In the present work, near-infrared, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy, Raman, and X-ray diffractometer techniques have been complementarily used to carry out a comprehensive characterization of a terrestrial analogue selected from the Chesapeake Bay impact structure (CBIS). The obtained data clearly highlight the key role of Raman spectroscopy in the detection of minor and trace compounds, through which inferences about geological processes occurred in the CBIS can be extrapolated. Beside the use of commercial systems, further Raman analyses were performed by the Raman laser spectrometer (RLS) ExoMars Simulator. This instrument represents the most reliable tool to effectively predict the scientific capabilities of the ExoMars/Raman system that will be deployed on Mars in 2021. By emulating the analytical procedures and operational restrictions established by the ExoMars mission rover design, it was proved that the RLS ExoMars Simulator can detect the amorphization of quartz, which constitutes an analytical clue of the impact origin of craters. Beside amorphized minerals, the detection of barite and siderite, compounds crystallizing under hydrothermal conditions, helps indirectly to confirm the presence of water in impact targets. Furthermore, the RLS ExoMars Simulator capability of performing smart molecular mappings was successfully evaluated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarlowN. and PerezC.B. (2003) Martian impact crater ejecta morphologies as indicators of the distribution of subsurface volatiles. J Geophys Res Planets, 108:N08.
2.
BartosovaK., GierS., HortonJ.W.Jr., KoeberlC., MaderD., and DypvikH. (2010) Petrography, mineralogy, and geochemistry of deep gravelly sands in the Eyreville B core, Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Meteorit Planet Sci, 45:1021–1052.
3.
BostN., RambozC., LeBretonN., FoucherF., Lopez-ReyesG., De AngelisS., JossetM., VenegasG., Sanz-ArranzA., RullF., MedinaJ., JossetJ.L., SouchonA., AmmannitoE., De SanctisM.C., Di IorioT., CarliC., VagoJ.L., and WestallF. (2015) Testing the ability of the ExoMars 2018 payload to document geological context and potential habitability on Mars. Planet Space Sci, 108:87–97.
4.
BurtD.M., KirklandL.E., and AdamsP.M. (2004) Barite and celestine detection in the thermal infrared- possible application to determination of aqueous environments on Mars. In Proceeding from the Lunar and Planetary Science XXXV Conference, Houston, TX.
5.
CollinsG.S. and WünnemannK. (2005) How big was the Chesapeake Bay impact? Insight from numerical modeling. Geol Soc Am, 33:925–928.
6.
DebusA., BacherM., BallA., BarcosO., BethgeB., GaubertF., HaldemannA., KminekG., LindnerR., PacrosA., RohrT., TrautnerR., and VagoJ. (2010) Exomars 2010 Rover Pasteur payload sample analysis. In Proceeding from the 38th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Bremen, Germany.
7.
de FariaD.L.A. and LopesF.N. (2007) Heated goethite and natural hematite: can Raman spectroscopy be used to differentiate them?. Vib Spectrosc, 45:117–121.
8.
de VilliersG., KingD.T., and MarzenL.J. (2010) A study of candidate marine target impact craters in Arabia Terra, Mars. Meteorit Planet Sci, 45:947–964.
9.
DypvikH. and JansaL.F. (2003) Sedimentary signatures and processes during marine bolide impacts: a review. Sediment Geol, 161:309–337.
10.
EdwardsH.G.M., VandenabeeleP., Jorge-VIllarS.E., CarterE.A., Rull PerezF., and HargreavesM.D. (2007) The Rio Tinto Mars analogue site: an extremophilic Raman spectroscopic study. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc, 68:1133–1137.
11.
FordM.H., AuerbachS.M., and MonsonP.A. (2004) On the mechanical properties and phase behavior of silica: a simple model based on low coordination and strong association. J Chem Phys, 121:8415–8422.
12.
FreemanJ.J., WangA., KueblerK., JoliffB.L., and HaskinL.A. (2008) Characterization of natural feldspars by Raman spectroscopy for future planetary exploration. Can Mineral, 46:1477–1500.
13.
FritzJ., WünnemannK., ReimoldW.U., MeyerC., and HornemannU. (2011) Shock experiments on quartz targets pre-cooled to 77 K. Int J Impact Eng, 38:440–445.
14.
GohnG.S., KoeberlC., MillerK.G., ReimoldW.U., BrowningJ.V., CockellC.S., HortonJ.W.Jr., KenkmannT., KulpeczA.A., PowardsD.S., SanfordW.E., and VoytekM.A. (2008) Deep drilling into the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Science, 320:1740–1745.
15.
HanorJ.S. (2000) Barite-celestine geochemistry and environments of formation. Rev Mineral Geochem, 40:193–275.
16.
HerrickR.R. and HynekB.M. (2017) Investigating target versus impactor influences on Martian crater morphology at simple-complex transition. Meterot Planet Sci, 52:1722–1743.
17.
HortonJ.W.Jr. and IzettG.A. (2005) Crystalline-rock ejecta and shocked minerals of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, USGS-NASA Langley Core, Hampton, Virginia, with supplemental constraints on the age of the impact. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper, 1688:34 pp [Chapter E of Horton et al. (2005)].
18.
HortonJ.W.Jr., PowarsD.S., and GohnG.S., editors. (2005) Studies of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure—the USGS-NASA Langley Corehole, Hampton, Virginia, and related coreholes and geophysical surveys. U.S. Geological Survey. Reston,VA.
19.
HortonJ.W.Jr., OrmoJ., PowarsD.S., and GohnG.S. (2006) Chesapeake Bay impact structure: morphology, crater fill, and relevance for impact structures on Mars. Meteorit Planet Sci, 41:1613–1624.
20.
