We are concerned with a particular rhetorical narrative that appeared in the early stages of the Darwin debate but that has been fiercely resurgent in the past two decades. Freud wrote of Darwin's theory as one of three major blows to which human vanity had been submitted at the hands of science. Assertions that “Darwin's dangerous idea” came as a horrible shock to the Victorians and that it is still a profound psychological threat, and therefore widely resisted, remain current.
When such assertions are offered as the premise on which Darwin is to be approached by the general reader, they call for some detailed scrutiny, with regard both to the bases on which they are made, and the effect they have on the terms of public debate. This paper offers a critique of the culture-shock myth based on a re-examination of Victorian reactions to Darwin's work, and on an analysis of the ways in which the myth functions as a rhetorical strategy in our own time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Thomas Henry Huxley , Man's Place in Nature and Other Essays (London: Dent, 1911), 356.
2.
Huxley , Man's Place in Nature, p. 371.
3.
Huxley , Man's Place in Nature, p. 366.
4.
Sigmund Freud , “Fixation to traumas—the unconscious,” in Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Vol. 1, ed. James Strachey (London: Pelican, 1976), 326.
5.
Richard Dawkins, statement made in The Descent of Man, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Radio National, Episode 1, 22 Jan. 1999. Transcript available online at www.abc.net.au/rn/science.
6.
Stephen Jay Gould , “Boyle's law and Darwin's details,”Natural History104, no. 8 (1995): 8.
7.
John Gribbin and Mary, Darwin in 90 Minutes (London: Constable, 1997).
8.
Paul Strathern , Darwin and Evolution (London: Arrow, 1998).
9.
Janet Radcliffe Richards , Human Nature after Darwin: A Philosophical Introduction (London: Routledge, 2000), 1.
10.
Mathew Sweet , Inventing the Victorians (London: Faber, 2002).
11.
Bram Dijkstra , Idols of Perversity (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 161.
12.
Djikstra , Idols of Perversity, p. 162.
13.
Michael Ruse , The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 86.
14.
Peter J. Bowler , The Non-Darwinian Revolution; Reinterpreting a Historical Myth (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988), 15.
15.
Peter J. Bowler , Charles Darwin: the Man and his Influence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 11, 94.
16.
Bowler , Charles Darwin: the Man and his Influence, pp, 107, 100, 89.
17.
Adrian Desmond and James Moore, Darwin (London: Penguin, 1992), 477.
18.
in Desmond and Moore, Darwin.
19.
Desmond and Moore, Darwin, p. 659.
20.
Desmond and Moore, Darwin, p. 660.
21.
Desmond and Moore, Darwin, p. 477.
22.
Desmond and Moore, Darwin, p. 498.
23.
The Quarterly Review, vol. 108, July 1860, 225.
24.
Quarterly Review, July 1860, p. 231.
25.
Quarterly Review, July 1860, p. 237.
26.
Huxley , Man's Place in Nature, p. 319.
27.
Quarterly Review, July 1860, p. 256.
28.
Alvar Ellegård , Darwin and the General Reader: The Reception of Darwin's Theory of Evolution on the British Periodical Press, 1859-1872 (Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothenburgensis, 1958), 39.
29.
Huxley , Man's Place in Nature, p. 301.
30.
Adrian Desmond , Huxley (London: Penguin, 1998), 445.
31.
David N. Livingstone , “Science, region and religion: the reception of Darwinism in Princeton, Belfast and Edinburgh,” in Ronald N. Numbers and John Stenhouse, eds., Disseminating Darwinism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 7.
32.
Livingstone , “Science, region, and religion,” p. 16.
33.
Livingstone , “Science, region, and religion,” p. 86.
34.
Cited in David N. Livingston, Darwin's Forgotten Defenders: the Encounter Between Evangelical Theory and Evolutionary Thought (Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans, 1987), 129.
35.
Ronald N. Numbers , Darwinism Comes to America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 41.
36.
Peter Doherty , “The Map of life,”lecture given at the National Library of Australia, transcript from ABC Radio National broadcast on 19 August 2001. Available online at www.abc.au/rn.
37.
Desmond and Moore, Darwin, p. 666.
38.
Ellegård , Darwin and the General Reader, p. 106.
39.
Livingstone , “Science, region, and religion,” p. 12.
40.
Jane Goodall , Performance and Evolution in the Age of Darwin (London: Routledge, 2002).
41.
James A. Secord , Victorian Sensation: the Extraordinary Publication, Reception and Secret Authorship of Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), 514.
42.
Secord , Victorian Sensation, p. 516.
43.
Ellegård , Darwin and the General Reader, pp. 92-93.
44.
Henry Adams , The Education of Henry Adams (London: Penguin, 1995), 216-217.
45.
Richard Dawkins , The Blind Watchmaker (London: Penguin, 1988), xv.
46.
Adams , The Education of Henry Adams, pp. 222-223.
47.
Leo Tolstoy , Anna Karenina, trans. Constance Garnett (New York: The Modern Library, 2000), 533.
48.
Mary Midgley , Science as Salvation: a Modern Myth and its Meaning (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 79.
49.
Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy , The Origins of Complex Language (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1999), 231.
50.
Richard Dawkins , The Selfish Gene, new edition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).
51.
Radcliffe Richards , Human Nature after Darwin, p. 13.
52.
Radcliffe Richards , Human Nature after Darwin, p. 11.
53.
Daniel Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life (London: Penguin, 1995), 19.
54.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, pp. 19, 22.
55.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 25.
56.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, pp. 515, 514.
57.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 515.
58.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 516.
59.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 519.
60.
Edward O. Wilson , Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (London: Abacus, 1998), 275.
61.
Merryl Wyn Davies , Darwin and Fundamentalism (Cambridge: Icon, 2000), 58.
62.
Dorothy Nelkin , “Less selfish than sacred? Genes and the religious impulse in evolutionary psychology,” in Alas, Poor Darwin: Arguments Against Evolutionary Psychology, ed. Hilary Rose and Steven Rose (London: Jonathan Cape, 2000), 14-27.
63.
Freeman Dyson , “The scientist as rebel,” in Nature's Imagination: The Frontiers of Scientific Vision, ed. John Cornwell (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), 17.
64.
Wilson , Consilience, p. 274.
65.
Dennett , Darwin's Dangerous Idea, p. 521.
66.
Dawkins , The Selfish Gene, p. 193.
67.
Lorraine Daston and Katharine Park, Wonders and the Order of Nature (New York: Zone, 1998), 17.
68.
Michel Serres , with Bruno Latour, Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time, trans. Roxanne Lapidus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995), 137-138.
69.
Mike Michael , “Between citizen and consumer: multiplying the meanings of the `public understanding of science',”Public Understanding of Science7 (1998): 318.
