The Palmeirópolis Zn-Pb-Cu volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit consists of four areas, presenting distinct features regarding host rocks, the geometry of ore bodies, hydrothermal alteration, deformation intensity, and metal proportions. The seven modeled Zn-Pb-Cu ore bodies occur mainly along with the contact between the Mesoproterozoic acid and basic metavolcanics within amphibolite facies. Some characteristics such as the relation of higher Zn-Pb and Cu grades to a higher proportion of acid and basic metavolcanic host rocks respectively, the same metamorphic grade and the gradational contact between volcanic host rocks, and distribution of alteration halo suggest that the original stratigraphy is still preserved. A smooth folding superposing the initial tight folds that define the ore bodies indicates at least two deformation events after the Zn-Pb-Cu mineralisation in the Palmeirópolis deposit. Finally, the geometry of the 3D ore bodies in Palmeirópolis are discussed against other VMS deposits around the world with 3D data available in terms of age, metamorphic, and deformation grades.
AisengartT, BarbosaD, PlastowG, CoutoMA.Jr.2019. Inversion of electromagnetic and magnetic data and self-organizing maps applied to Palmeirópolis project.Sixteenth International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society & EXPOGEF: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, SBGf, p. 5
2.
AnnelsAE, HellewellEG.1987. The orientation of bedding, veins and joints in core – a new method and case history.Int J Min Geol Eng. 5:307–320. doi:10.1007/BF01560781.
3.
AraujoSM, FawcettJJ, ScottSD.1995. Metamorphism of hydrothermally altered rocks in a volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit: the Palmeiropolis, Brazil, example.Rev BrasGeociênc. 25:173–184.
4.
AraujoSM, ScottSD, LongstaffeFJ.1996. Oxygen isotope composition of alteration zones of highly metamorphosed volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits; Geco, Canada, and palmeiropolis, Brazil.Econ Geol. 91:697–712. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.91.4.697.
5.
AriasM, NuñezP, AriasD, GumielP, CastañónC, Fuertes-BlancoJ, Martin-IzardA.2021. 3D geological model of the Touro Cu deposit. A world-class mafic-siliciclastic VMS deposit in the NW of the Iberian Peninsula.Minerals. 11:85.
6.
BailesAH, GalleyAG.2000. Evolution of the Paleoproterozoic Snow Lake arc assemblage and geodynamic setting for associated volcanic-hosted massive sulphide deposits, Flin Flon Belt, Manitoba, Canada.Can J Earth Sci. 36:1789–1805. doi:10.1139/e98-111.
7.
BailesAH, GalleyAG, ParadisS, TaylorBE.2016. Variations in large synvolcanic alteration zones at Snow Lake, Manitoba, Canada, with proximity to associated volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits.Econ Geol. 111:933–962. doi:10.2113/econgeo.111.4.933.
8.
BarrieCT, HanningtonMD.1999. Classification of volcanic-associated massive sulfide deposits based on host-rock composition.Rev Econ Geol. 8:1–11.
9.
BassonIJ, CreusPK, AnthonissenCJ, StochB, EkkerdJ.2016. Structural analysis and implicit 3D modelling of high-grade host rocks to the Venetia kimberlite diatremes, Central Zone, Limpopo Belt, South Africa.J Struct Geol. 86:47–61. doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2016.03.002.
10.
BassonIJ, ThomasSAJ, StochB, AnthonissenCJ, McCallMJ, BritzJ, MacgregorS, ViljoenS, NelD, VietzeM, 2018. The structural setting of mineralisation at Kolomela mine, Northern Cape, South Africa, based on fully-constrained, implicit 3D modelling.Ore Geol Rev. 95:306–324. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.02.032.
11.
BauerTE, SkyttäP, HermanssonT, AllenRL, WeihedP.2014. Correlation between distribution and shape of VMS deposits and regional deformation patterns, Skellefte district, northern Sweden.Miner Deposita. 49:555–573. doi:10.1007/s00126-013-0503-2.
12.
