The public can be considered as a communication field with three main actors: speakers, communicators, and the audience. The characteristics of these actors and the features of their interaction constitute the social infrastructure of public knowledge production. There is both theoretical reason and practical evidence to suggest that the mass media tend to construct science stories in terms of spectacular events, simple causes and unambiguous moral positions. These tendencies create some elementary problems where `science meets the public'. By `popularization' the distance between the communication systems of science and of the public can be reduced but not eliminated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Peters, H. P., 1992, Risikokommunikation in Massenmedien. Journalismus zwischen Experten und Rezipientenerwartungen (Jülich: Mimeo/Forschungszentrum) pp.3-4.
2.
Habermas, J., 1962, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit (Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand) p.53.
Mayhew, L. , 1990, The differentiation of the solidary public. Differentiation Theory and Social Change, edited by J. C. Alexander and P. Colomy (New York: Columbia University), p. 305.
5.
Gerhards, J., and Neidhardt, F., 1990, Strukturen und Funktionen moderner Öffentlichkeit (Berlin: WZB-Paper FS III 90-101).
6.
Bateson, G. , 1972, Steps to an Ecology of Mind (San Francisco: Chandler) p. 315.
7.
Burgoon, M. , and Bettinghaus, E. P., 1990, Persuasive message strategies. Persuasion: New Directions in Theory and Research, edited by M. E. Roloff and G. R. Miller (Beverly Hills, London: Sage), p. 151.
8.
Pomerantz, A. , 1986, Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
9.
Galtung, J. , and Ruge, M. H., 1965, The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2, 64-91.
10.
Gans, H. , 1979, Deciding what's News (New York: Pantheon).
11.
Schulz, W., 1976, Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien. (Freiburg, München: Alber).
12.
Funkhouser, R. , 1973, The issues of the sixties: an exploratory studie in the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37, 73.
13.
Nelkin, D. , 1987, Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (New York: Freeman) p. 175.
14.
Best, J. , 1987, Rhetoric in claims-making: constructing the missing children problem. Social Problems, 34, 101-120.
15.
Weiss, H.-J., 1989, Öffentliche Streitfragen und massenmediale Argumentationsstrukturen. Massenkommunikation. Theorien, Methoden, Befunde, edited by M. Kaase and W. Schulz, Sonderheft 30, der `Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie' (Opladen: Westdeutscher), pp.487.
16.
Kepplinger, H. M., Ehmig, S. C., and Ahlheim, C., 1991, Gentechnik im Widerstreit. Zum Verhältnis von Wissenschaft und Journalismus. (Frankfurt a.M., New York: Campus) p.17.
17.
Merton, R. K. , 1957, Social theory and social structure. Science and Democratic Social Structure. (New York: Free Press) pp. 48-52.
18.
Hilgartner, S. , 1990, The dominant view of popularization: conceptual problems, political uses. Social Studies of Science, 20, 522.
Sherman, L. W. , 1989, The mobilization of scandal. Political Corruption: A Handbook, edited by A. J. Heidenheimer, M. Johnston and V. T. Levine (New Brunswick, Oxford: Transaction), pp. 887-911.
21.
Ebbighausen, R., and Neckel, S., 1989, Anatomie des politischen Skandals (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp).
22.
Whitley, R. , 1985, Knowledge producers and knowledge acquirers: popularization as a relation between scientific fields and their publics. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularization, edited by T. Shinn and R. Whitley (Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster: Reidel), pp. 3-30.
23.
Habermas, J., 1992, Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp) p.422.
24.
Hayes, D. P. , 1992, The growing inaccessibility of science. Nature, 356, 739-740.
