Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background:

Medical research news provided through the World Wide Web is easily accessible to the general public. Thus, it is necessary to understand how research findings released from online news sources are portrayed.

Methods:

The sample includes articles (n=205) published between January 1, 2010 and June 18, 2010 in top online news sites with competitive traffic rankings in the United States as determined by Alexa.com. Google Reader was used to find health-related news articles corresponding to the relevant news sources. Data analysis was performed using SPSS with two-tailed significance values of the χ² statistic.

Results:

A content analysis (n=205 stories) revealed that the majority of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities for cancer discussed in top online news sources are classified as nutritional therapeutics, and the cancer topic that appeared most frequently was that of prevention. General oncology was the most frequently cited cancer type that was discussed with regard to CAM. Medical journals were the most frequently cited source in CAM/cancer news articles. The majority of news stories on CAM/cancer were neutral in tone, and the relationship between tone and evidence type reported was statistically significant. Observational studies rather than randomized controlled trials were the predominant form of evidence provided for research findings.

Conclusions:

Overall, the quality of how online news sources report research findings on complementary and alternative medicine therapies for cancer is fairly high. However, certain top online media sources are more reliable and informative than others when it comes to reporting about CAM remedies for cancer.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. http://nccam.nih.gov/. 2010 June 17.

Antman

, Benson

, Chabot

et al. Complementary and alternative medicine: The role of the cancer center. J Clin Oncol, 2001; 19,18 suppl:55S–60S.

Gansler

, Kaw

, Crammer

, Smith

. A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: A report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer, 2008; 113:1048–1057.

Barnes

, Bloom

, Nahin

. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007. Natl Health Stat Report, December 10, 2008. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19361005. 2010 May 1.

Eisenberg

, Davis

, Ettner

et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990–1997: Results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA, 1998; 280:1569–1575.

Tindle

, Wolsko

, Davis

et al. Factors associated with the use of mind body therapies among United States adults with musculoskeletal pain. Complement Ther Med, 2005; 13:155–164.

Hesse

, Nelson

, Kreps

et al. Trust and sources of health information: The impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers. Findings from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med, 2005; 165:2618–2624.

Weber

, Derrico

, Yoon

, Sherwill-Navarro

. Educating patients to evaluate web-based health care information: The GATOR approach to healthy surfing. J Clin Nurs, 2010; 19:1371–1377.

Mayer

, Terrin

, Kreps

et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: A comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ Couns, 2007; 65:342–343.

10.

Stryker

, Fishman

, Emmons

, Viswanath

. Cancer risk communication in mainstream and ethnic newspapers. Prev Chronic Dis, 2009; 6:A23.

11.

Stryker

, Emmons

, Viswanath

. Uncovering differences across the cancer control continuum: A comparison of ethnic/minority and mainstream cancer newspaper stories. Prev Med, 2007; 44:20–25.

12.

Ayers

, Kronenfeld

. Chronic illness and health-seeking information on the Internet. Health Interdiscipl J Soc Study Health Illness Med, 2007; 11:327–347.

13.

White

, Horvitz

. Cyberchondria: Studies of the escalation of medical concerns in Web search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst., 27,4Article 23November 2009. http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/default.aspx?=76529. 2010 October 25.

14.

Gansler

, Henley

, Stein

et al. Sociodemographic determinants of cancer treatment health literacy. Cancer, 2005; 104:653–660.

15.

Alexa Internet, Inc. About the Alexa Traffic Rankings. www.alexa.com/help/traffic-learn-more. 2011 May 24.

16.

Alexa Internet Inc. Top Sites. www.alexa.com/topsites. 2010 June 10.

17.

About.com Really Simple Syndication (RSS) RDF Site Summary. http://webdesign.about.com/od/rss/a/what_is_rss.htm. October 30 .

18.

Office of Cancer Complementary and Alternative Medicine. www.cancer.gov/CAM/health_categories.html. 2010 June 17.

19.

Lai

WYY

, Lane

, Jones

. Sources and coverage of medical news reported on front pages of U.S. newspapers. PLoS One, 2009; 4:e6856.

20.

National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (DCCPS). Cancer Trends Progress Reports—2009/2010 Update: Prevention. http://quitsmoking.about.com/od/tobaccostatistics/a/cancerstats.htm. 2011 March 30.

21.

Soares

, Kumar

, Daniels

et al.

Evaluation of new treatments in radiation oncology: Are they better than standard treatments?

JAMA, 2005; 293:970–978.

22.

Grann

, Grann

. The case for randomized trials in cancer treatment: New is not always better. JAMA, 2005; 8:1001–1003.

23.

Fisher

, Gaynor

, Dahlberg

et al. A phase III comparison of CHOP vs m-BACOD vs ProMACE-CytaBOM vs MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study. Ann Oncol, 1994; 5,suppl2:91–95.

24.

Bruner

, Movsas

, Konski

et al. Outcomes research in cancer clinical trial cooperative groups: The RTOG model. Qual Life Res, 2004; 13:1025–1041.

25.

Stryker

, Emmons

, Viswanath

. Uncovering differences across the cancer control continuum: A comparison of ethnic and mainstream cancer newspaper stories. Prev Med, 2007; 44:20–25.

Portrayal of Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Cancer by Top Online News Sites

Abstract

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Get full access to this article

References