BiondiJC, SantosRV, CuryLF.2013. The Paleoproterozoic Aripuanã Zn-Pb-Ag (Au, Cu) volcanogenic massive sulfide deposit, Mato Grosso, Brazil: geology, geochemistry of alteration, carbon and Oxygen isotope modeling, and implications for genesis.Econ Geol. 108:781–811. doi:10.2113/econgeo.108.4.781.
13.
ChmielowskiRM, JanssonN, PerssonMF, FagerströmP.2016. 3D modelling of hydrothermal alteration associated with VHMS deposits in the Kristineberg area, Skellefte district, northern Sweden.Miner Deposita. 51:113–130. doi:10.1007/s00126-014-0572-x.
14.
CowanEJ.2020. Deposit-scale structural architecture of the Sigma-Lamaque gold deposit, Canada – insights from a newly proposed 3D method for assessing structural controls from drill hole data.Miner Deposita. 55:217–240. doi:10.1007/s00126-019-00949-6.
CoxJJ, HoranS, ScholeyBJY, VasquezL.2021. Technical report on the Aripuanã zinc project, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil, NI 43-101 Technical Report: Canada, Roscoe Postle Associates, p. 313.
17.
CraigJr.1983. Metamorphic features in Appalachian massive sulphides.Mineral Mag. 47:515–525. doi:10.1180/minmag.1983.047.345.13.
18.
DardenneMA.2000. The Brasília fold belt. In: CordaniU. G., MilaniE. G., Thomaz FilhoA., CamposD. A., editor. Tectonic evolution of South America. Rio de Janeiro: 31st International Geological CongressSage UK: London, England; p. 231–264.
19.
de OliveiraSB, JohnsonCA, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS, LeachDL, CaranMGN.2021. Geology and genesis of the Shalipayco evaporite-related Mississippi Valley-type Zn–Pb deposit, Central Peru: 3D geological modeling and C–O–S–Sr isotope constraints: Mineralium Deposita.10.1007/s00126-020-01029-w.
20.
de OliveiraSB, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS, TassinariCCG.2020. Structural control and timing of evaporite-related Mississippi Valley-type Zn–Pb deposits in Pucará group, Northern central Peru.J South Amer Earth Sci. 103:102736.
21.
de OliveiraSB, LeachDL, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS, JohnsonCA.2019. The Zn–Pb mineralization of Florida Canyon, an evaporite-related Mississippi Valley-type deposit in the Bongará district, Northern Peru: Econ Geol. 114:1621–1647. doi:10.5382/econgeo.4690.
22.
DuuringP, HassanL, ZelicM, GessnerK.2016. Geochemical and spectral footprint of metamorphosed and deformed VMS-style mineralization in the Quinns District, Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia.Econ Geol. 111:1411–1438. doi:10.2113/econgeo.111.6.1411.
23.
FigueiredoJA, Leão NetoR, ValenteCR.1981. Depósitos de sulfetos maciços de Zn, Cu e Pb da região de Palmeirópolis, GO.Simp Geol Centro Oeste Goiânia. 1981:422–441.
24.
FilhoF, PimentelCF, de AraujoMM, and LauxSM, H J. 2010. Layered intrusions and volcanic sequences in central Brazil: geological and geochronological constraints for Mesoproterozoic (1.25 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.79 Ga) igneous associations.Precambrian Res. 183:617–634. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2010.06.008.
FrascaAAS, RibeiroPSE.2019b. Evolução crustal e metalogenia da porção centro norte da faixa Brasília: estados do Tocantins e Goiás: Brasilia, CPRM, 318 p.https://rigeo.cprm.gov.br/handle/doc/21486.
28.
FruchtingA, BoniattiJH, HenriqueE, OliveiraGD, de OliveiraSB, PiresPFR.2009. Aplicação dos métodos eletromagnéticos aéreos e de polarização induzida espectral em mineralizações de cobre/zinco tipo VMS: 11th International Congress of the Brazilian Geophysical Society, Salvador, Bahia, 2009, 2009, p. 8.10.3997/2214-4609-pdb.195.1659_evt_6year_2009.
29.
