Landed missions to icy worlds with a subsurface liquid water ocean must meet planetary protection requirements and ensure a sufficiently small likelihood of any microorganism-bearing part of the landed element reaching the ocean. A higher bound on this likelihood is set by the potential for radioisotope thermoelectric generator (RTG) power sources, the hottest possible landed element, to melt through the ice shell and reach the ocean. In this study, we quantify this potential as a function of three key parameters: surface temperature, ice shell thickness (i.e., heat flux through the shell), and thickness of a porous (insulating) snow or regolith cover. Although the model we describe can be applied to any ocean world, we present results in the context of a landed mission concept to the south polar terrain of Saturn's moon Enceladus. In this particular context, we discuss planetary protection considerations for landing site selection. The likelihood of forward microbial contamination of Enceladus' ocean by an RTG-powered landed mission can be made sufficiently low to not undermine compliance with the planetary protection policy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramovO and SpencerJR (2009) Endogenic heat from Enceladus' south polar fractures: new observations, and models of conductive surface heating. Icarus, 199:189–196.
2.
AlbertMR and PerronFE (2000) Ice layer and surface crust permeability in a seasonal snow pack. Hydrol Process, 14:3207–3214.
3.
AndreasEL (2007) New estimates for the sublimation rate for ice on the Moon. Icarus, 186:24–30.
4.
ArakawaS, TanakaH, KataokaA, et al. (2017) Thermal conductivity of porous aggregates. Astron Astrophys, 608:L7.
5.
ArthernRJ, VaughanDG, RankinAM, et al. (2010) In situ measurements of Antarctic snow compaction compared with predictions of models. J Geophys Res Earth Surf, 115:F3011.
6.
BalandRM, YseboodtM, and Van HoolstT (2016) The obliquity of Enceladus. Icarus, 268:12–31.
7.
BennettG, LombardoJ, HemlerR, et al. (2006) Mission of daring: the general-purpose heat source radioisotope thermoelectric generator. In 4th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit (IECEC), 4096, San Diego,CA.
8.
BurattiBJ, DalbaPA, HicksMD, et al. (2014) Enceladus: surface texture and roughness as clues to what lies beneath [abstract 2038]. In Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. Available online at https://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2014/pdf/2038.pdf (last accessed August6, 2022).
9.
CalonneN, FlinF, MorinS, et al. (2011) Numerical and experimental investigations of the effective thermal conductivity of snow. Geophys Res Lett, 38:L23501.
10.
CarvanoJM, MiglioriniA, BarucciA, et al. (2007) Constraining the surface properties of Saturn's icy moons, using Cassini/CIRS emissivity spectra. Icarus, 187:574–583.
11.
ChenM, AtchisonJ, CarrelliD, et al. (2018) Small-body maneuvering autonomous real-time navigation (SMART Nav): guiding a spacecraft to Didymos for NASA's Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART). Proc Adv Astronaut Sci AAS/AIAA Guidance Navigat Control, 164:18-063.
12.
ChoukrounM, MolaroJL, HodyssR, et al. (2020) Strength evolution of ice plume deposit analogs of Enceladus and Europa. Geophys Res Lett, 47:e2020GL088953.
13.
ChristianJA (2015) Optical navigation using planet's centroid and apparent diameter in image. J Guid Control Dyn, 38:192–204.
14.
ChristianJA (2021) A tutorial on horizon-based optical navigation and attitude determination with space imaging systems. IEEE Access, 9:19819–19853.
15.
CombeJP, McCordTB, MatsonDL, et al. (2019) Nature, distribution and origin of CO2 on Enceladus. Icarus, 317:491–508.
16.
Committee on Space Research (COSPAR) (2021) Policy on Planetary Protection. Available online at http://cosparhq.cnes.fr/assets/uploads/2021/07/PPPolicy_2021_3-June.pdf (accessed December10, 2021).
17.
Department of Energy (1973) SNAP Pioneer F & G—Final Report. DOE/ET/13512—T1, Publicly Released in 2006. Available online at https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/5352675 (accessed June30, 2021).
18.
DeschSJ, CookJC, DoggettTC, et al. (2009) Thermal evolution of Kuiper belt objects, with implications for cryovolcanism. Icarus, 202:694–714.
19.
