Insights into the Damage Mechanism of Teflon® FEP from the Hubble Space Telescope

Abstract

Metallized Teflon® FEP (fluorinated ethylene propylene) thermal control material on the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has been found to be degrading in the space environment. Teflon® FEP thermal control blankets (space-facing FEP) retrieved during the first servicing mission (SM1) were found to be embrittled on solar-facing surfaces and contained microscopic cracks. During the second servicing mission (SM2) astronauts noticed that the FEP outer layer of the multi-layer insulation (MLI) covering the telescope was cracked in many locations around the telescope. Large cracks were observed on the light shield, forward shell and equipment bays. A tightly curled piece of cracked FEP from the light shield was retrieved during SM2 and was severely embrittled, as witnessed by ground testing. A failure review board was organized to determine the mechanism causing the MLI degradation. Density, x-ray crystallinity and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses of the FEP retrieved during SM1 were inconsistent with results of FEP retrieved during SM2. Because the retrieved SM2 material was curled while in space, it experienced a higher temperature extreme during thermal cycling, estimated at 200°C, than the SM1 material, estimated at 50°C. An investigation on the effects of heating pristine FEP and FEP retrieved from the HST was therefore conducted. Samples of pristine, SM1 and SM2 FEP were heated to 200°C and evaluated for changes in density and morphology. Elevated-temperature exposure was found to have a major impact on the density of the retrieved materials. The characterization of the polymer morphology of the as-received and heated FEP by NMR provided results that were consistent with the density results. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was conducted on pristine, SM1 and SM2 FEP. DSC results provided evidence of chain scission and increased crystallinity in the space exposed FEP, which supported the density and NMR results. Samples exposed to simulated solar flare x-rays, thermal cycling and long-term thermal exposure provided information on the environmental contributions to degradation. These findings have provided insight into the damage mechanisms of FEP in the space environment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

[1] Hansen P A , Townsend J A , Yoshikawa Y , Castro D J , Triolo J J and Peters W C 1998 SAMPE Int. Symp. 43 570-570

[2] Zuby T M , de Groh K K and Smith D C 1995 Proc. Hubble Space Telescope Solar-Array Workshop, ESA WPP-77, p 385-385

Zuby T M , de Groh K K and Smith D C 1995 Proc. Hubble Space Telescope Solar-Array Workshop, NASA Technical Memorandum 104627-104627

[3] de Groh K K , and Smith D C 1997 NASA Technical Memorandum 113153-113153

[4] Van Eesbeek M , Levadou F and Milintchouk A 1995 Proc. Hubble Space Telescope Solar-Array Workshop, ESA WPP-77, p 403-403

[5] Townsend J A , Hansen P A , Dever J A , de Groh K K , Banks B A , Wang L and He C 1999 High Perform. Polym. 11 81–99

[6] Dever J A, de Groh K K, Townsend J A and Wang L 1998 AIAA-98-0895

Dever J A , de Groh K K , Townsend J A and Wang L 1998 NASA Technical Memorandum 206618-206618

[7] Dever J A , Townsend J A , Gaier J R and Jalics A I 1998 SAMPE Int. Symp. 43 616-616

10.

[8] Banks B A , de Groh K K , Stueber T J and Sechkar E A 1998 SAMPE Int. Symp. 43 1523-1523

11.

Banks B A , de Groh K K , Stueber T J and Sechkar E A 1998 NASA Technical Memorandum 207914-207914

12.

[9] Gaier J R , Brinkmeier M R and Gaier E M 1998 20th Space Simulation Conf., NASA Conference Report 208598 p 211-211

13.

[10] Dever J A , de Groh K K , Banks B A and Townsend J A 1999 High Perform. Polym. 11 123–140

14.

[11] de Groh K K , Gaier J R , Hall R L , Norris M J , Espe M P and Cato D R 1999 SAMPE Int. Symp. 44 1014-1014

15.

[12] Dever J A , de Groh K K , Banks B A , Townsend J A , Barth J L , Thomson S , Gregory T and Savage W 1999 SAMPE Int. Symp. 44 999-999

16.

[13] de Groh K K , Banks B A , Sechkar E A and Scheiman D A 1998 4th Int. Space Conf. on Protection of Materials and Structures from the LEO Space Environment, NASA Technical Memorandum 207426-207426

17.

[14] de Groh K K et al 2000 Chemical structural studies of as-received and heated Teflon® FEP from the Hubble Space Telescope NASA Technical Memorandum

18.

[15] McCrum N G 1959 Makromol. Chem. 34 50–66

19.

[16] Eby R K and Wilson F C 1962 J. Appl. Phys. 33 2951–2955

20.

[17] Farrelly D (DuPont) private communication

21.

[18] Mark H F 1983 The Effects of Hostile Environments on Coatings and Plastics, (American Chemical Society Symposium Series 229) p 11-11

22.

[19] Du Pont Teflon® Fluorocarbon Resins Mechanical Design Data, Du Pont Product Information section II p 11-11

23.

[20] Reed R P , Schramm R E and Clark A F 1973 Cryogenics 67 67–82

24.

[21] Bowers G H and Lovejoy E R 1962 Ind. Eng. Chem. Product Res. Develop. 1 89-89

25.

[22] Rosenberg Y , Siegmann A , Narkis M and Shkolnik S 1992 J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 45 783-783

26.

[23] Jolly C E and Reed J C 1962 11th Annual Signal Corps Wire and Cable Symp. (Du Pont Publication) N63 20171

27.

[24] Townsend J A , Hansen P A , McClendon M W , de Groh K K and Banks B A 1999 High Perform. Polym. 11 63–79