GalleyAG, HanningtonMD, JonassonIR.2007. Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits. In: GoodfelloiwW. D., editor. Mineral deposits of Canada, a synthesis of major deposit types, district metallogeny, the evolution of geological provinces and exploration methods, Special Publication No. 5. Quebec: Geological Association of Canada Mineral Deposits DivisionSage UK: London, England; p. 141–161.
30.
GuoJ, WangJ, WuL, LiuC, LiC, LiF, LinM, JessellMW, LiP, DaiX, TangJ.2020. Explicit-implicit-integrated 3-D geological modelling approach: a case study of the Xianyan demolition volcano (Fujian, China).Tectonophysics. 795:228648. doi:10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228648.
31.
HaymanPC, HullSE, CasRAF, SummerhayesE, AmelinY, IvanicTJ, PriceD.2015. A new period of volcanogenic massive sulfide formation in the Yilgarn: a volcanological study of the ca 2.76 Ga Hollandaire VMS deposit, Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia.Aust J Earth Sci. 62:189–210. doi:10.1080/08120099.2015.1011399.
32.
HerzigPM, HanningtonMD.1995. Polymetallic massive sulfides at the modern seafloor a review.Ore Geol Rev. 10:95–115.
33.
HodgesDJ, ManojlovicPM.1993. Application of lithogeochemistry to exploration for deep VMS deposits in high grade metamorphic rocks, Snow Lake, Manitoba.J Geochem Explor. 48:201–224. doi:10.1016/0375-6742(93)90005-7.
34.
HumphrisSE, HerzigPM, MillerDJ, AltJC, BeckerK, BrownD, BrügmannG, ChibaH, FouquetY, GemmellJB, 1995. The internal structure of an active sea-floor massive sulphide deposit.Nature. 377:713–716.
35.
JessellM, AillèresL, De KempE, LindsayM, WellmannJF, HillierM, LaurentG, CarmichaelT, MartinR.2014. Next generation three-dimensional geologic modeling and inversion.Soc Econ Geol Spec Publ. 18:261–272.
36.
KampmannTC, JanssonNF, StephensMB, MajkaJ, LasskogenJ.2017. Systematics of hydrothermal alteration at the Falun base metal sulfide deposit and implications for ore genesis and exploration, Bergslagen Ore district, Fennoscandian Shield, Sweden ٭.Econ Geol. 112:1111–1152.
37.
KampmannTC, StephensMB, WeihedP.2016. 3D modelling and sheath folding at the Falun pyritic Zn-Pb-Cu-(Au-Ag) sulphide deposit and implications for exploration in a 1.9 Ga ore district, Fennoscandian Shield, Sweden.Miner Deposita. 51:665–680. doi:10.1007/s00126-016-0638-z.
38.
LargeRR.1992. Australian volcanic-hosted massive sulfide deposits; features, styles, and genetic models.Econ Geol. 87:471–510. doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.87.3.471.
39.
LargeRR, McPhieJ, GemmellJB, HerrmannW, DavidsonGJ.2001. The spectrum of Ore Deposit types, volcanic environments, alteration halos, and related exploration vectors in submarine volcanic successions: some examples from Australia.Econ Geol. 96:913–938.
LydonJW.1984. Ore Deposit Models - 8. volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits part I: a descriptive model.Geosci Can. 11.
42.
MarjoribanksR.2011. Geological methods in mineral exploration and mining. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag BerlinSage UK: London, England. 238 p.10.1007/978-3-540-74375-0.
43.
MarshallB, GilliganLB.1987. An introduction to remobilization: information from ore-body geometry and experimental considerations.Ore Geol Rev. 2:87–131. doi:10.1016/0169-1368(87)90025-4.
MarshallB, VokesFM, LarocqueACL.2000. Regional metamorphic remobilization: upgrading and formation of ore deposits.Rev Econ Geol. 11:19–38.
46.
Martin-IzardA, AriasD, AriasM, GumielP, SandersonDJ, CastañonC, LavandeiraA, SanchezJ.2015. A new 3D geological model and interpretation of structural evolution of the world-class Rio Tinto VMS deposit, Iberian Pyrite Belt (Spain).Ore Geol Rev. 71:457–476.
47.
McCutcheonSR.2011. “Durchbewegung” texture: what is it and does it occur in massive sulphide deposits of the Bathurst mining camp?atlantic Geology. 47:30.