EigenbrodeJL, GoldR, CanhamJS, et al. (2021) Contamination control for ultra-sensitive life-detection missions. Front Space Technol, 6:734423.
20.
GetzandannerKM, AntreasianPG, MoreauMC, et al. (2022) Small body proximity operations & TAG: navigation experiences & lessons learned from the OSIRIS-REx mission [abstract 2387]. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum. San Diego,CA.
21.
GoldenKM, EickenH, HeatonAL, et al. (2007) Thermal evolution of permeability and microstructure in sea ice. Geophys Res Lett, 34:L16501.
22.
GrassetO, BunceEJ, CoustenisA, et al. (2013) Review of exchange processes on Ganymede in view of its planetary protection categorization. Astrobiology, 13:991–1004.
23.
HandKP, MurrayAE, GarvinJB, et al. (2017) Report of the Europa Lander Science Definition Team. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Available online at https://europa.nasa.gov/system/downloadable_items/50_Europa_Lander_SDT_Report_2016.pdf (last accessed August6, 2022).
24.
HedmanMM, NicholsonPD, ShowalterMR, et al. (2009) Spectral observations of the Enceladus plume with Cassini-VIMS. Astrophys J, 693:1749.
25.
HemingwayDJ and MittalT (2019) Enceladus's ice shell structure as a window on internal heat production. Icarus, 332:111–131.
26.
HollenbergCL, ChristianJA, BhaskaranS, et al. (2019) Centroiding performance for horizon-based optical navigation with Cassini images of Dione and Rhea [abstract 19-494]. In 29th AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting. Available online at https://www.space-flight.org/docs/2019_winter/29thSFM_Program_06-01-19_AS_96.pdf (last accessed August6, 2022).
27.
HowellSM and PappalardoRT (2019) Can Earth-like plate tectonics occur in ocean world ice shells? Icarus 322:69–79.
28.
HowettCJA, SpencerJR, PearlJ, et al. (2010) Thermal inertia and bolometric Bond albedo values for Mimas, Enceladus, Tethys, Dione, Rhea and Iapetus as derived from Cassini/CIRS measurements. Icarus, 206:573–593.
29.
HowettCJA, SpencerJR, PearlJ, et al. (2011) High heat flow from Enceladus' south polar region measured using 10–600 cm−1 Cassini/CIRS data. J Geophys Res Planets, 116:E3003.
30.
IessL, StevensonDJ, ParisiM, et al. (2014) The gravity field and interior structure of Enceladus. Science, 344:78–80.
31.
JohnsonAE, AaronSB, AnsariH, et al. (2022) Mars 2020 Lander Vision System flight performance [abstract 1214]. In AIAA SciTech 2022 Forum. San Diego,CA.
32.
KawaguchiY, ShibuyaM, KinoshitaI, et al. (2020) DNA damage and survival time course of deinococcal cell pellets during 3 years of exposure to outer space. Front Microbiol, 11:2050.
33.
KlingerJ (1980) Influence of a phase transition of ice on the heat and mass balance of comets. Science, 209:271.
34.
KrauseM, BlumJ, SkorovYV, et al. (2011) Thermal conductivity measurements of porous dust aggregates: I. Technique, model and first results. Icarus, 214:286–296.
35.
Le GallA, LeyratC, JanssenMA, et al. (2017) Thermally anomalous features in the subsurface of Enceladus's south polar terrain. Nat Astron, 1:0063.
36.
LorenzRD (2012) Thermal drilling in planetary ices: an analytic solution with application to planetary protection problems of radioisotope power sources. Astrobiology, 12:799–802.
37.
LorenzRD (2019) Calculating risk and payoff in planetary exploration and life detection missions. Adv Space Res, 64:944–956.
38.
LorenzRD and ClarkeES (2020) Influence of the Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) on the local atmospheric environment. Planet Space Sci, 193:105075.
39.
MacKenzieSM, KirbyKW, GreenauerPJ, et al. (2020) Enceladus Orbilander. Planetary Mission Concept Study Report for the 2023–2032 Decadal Survey. Available online at https://science.nasa.gov/science-pink/s3fs-public/atoms/files/Enceladus%20Orbilander.pdf (last accessed August6, 2022).
40.
MacKenzieSM, NeveuM, DavilaAF, et al. (2021) The Enceladus Orbilander Mission Concept: balancing return and resources in the search for life. Planet Sci J, 2:77.
