Increasing public understanding of transgenic crops through the World Wide Web

Abstract

Transgenic crops are among the most controversial “science and society” issues or recent years. Because of the complex techniques involved in creating these crops and the polarized debate over their risks and benefits, a critical need has arisen for accessible and balanced information on this technology. World Wide Web sites offer several advantages for disseminating information on a fast-changing technical topic, including their global accessibility; and their ability to update information frequently, incorporate multimedia formats, and link to networks of other sites. An alliance between two complementary web sites at Colorado State University and the University of Nebraska-Lincoln takes advantage of the web environment to help fill the need for public information on crop genetic engineering. This article describes the objectives and features of each site. Viewership data and other feedback have shown these web sites to be effective means of reaching public audiences on a complex scientific topic.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

National Agricultural Statistics Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture , “Acreage,” (June 29, 2001). Available online at http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bba/acrg2001.txt.

C. James , “Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2000,” ISAAA Briefs no. 23-2001 (2001), International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY. Available online at http://www.isaaa.org/publications/briefs/Brief_23.htm

James , “Global Review.”

A. M. Walmsley and C. J. Arntzen , “Plants for delivery of edible vaccines,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology 11, no. 2 (2000): 126-129.

M. Lappe , B. Bailey , and M. Lappe , Against the Grain: Biotechnology and the Corporate Takeover of Your Food (Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press, 1999).

L. Zimmerman , P. Kendall , M. Stone , and T. Hoban , “Consumer knowledge and concern about biotechnology and food safety,” Food Technology 48, no. 11 (1994): 71-77.

T. J. Hoban and L. D. Katic , “American consumer views on biotechnology,” Cereal Foods World 43, no. 1 (1998): 50-53.

Hoban and Katic , “American consumer views on biotechnology.”

S. Fritz , S. Ward , P. Byrne , K. Harms , and D. Namuth , “Agricultural biotechnology training for extension educators,” Journal of Extension (submitted).

10.

For example, “Engaged Institutions' Role in Biotechnology Education,” Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, Oct. 8-10, 2000. Available online at http://www.biotech.iastate.edu/publications/Oct_sympsoium/symposium_oct2000.html).

11.

Available online at http://www.colostate.edu/programs/lifesciences/TransgenicCrops.

12.

The animated sequence is available online at http://www.colostate.edu/programs/lifesciences/TransgenicCrops/animation.html.

13.

Anonymous , The Scout Report 7, no. 16 (September 1, 2000), Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison (http://scout.cs.wisc.edu/report/sr/2000/scout-000901.html).

14.

D. King, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, personal communication.

15.

T.C. Nesbitt, Cornell University, personal communication.

16.

D. Golick, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, personal communication.

17.

Available online at http://croptechnology.unl.edu/.

18.

P. Sandman . Responding to Community Outrage: Strategies for Effective Risk Communication (Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, 1993).

19.

B. Fischoff and I. Fischoff , “Publics' opinions about biotechnologies,” AgBioForum 4, nos. 3 & 4 (2001), (http://www.agbioforum.org/).

20.

S. Miller , “Public understanding of science at the crossroads,” Public Understanding of Science 10, no. 1 (2001): 115-120.

21.

S. Miller , “Public understanding of science at the crossroads.”

22.

Einsiedal et al. , “Publics at the technology table.”

23.

C. Zimmerman , G. L. Bisanz , J. Bisanz , J. S. Klein , and P, Klein , “Science at the supermarker: a comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know,” Public Understanding of Science 10, no. 1 (2001): 37-58.