FisherP.What is homeopathy? An introduction. Front Biosci, 2012; 1669–1682.
2.
HahnemannS.Organon of the Rational Art of Healing [in German]. Dresden, Germany: Arnoldsche Buchhandlung, 1810.
3.
MathieRT.Controlled clinical studies of homeopathy. Homeopathy, 2015; 104:328–332.
4.
ArendtF.Journalist's attitudes towards homeopathy: Survey data from Germany. Complent Ther, 2016; 21:17–21.
5.
CiocănelA, RughinișC, FlahertyMG. Argumentative time work for legitimizing homeopathy: Temporal reasons for the acceptance of an alternative medical practice. Time Soc, 2020; 30:100–125.
6.
BhaskarabhatlaA.Regulating Pharmaceutical Prices in India: Policy Design, Implementation and Compliance. Cham: Springer, 2018.
7.
LoberaJ, Robero-GarcíaJ.Scientific appearance and homeopathy. Determinants of trust in complementary and alternative medicine. Health Communication, 2020 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1750764.
8.
OppK-D. Die Theory of rational action [in German]. In: DeckerO, ed. Sozialpsychologie und Sozialtheorie Band 1: Zugänge. Wiesbaden: Springer, 2018:61–76.
9.
BeckerGS.The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1976.
10.
OppK-D.Sociology and economic man. J Theor Inst Econ, 1985; 141:213–243.
11.
OppK-D.Contending conceptions of the theory of rational action. J Theor Polit, 1999; 11:171–202.
12.
EsserH.The rationality of everyday behavior. Ration Soc, 1993; 5:7–31.
McKenzieRB, TullockG. The New World of Economics. 2nd ed. Homewood, IL: Irwin, 1978.
16.
LindenbergS.An Assessment of the new political economy: Its potential for the social sciences and for sociology in particular. Sociol Theor, 1985; 3:99–114.
17.
EmrichE, FollertF. Those who are said to be dead live longer! Some remarks on homo oeconomicus as a method [in German]. Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter, 2019; 66:337–347.
18.
StubT, KristoffersenAE, OvervågG, et al.Adverse effects in homeopathy. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Explore (NY). [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2020.11.008.
19.
TeminP.Taking Your Medicine: Drug Regulation in the United States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
20.
dos SantosAP, CardosoTN, WaisseS, BonaminLV. Homeopathy in experimental cancer models: A systematic review. Homeopathy, 2020 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1716369
21.
LindeK.The specific placebo effect [in German]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt—Gesundheitsforschung—Gesundheitsschutz, 2006; 8:729–735.
22.
MoseleyB, O'MalleyK, PetersenNJ, et al.A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med, 2002; 347:81–88.
23.
LindeK, MelchartD. Randomized controlled trials of individualized homeopathy: A state-of-the-art review. J Altern Complement Med, 1998; 4:371–388.
24.
CucheratM, HaughMC, GoochM, BoisselJ-P. Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy A meta-analysis of clinical trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol, 2000; 56:27–33.
25.
ShangA, et al.Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homeopathy and allopathy. Lancet, 2005; 366:726–732.
26.
SlovicP.Perception of risk. Science, 1987; 236:280–285.
27.
RossiE, Di StefanoM, FirenzuoliF, et al.Add-on complementary medicine in cancer care: evidence in literature and experiences of integration. Medicines (Basel), 2017; 4:5.
28.
FrassM, LechleitnerP, GründlingCet al. Homeopathic treatment as an add-on therapy may improve quality of life and prolong survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-arm, multicenter study. Oncologist, 2020; 25:e1930–e1955.
29.
von MisesL.Human Action. A Treatise on Economics, The Scholar's Ed. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1998 [1949].
30.
SchneiderU.Information asymmetries on both sides in the Doctor-patient relationship: implications for the German statutory health insurance [in German]. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 2002; 71:447–458.
31.
PosnerRA.Rational choice, behavioral economics, and the law. Stan L Rev, 1998; 50:1551–1575.
32.
FreyBS.From economic imperialism to social science inspiration. Public Choice, 1993; 77:95–105.
33.
FreyBS, StutzerA, eds. Economics and Psychology: A Promising New Cross-Disciplinary Field. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press.
34.
TverskyA, KahnemanD. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 1974; 185:1124–1131.
35.
KahnemanD, TverskyA. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979; 47:263–291.
36.
FreyBS, EichenbergerR. Should social scientists care about choice anomalies?. Ration Soc, 1989; 1:101–122.
37.
Federal law on the exercise of the medical profession and professional representation of doctors (Ärztegesetz 1998 – ÄrzteG 1998) [in German]. Online document at: https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10011138, accessed March17, 2021.