41.
MartensHR, IngersollAP, EwaldSP, et al. (2015) Spatial distribution of ice blocks on Enceladus and implications for their origin and emplacement. Icarus, 245:162–176.
42.
McGeeTG, AdamsD, HibbardK, et al. (2018) Guidance, navigation, and control for exploration of Titan with the Dragonfly rotorcraft lander [abstract 1330]. AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Kissimmee,FL.
43.
MelinderÅ (2007) Thermophysical properties of aqueous solutions used as secondary working fluids. Doctoral dissertation, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden.
44.
MolaroJL, ChoukrounM, PhillipsCB, et al. (2019) The microstructural evolution of water ice in the solar system through sintering. J Geophys Res Planets, 124:243–277.
45.
MousisO, ChassefiereE, HolmNG, et al. (2015) Methane clathrates in the solar system. Astrobiology, 15:308–326.
46.
MurphyDM and KoopT (2005) Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications. Quart J Royal Meteorol Soc, 131:1539–1565.
47.
NASA (2020) Radioisotope Power Systems—Safety and Reliability. Available online at https://rps.nasa.gov/about-rps/safety-and-reliability (accessed December18, 2020).
48.
NettoAST (1993) Pore-size distribution in sandstones. AAPG Bull, 77:1101–1104.
49.
OlesonS, NewmanJM, DombardA, et al. (2019) Compass Final Report: Europa Tunnelbot. NASA/TP—2019-220054. Available online at https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20190026714.pdf (last accessed August6, 2022).
50.
PajolaM, LucchettiA, SenterL, et al. (2021) Blocks size frequency distribution in the Enceladus Tiger Stripes Area: implications on their formative processes. Universe, 7:82.
51.
PavlakTA, JohannesenJR, and BordiJJ (2017) Juno trajectory redesign following PRM cancellation [abstract 573]. In AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Pasadena, CA.
52.
PorcoCC, DonesL, and MitchellC (2017) Could it be snowing microbes on Enceladus? Assessing conditions in its plume and implications for future missions. Astrobiology, 17:876–901.
53.
PostbergF, ClarkRN, HansenCJ, et al. (2018) Plume and surface composition of Enceladus. In Enceladus and the Icy Moons of Saturn, edited by P. Schenk, R.N. Clark, C.J.A. Howett, et al., University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, pp. 129–162.
54.
ProkschM, RutterN, FierzC, et al. (2016) Intercomparison of snow density measurements: bias, precision, and vertical resolution. Cryosphere, 10:371–384.
55.
RosenheadL (1963) Laminar Boundary Layers; an Account of the Development, Structure, and Stability of Laminar Boundary Layers in Incompressible Fluids, Together with a Description of the Associated Experimental Techniques. Clarendon Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
56.
ShoshanyY, PrialnikD, and PodolakM (2002) Monte Carlo modeling of the thermal conductivity of porous cometary ice. Icarus, 157:219–227.
57.
SouthworthBS, KempfS, and SpitaleJ (2019) Surface deposition of the Enceladus plume and the zenith angle of emissions. Icarus, 319:33–42.
58.
StrangeN, GoodsonT, and HahnY (2002) Cassini tour redesign for the Huygens mission [abstract 4720]. In AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit. Monterey, CA.
59.
ThomasPC, TajeddineR, TiscarenoMS, et al. (2016) Enceladus's measured physical libration requires a global subsurface ocean. Icarus, 264:37–47.
60.
TrumboSK, BrownME, and ButlerBJ (2018) ALMA thermal observations of Europa. Astron J, 156:161.
61.
UlamecS, BieleJ, FunkeO, et al. (2007) Access to glacial and subglacial environments in the Solar System by melting probe technology. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 6:71–94.
62.
VerbiscerAJ, FrenchRG, and McGheeCA (2005) The opposition surge of Enceladus: HST observations 338–1022 nm. Icarus, 173:66–83.
63.
WaiteJH, LewisWS, MageeBA, et al. (2009) Liquid water on Enceladus from observations of ammonia and 40 Ar in the plume. Nature, 460:487–490.
64.
WaiteJH, GleinCR, PerrymanRS, et al. (2017) Cassini finds molecular hydrogen in the Enceladus plume: evidence for hydrothermal processes. Science, 356:155–159.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
