DeflorinC, HohenauerE, StoopR, et al.Physical management of scar tissue: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Altern Complement Med, 2020; 26:854–865.
2.
MarshHW, HauKT, BallaJR, et al.Is more ever too much? The number of indicators per factor in confirmatory factor analysis. Multivariate Behav Res, 1998; 33:181–220.
3.
VercelliS, FerrieroG, SartorioF, et al.Clinimetric properties and clinical utility in rehabilitation of postsurgical scar rating scales: A systematic review. Int J Rehabil Res, 2015; 38:279–286.
4.
VercelliS, FerrieroG, SartorioF, et al.How to assess postsurgical scars: A review of outcome measures. Disabil Rehabil, 2009; 31:2055–2063.
5.
TyackZ, WasiakJ, SpinksA, et al.A guide to choosing a burn scar rating scale for clinical or research use. Burns, 2013; 39:1341–1350.
6.
FearmontiR, BondJ, ErdmannD, et al.A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty, 2010; 10:e43–e43.
7.
NedelecB, ShankowskyH, TredgetE. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: Comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume. J Burn Care Rehabil, 2000; 21:205–212.
8.
SullivanT, SmithJ, KermodeJ, et al.Rating the burn scar. J Burn Care Rehabil, 1990; 11:256–260.
9.
BrusselaersN, PirayeshA, HoeksemaH, et al.Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of different scar scales. J Surg Res, 2010; 164:e115–e123.
10.
KaragozH, YukselF, UlkurE, et al.Comparison of efficacy of silicone gel, silicone gel sheeting, and topical onion extract including heparin and allantoin for the treatment of postburn hypertrophic scars. Burns, 2009; 35:1097–1103.
11.
MomeniM, HafeziF, RahbarH, et al.Effects of silicone gel on burn scars. Burns, 2009; 35:70–74.
12.
NedelecB, CoutureMA, CalvaV, et al.Randomized controlled trial of the immediate and long-term effect of massage on adult postburn scar. Burns, 2019; 45:128–139.
13.
MustoeTA, CooterRD, GoldMH, et al.International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002; 110:560–571.
14.
NakaokaH, MiyauchiS, MikiY. Proliferating activity of dermal fibroblasts in keloids and hypertrophic scars. Acta Derm Venereol, 1995; 75:102–104.
15.
FerrieroG, VercelliS, SalgovicL, et al.Validation of a new device to measure postsurgical scar adherence. Phys Ther, 2010; 90:776–783.
16.
CuaA, WilhelmK-P, MaibachH. Elastic properties of human skin: Relation to age, sex, and anatomical region. Arch Dermatol Res, 1990; 282:283–288.
17.
McOwanCG, MacDermidJC, WiltonJ. Outcome measures for evaluation of scar: A literature review. J Hand Ther, 2001; 14:77–85.
18.
BrusselaersN, PirayeshA, HoeksemaH, et al.Burn scar assessment: A systematic review of objective scar assessment tools. Burns, 2010; 36:1157–1164.
19.
van ZuijlenPP, AngelesAP, KreisRW, et al.Scar assessment tools: Implications for current research. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2002; 109:1108–1122.
20.
NguyenDQ, PotokarT, PriceP. A review of current objective and subjective scar assessment tools. J Wound Care, 2008; 17:101–102, 104–106.
21.
RodriguesL, Eemco. EEMCO guidance to the in vivo assessment of tensile functional properties of the skin. Part 2: Instrumentation and test modes. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol, 2001; 14:52–67.
22.
ParryI, WalkerK, NiszczakJ, et al.Methods and tools used for the measurement of burn scar contracture. J Burn Care Res, 2010; 31:888–903.
23.
PerryDM, McGroutherDA, BayatA. Current tools for noninvasive objective assessment of skin scars. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2010; 126:912–923.
