Application of mineral norm calculation in the resource evaluation of the sulphide and non-sulphide Zn-Pb mineralisation of the Florida Canyon MVT deposit,Peru
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online September, 2019
Application of mineral norm calculation in the resource evaluation of the sulphide and non-sulphide Zn-Pb mineralisation of the Florida Canyon MVT deposit,Peru
Both Zn–Pb hypogene sulphide and Zn supergene non-sulphide mineralisation types occur in the Mississippi Valley-type deposit of Florida Canyon, located in northern Peru. The geometry and spatial relationship between the two ore types are very complex to interpret, when it comes to mineral resource evaluation. An algorithm using the Zn, Pb and S contents is proposed for the calculation of sphalerite, galena and non-sulphide norms in the block model after its conventional ordinary kriging estimation. Model validation was performed by comparing the results of the calculations with available SEM/EDS-MLA data. The results show good correlation between the calculated and the quantitative values, thus accrediting the proposed methodology. The algorithm is simple and fast to use and can be applied to mineral resource evaluation of Zn–Pb MVT deposits associated with non-sulphide mineralisation.
ArfèG, MondilloN, BalassoneG, BoniM, CappellettiP, Di PalmaT.2017a. Identification of Zn-bearing micas and clays from the Cristal and Mina Grande zinc deposits (Bongará Province, Amazonas region. Northern Peru).Minerals. 7:214–231. doi: 10.3390/min7110214
2.
ArfèG, MondilloN, BoniM, BalassoneG, JoachimskiM, MormoneA, DiPalmaT.2017b. The karst-hosted Mina Grande nonsulfide zinc deposit, Bongará District (Amazonas Region. Peru).Econ Geol. 112:1089–1110. doi: 10.5382/econgeo.2017.4503
3.
ArfèG, MondilloN, BoniM, JoachimskiM, BalassoneG, MormoneA, SantoroL, MedranoEC.2018. The Cristal Zn prospect (Amazonas region. Northern Peru). Part II: an example of supergene enrichments in tropical areas.Ore Geol Revs. 95:1076–1105. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.11.022
4.
BasukiNI, SpoonerETC.2009. Post-early cretaceous Mississippi Valley-type Zn-Pb mineralization in the Bongara Area, Northern Peru: fluid evolution and paleo flow from fluid inclusion evidence.Explor Min Geol. 18:25–39. doi: 10.2113/gsemg.18.1-4.25
5.
BasukiNI, TaylorBE, SpoonerETC.2008. Sulfur isotope evidence for thermochemical reduction of dissolved sulfate in Mississippi Valley-type zinc-lead mineralization, Bongara area, Northern Peru.Econ Geol. 103:783–799. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.103.4.783
6.
BerryRF, HerrmannW.2002. MINSQ – a least squares spreadsheet method for calculating mineral proportions from whole rock major element analyses.Geochem Explor Environ Anal. 2:361–368. doi: 10.1144/1467-787302-010
7.
BoniM, IannaceA, BalassoneG.1996. Base metal ores in the lower Palaeozoic of south-western Sardinia.Carbonate-hosted Lead-Zinc Deposits: Soc Econ Geol Special Publ. 4:18–28.
8.
BoniM, MondilloN.2015. The “calamines” and the “others”: The great family of supergene nonsulfide zinc ores.Ore Geol Rev. 67:208–233. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.10.025
9.
BouabdellahM, BrownAC, SangsterDF.1996. Mechanisms of formation of internal sediments at the Beddiane lead-zinc deposit, Touissit mining district, northeastern Morocco.Carbonate-hosted Lead-Zinc Deposits: Soc Econ Geol, Special Publ. 4:356–363.
10.
CohenD, WardCR.1991. SEDNORM—a program to calculate a normative mineralogy for sedimentary rocks based on chemical analyses.Comput Geosci. 17:1235–1253. doi: 10.1016/0098-3004(91)90026-A
11.
CohenDR, TaylorJC, WardCR.1999. Quantitative mineralogy of sandstones by X-ray diffractometry and normative analysis.J Sediment Res. 69:1050–1062. doi: 10.2110/jsr.69.1050
12.