HortonJ.W.Jr., KunkM.J., BelkinH.E., AleinikoffJ.N., JacksonJ.C., and ChouI.M. (2009) Evolution of crystalline target rocks and impactites in the Chesapeake Bay impact structure, ICDP-USGS Eyreville B core. Geol Soc Am Special Paper, 458:266–316.
21.
JacksonJ.C., HortonJ.W.Jr., ChouI.M., and BelkinH.E. (2011) Monoclinic tridymite in clast-rich impact melt rock from the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Am Mineral, 96:81–88.
22.
JacksonJ.C., HortonJ.W.Jr., ChuoI.M., and BelkinH.E. (2016) Coesite in suevites from the Chesapeake Bay impact structure. Meteorit Planet Sci, 51:946–965.
23.
LallaE.A., Lopez-ReyesG., SansanoA., Sanz-ArranzA., Martínes-FriasJ., MedinaJ., and Rull-PérezF. (2016a) Raman-IR vibrational and XRD characterization of ancient and modern mineralogy from volcanic eruption in Tenerife Island: implication for Mars. Geosci Front, 7:673–681.
24.
LallaE.A., Sanz-ArranzA., Lopez-ReyesG., SansanoA., MedinaJ., SchmankeD., KlingelhoeferG., Rodríguez-LosadaJ.A., Martínez-FríasJ., and RullF. (2016b) Raman-Mossbauer-XRD studies of selected samples from “Los Azulejos” outcrop: a possible analogue for assessing the alteration processes on Mars. Adv Space Res, 57:2385–2395.
25.
Lopez-ReyesG. and Rull PerezF. (2017) A method for the automated Raman spectra acquisition. J Raman Spectrosc, 48:1654–1664.
26.
Lopez-ReyesG., RullF., VenegasG., WestallF., FoucherF., BostN., SanzA., Catalá-EspíA., VeasA., HermosillaI., SanasanoA., and MedinaJ. (2013) Analysis of the scientific capabilities of the ExoMars Raman laser spectrometer instrument. Eur J Mineral, 25:721–733.
27.
McMillanP.F., WolfG.H., and LambertP. (1992) A Raman spectroscopic study of shocked single crystalline quartz. Phys Chem Minerals, 19:71–79.
28.
OrmoJ., LindstromM., LepinetteA., Martinez-FriasJ., and Diaz-MartinezE. (2006) Cratering and modification of wet-targets craters: projectile impact experiments and field observations of the Lockne marine-target crater (Sweden). Meteorit Planet Sci, 41:1605–1612.
29.
OsinskiG.R., LeeP., ParnellJ., SprayJ.G., and BaronM. (2005) A case study of impact-induced hydrothermal activity: the Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Canadian High Arctic. Meteorit Planet Sci, 40:1859–1877.
30.
PrieurN.C., RolfT., WünnemannK., and WernerS.C. (2018) Formation of simple impact craters in layered targets: implication for lunar crater morphology and regolith thickness. J Geophys Res Planets, 123:1555–1578.
31.
Robolledo-VieyraM. and Urrutia-FucugauchiJ. (2010) Magnetostratigraphy of the impact breccias and post-impact carbonates from borehole Yaxcopoil-1, Chicxulub impact crater, Yucatán, Mexico. Meteorit Planet Sci, 39:821–829.
RullF., MauriceS., HutchinsonI., MoralA., PerezC., DiazC., ColomboM., BelenguerT., Lopez-ReyesG., SansanoA., ForniO., ParotY., StriebigN., WoodwardS., HoweC., TarceaN., RodriguezP., SeoaneL., SantiagoA., Rodriguez-PrietoJ.A., MedinaJ., GallegoP., CanchalR., SantamaríaP., RamosG., and VagoJ.L. (2017) The Raman laser spectrometer for the ExoMars rover mission to Mars. Astrobiology, 17:627–654.
34.
SaizJ., Lopez-ReyesG., GuzmánA., Moreno-DominguezD., RullF., PerezC., and MoralA.G. (2018) Instrument data analysis tool (IDAT) for the analysis of RLS data. In Proceeding from the GeoRaman Conference, Catania, Italy.
35.
SanfordW.E. (2005) A simulation of the hydrothermal response to the Chesepeake Bay bolide impact. Geofluids, 5:185–201.
36.
SprayJ.G., ThompsonL.M., BirenM.B., and O'Connell-CooperC. (2010) The Manicouagan impact structure as a terrestrial analogue site for lunar and martian planetary science. Planet Space Sci, 58:538–551.
37.
SturmS., WulfG., JungD., and KenkmannT. (2013) The Ries impact, a double-layer rampart crater on Earth. Geology, 41:531–534.
38.
TreimanA.H., AmundsenH.E.F., BlakeD.F., and BunchT. (2002) Hydrothermal origin for carbonate globules in Martian meteorite ALH84001: a terrestrial analogue from Spitsbergen (Norway). Earth Planet Sci Lett, 204:323–332.
39.
WernerS.C., BibringJ.P., BultelB., Casanova RoqueC., CarterJ., CousinA., DypvikH., GuzmanA., HammV., HellevangH., LantzC., ManriqueJ.A., MauriceS., Medina GarciaJ., NavarroR., NeumannE.R., PilorgetC., PouletF., RiuL., Rull PerezF., SaetreC., Sansano CaramazanaA., Sanz ArranzA., Sobron GrañónF., VenerandaM., and ViennetJ.-C. (2018) The Planetary Terrestrial Analogues Library (PTAL). In Proceeding from the International Mars Sample Return Conference, Berlin, Germany.
40.
WünnemannK., ZhuM.H., and StöfflerD. (2016) Impacts into quartz sand: crater formation, shock metamorphism, distribution in laboratory experiments and numerical model. Meteorit Planet Sci, 51:1762–1794.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