48.
MoraesR, FuckRA, PimentelMM, GioiaSMCL, FigueiredoAMG.2003. Geochemistry and Sm–Nd isotopic characteristics of bimodal volcanic rocks of Juscelândia, sGoiás, Brazil: Mesoproterozoic transition from continental rift to ocean basin.Precambrian Res. 125:317–336. doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(03)00112-8.
49.
OliveiraWB.2000. Zinco, chumbo e cobre de Palmeirópolis, Estado do Tocantins: Brasilia, Brasil, CPRM, p. 19.
50.
Pérez-AguilarA, JulianiC.2016. Geology of metamorphic rocks deriving from paleohydrothermal systems in the Mesoproterozoic Serra do Itaberaba Group, São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil.J Maps. 12:101–107. doi:10.1080/17445647.2016.1165153.
51.
Pérez-AguilarA, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS, FallickAE, BettencourtJS.2005. Stable isotopic constraints on Kuroko-type paleohydrothermal systems in the Mesoproterozoic Serra do Itaberaba group, São Paulo State, Brazil.J South Amer Earth Sci. 18:305–321.
52.
PierceySJ.2011. The setting, style, and role of magmatism in the formation of volcanogenic massive sulfide deposits.Miner Deposita. 46:449–471. doi:10.1007/s00126-011-0341-z.
53.
SchetselaarE, AmesD, GrunskyE.2018. Integrated 3D geological modeling to gain insight in the effects of hydrothermal alteration on post-ore deformation style and strain localization in the Flin Flon volcanogenic massive sulfide ore system.Minerals. 8, 3.
54.
SchetselaarE, PehrssonS, DevineC, LafranceB, WhiteD, MalinowskiM.2016. 3-D geologic modeling in the Flin Flon mining district, trans-Hudson orogen, Canada: evidence for polyphase imbrication of the Flin Flon-777-Callinan volcanogenic massive sulfide ore system.Econ Geol. 111:877–901. doi:10.2113/econgeo.111.4.877
55.
SchetselaarEM.2013. Mapping the 3D lithofacies architecture of a VMS ore system on a curvilinear-faulted grid: A case study from the Flin Flon mining camp, Canada.Ore Geol Rev. 53:261–275. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.01.012.
56.
ShanksWC, KoskiRA, MosierDL, SchulzKJ, MorganLA, SlackJF, RidleyWI, Dusel-BaconC, SealRRII, PiatakNM.2012. Volcanogenic massive sulfide occurrence model: chapter C in mineral deposit models for resource assessment. In: Pat ShanksW. C., ThurstonR., editors. Scientific investigations report. Reston, VA: USGSSage UK: London, England; p. 345; doi: 10.3133/sir20105070C.
57.
StochB, AnthonissenCJ, McCallMJ, BassonIJ, DeaconJ, CloeteE, BothaJ, BritzJ, StrydomM, NelD, BesterM.2018. 3D implicit modeling of the Sishen mine: new resolution of the geometry and origin of Fe mineralization.Miner Deposita. 53:835–853. doi:10.1007/s00126-017-0784-y.
58.
VikentyevIV, BelogubEV, NovoselovKA, MoloshagVP.2017. Metamorphism of volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits in the Urals. Ore geology.Ore Geol Rev. 85:30–63. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2016.10.032.
59.
Wohlgemuth-UeberwasserCC, ViljoenF, McClungCR.2014. Metamorphic alteration of the massive sulfide horizon from the Salt River VMS deposit (South Africa).Ore Geol Rev. 56:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.07.005.
60.
WosniakR, DuqueTRF, JuniorMAC, MarquesED, BritoAAd, PereiraLF.2020. Relatório de reavaliação do patrimônio mineral-Área polimetálicos de Palmeirópolis: estado de Tocantins: Brasilia, Brasil, CPRM, p. 171.
61.
ZolenskyME, SylvesterPJ, PacesJB.1988. Origin and significance of blue coloration in quartz from Llano Rhyolite (llanite), north-central Llano County, Texas.Am Mineral. 73:313–323.