CoppolaV, BoniM, GilgHA, Strzelska-SmakowskaB.2009. Nonsulfide zinc deposits in the Silesia–Cracow district, Southern Poland.Miner Deposita. 44:559–580. doi: 10.1007/s00126-008-0220-4
13.
de CaritatP, BlochJ, HutcheonI.1994. LPNORM: A linear programming normative analysis code.Comput Geosci. 20:313–347. doi: 10.1016/0098-3004(94)90045-0
14.
de OliveiraSB, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS.2019a. Mineral characterisation of the non-sulphide Zn mineralisation of the Florida Canyon deposit, Bongará district, northern Peru.Appl Earth Sci. 128:27–36. doi: 10.1080/25726838.2018.1556033
15.
de OliveiraSB, LeachDL, JulianiC, MonteiroLVS, JohnsonCA.2019b. The Zn–Pb mineralization of the Florida Canyon, an evaporite-related Mississippi Valley-type deposit in the Bongará District, Northern Peru.Econ Geol, Under Review.
16.
de OliveiraSB, RochaMM.2011. Krigagem indicadora aplicada aos litotipos do depósitode Ni-Cu de Americano do Brasil, GO.Geologia USP. Série Científica. 11:123–134. doi: 10.5327/Z1519-874X2011000200007
17.
HitzmanMW, ReynoldsNA, SangsterDF, AllenCR, CarmanCE.2003. Classification, genesis, and exploration guides for nonsulfide zinc deposits.Econ Geol. 98:685–714. doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.98.4.685
18.
HuntW, PenningtonJB, S DH, PoeckDH, OsbornJ, GilbertsonJ, TinucciJ.2017. NI 43-101 Technical Report Preliminary Economic Assessment Florida Canyon Zinc Project Amazonas Department, Peru. SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc., p. 217.
19.
JournelAG.1983. Nonparametric estimation of spatial distributions.J Int Assoc Math Geol. 15:445–468. doi: 10.1007/BF01031292
20.
KackstaetterUR.2014. SEDMIN-Microsoft Excel™ spreadsheet for calculating fine-grained sedimentary rock mineralogy from bulk geochemical analysis.Cent Eur J Geosci. 6:170–181.
21.
MondilloN, ArfèG, BoniM, BalassoneG, BoyceA, JoachimskiM, KangJS, VillaIM.2018a. The Cristal zinc prospect (Amazonas region, Northern Peru). Part I: New insights on the sulfide mineralization in the Bongará province.Ore Geol Rev. 94:261–276. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.01.021
22.
MondilloN, ArfèG, HerringtonR, BoniM, WilkinsonC, MormoneA.2018b. Germanium enrichment in supergene settings: evidence from the Cristal nonsulfide Zn prospect, Bongará district, northern Peru.Miner Deposita. 53:155–169. doi: 10.1007/s00126-017-0781-1
23.
MottaE, MoraesI, ApolonioP, RibeiroD, Cunha FilhoEM.2016. Incorporating mineralogical and density parameters in ferrous resource evaluation using mineralogical norm calculation – MNC.24th World Mining Congress; IBRAM, Rio de Janeiro, pp. 209–221.
24.
NyobeJB.1991. Application of normative calculations in quantitative comparative mineralogical studies of bauxite.Ore Geol Rev. 6:45–50. doi: 10.1016/0169-1368(91)90031-2
25.
PaktuncAD.1998. MODAN: an interactive computer program for estimating mineral quantities based on bulk composition.Comput Geosci. 24:425–431. doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00018-1
26.
PeixotoSF, HorbeAMC.2008. Bauxitas do nordeste do Amazonas.Revista Brasileira de Geociências. 38:406–422. doi: 10.25249/0375-7536.2008382406422
27.
ReichertJ.2007. A metallogenetic model for carbonate-hosted non-sulphide zinc deposits based on observations of Mehdi Abad and Irankuh. Central and Southwestern Iran. Halle-Wittenberg: Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg. p. 152.
28.
ReidCJ.2001. Stratigraphy and mineralization of the Bongara MVT zinc-lead district, northern Peru. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto. p. 179.
29.
RosenOM, AbbyasovAA, TipperJC.2004. MINLITH—an experience-based algorithm for estimating the likely mineralogical compositions of sedimentary rocks from bulk chemical analyses.Comput Geosci. 30:647–661. doi: 10.1016/j.cageo.2004.03.011
