterDL. 2001. Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex. Neuropsychologia, 39:184–199.
27.
LeffAP, SchofieldTM, StephanKE, CrinionJT, FristonKJ, PriceCJ. 2008. The cortical dynamics of intelligible speech. J Neurosci, 28:13209–13215.
28.
LindellAK. 2006. In your right mind: right hemisphere contributions to language processing and production. Neuropsychol Rev, 16:131–148.
29.
MarsolekCJ. 1999. Dissociable neural subsystems underlie abstract and specific object recognition. Psychol Sci, 10:111–118.
30.
MechelliA, CrinionJT, LongS, FristonKJ, Lambon-RalphMA, PattersonKet al.2005. Dissociating reading processes on the basis of neural interactions. J Cogn Neurosci, 17:1753–1765.
31.
MoscovitchM. 1977. The development of lateralization of language functions and its relation to cognitive and linguistic development: a review and some theoretical speculations. SegalowitzSJ, GruberFA. Language Development and Neurological Theory. New York: Academic Press, 194–212.
32.
MurthaS, ChertkowH, BeauregardM, EvansA. 1999. The neural substrate of picture naming. J Cogn Neurosci, 11:399–423.
33.
NoppeneyU, JosephsO, HockingJ, PriceCJ, FristonKJ. 2008. The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cereb Cortex, 18:598–609.
34.
OldfieldRC. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness. The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9:97–113.
PoldrackRA, WagnerAD, PrullMW, DesmondJE, GloverGH, GabrieliJD. 1999. Functional specialization for semantic and phonological processing in the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Neuroimage, 10:15–35.
37.
PowellHWR, ParkerGJM, AlexanderDC, SymmsMR, BoulbyPA, Wheeler-KingshottCAMet al.2006. Hemispheric asymmetries in language-related pathways: a combined functional MRI and tractography study. Neuroimage, 32:388–399.
38.
PughKR, ShaywitzBA, ShaywitzSE, ConstableRT, SkudlarskiP, FulbrightRKet al.1996. Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119,Pt 4:1221–1238.
39.
PughKR, ShaywitzBA, ShaywitzSE, ShankweilerDP, KatzL, FletcherJMet al.1997. Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: the cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 23:299–318.
40.
SaurD, LangeR, BaumgaertnerA, SchraknepperV, WillmesK, RijntjesMet al.2006. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain, 129:1371–1384.
41.
SchuylerB, OllingerJM, OakesTR, JohnstoneT, DavidsonRJ. 2010. Dynamic causal modeling applied to fMRI data shows high reliability. Neuroimage, 49:603–611.
42.
SeghierML, PriceCJ. 2010. Reading aloud boosts connectivity through the putamen. Cereb Cortex, 20:570–582.
43.
Siman-TovT, MendelsohnA, SchonbergT, AvidanG, PodlipskyI, PessoaLet al.2007. Bihemispheric leftward bias in a visuospatial attention-related network. J Neurosci, 27:11271–11278.
44.
SnodgrassJG, VanderwartM. 1980. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol [Hum Learn], 6:174–215.
45.
SontySP, MesulamMM, WeintraubS, JohnsonNA, ParrishTB, GitelmanDR. 2007. Altered effective connectivity within the language network in primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci, 27:1334–1345.
46.
SpringerSP, DeutschG. 2001. Left Brain, Right Brain. Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: Freeman.
47.
StephanKE, FinkGR, MarshallJC. 2007a. Mechanisms of hemispheric specialization: insights from analyses of connectivity. Neuropsychologia, 45:209–228.
48.
StephanKE, MarshallJC, FristonKJ, RoweJB, RitzlA, ZillesKet al.2003. Lateralized cognitive processes and lateralized task control in the human brain. Science, 301:384–386.
49.
StephanKE, MarshallJC, PennyWD, FristonKJ, FinkGR. 2007b. Interhemispheric integration of visual processing during task-driven lateralization. J Neurosci, 27:3512–3522.
50.
StephanKE, PennyWD, DaunizeauJ, MoranRJ, FristonKJ. 2009. Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage, 46:1004–1017.
51.
StephanKE, PennyWD, MoranRJ, den OudenHEM, DaunizeauJ, FristonKJ. 2010. Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling. Neuroimage, 49:3099–3109.
52.
ThompsonCK. 2005. Functional neuroimaging: applications for studying aphasia. La PointeLL. Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Language Disorders, 3rd. New York: Thieme, 19–38.
53.
VigneauM, BeaucousinV, HervéPY, DuffauH, CrivelloF, HoudéOet al.2006. Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing. Neuroimage, 30:1414–1432.
54.
WhatmoughC, ChertkowH. 2003. Neuroanatomical aspects of naming. HillisAE. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. Integrating Cognitive Neuropsychology, Neurology, and Rehabilitation. New York: Psychology Press, 143–161.
55.
ZahnR, SchwarzM, HuberW. 2006. Functional activation studies of word processing in the recovery from aphasia. J Physiol, 99:370–385.
56.
ZaitsevM, HennigJ, SpeckO. 2004. Point spread function mapping with parallel imaging techniques and high acceleration factors: fast, robust and flexible method for echo planar imaging distortion correction. MRM, 52:1156–1166.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
