Immobilisation of AsIII and AsV using alkali- and acid-bonded low temperature ceramics (LTCs), respectively, has been investigated. Arsenic was loaded into these matrices as solubilised arsenic or as a solid via precipitation with a metal nitrate. Where appropriate, samples were heated to 1000°C to consolidate their microstructure and reduce their open porosity. Samples were assessed according to microstructural characterisation and standard leaching protocols. Alkali-bonded LTCs, even after the application of a thermal treatment, did not bind arsenic sufficiently to pass a TCLP protocol, whereas acid bonded LTCs showed better potential for immobilising As. At a loading of 5 wt% As2O5, a TCLP leach test on an acid bonded LTC resulted in As levels of 7 ppm, close to the regulatory limit of 5 ppm As.
AdlT, VanceER.1982. Csalsi5o12: possible host for 137Cs immobilization. J Mater Sci. 17(3):849–855.
2.
ASTM. 2008. C1285-02, Standard test methods for determining chemical durability of nuclear, hazardous, and mixed waste glasses and multiphase glass ceramics. The Product Consistency Test (PCT). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
3.
BakharevT.2005. Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack. Cement and Concrete Res. 35(4):658–670.
4.
BarbosaVFF, MacKenzieKJD.2003. Thermal behaviour of inorganic geopolymers and composites derived from sodium polysialate. Mater Res Bull. 38(2):319–331.
5.
BissenM, FrimmelFH.2003. Arsenic – a review. Part 1: occurrence, toxicity, speciation, mobility. Acta Hydrochimica Hydrobiolica. 31(1):9–18.
6.
BruckardWJ, DaveyKJ, JorgensenFRA, WrightS, BrewD, HaqueN, VanceER.2010. Development of an integrated early removal process for the beneficiation of arsenic-bearing copper ores. Miner Eng. 23(15):1167–1173.
7.
CarterM, VanceER, AldridgeLP, ZawM, KhoeG.1994. Immobilisation of arsenic trioxide in cementitious materials. In: MisraVN, HalbeD, SpottiswoodDJ, editors. 6th AusIMM extractive metallurgy conference; Jul 3–6. Brisbane, Melbourne: Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy; p. 275–280.
8.
ChengH, HuY, LuoJ, XuB, ZhaoJ.2009. Geochemical processes controlling fate and transport of arsenic in acid mine drainage (AMD) and natural systems. J Haz Mat. 165(1-3):13–26.
9.
CoussyS, PaktuncD, RoseJ, BenzaazouaM.2012. Arsenic speciation in cemented paste backfills and synthetic calcium-silicate-hydrates. Miner Eng. 39(1):51–61.
10.
DrahotaP, FilippiM.2009. Secondary arsenic minerals in the environment: a review. Environ Int. 35(8):1243–1255.
11.
Fernández-JiménezA, PalomoA.2003. Characterisation of fly ashes. Potential reactivity as alkaline cements. Fuel. 82(18):2259–2265.
HemanaagG, PrasadBSRK.2014. Geo-polymer concrete using metakaolin, fly-ash and their comparison. Int J Eng Res Technol. 3(8):848–850.
14.
ICSC. 2005. Sodium arsenite. International Chemical Safety Card 1603. Geneva: International Organisation World and Health Organisation.
15.
ICSC. 2013. Arsenic pentoxide. International Chemical Safety Card 0377. Geneva: International Labour Organisation and World Health Organisation.
16.
LeistM, CaseyRJ, CaridiD.2003. The fixation and leaching of cement stabilized arsenic. Waste Manage. 23(4):353–359.
17.
LiY, MinX, KeY, FeiJ, LiuD, TangC.2019. Immobilization potential and immobilization mechanism of arsenic in cemented paste backfill. Miner Eng. 138:101–107.
18.
MacKenzieKJD, BrewDRM, FletcherRA, NicholsonCL, VaganaR, SchmückerM.2005. Towards an understanding of the synthesis mechanisms of geopolymer materials. In: DavidovitsJ, editor. Geopolymer, Green chemistry and sustainable development solutions, geopolymer 2005. Saint-Quentin, France: Institut Géopolymère, Saint-Quentin; p. 41–44.
19.
MatschullatJ.2000. Arsenic in the geosphere — a review. Sci Total Environ. 249(1-3):297–312.
20.
NazariAM, RadzinskiR, GhahremanA.2017. Review of arsenic metallurgy: treatment of arsenical minerals and the immobilization of arsenic. Hydrometallurgy. 174:258–281.
21.
PereraDS, HannaJV, DavisJ, BlackfordMG, LatellaBA, SasakiY, VanceER.2008. Relative strengths of phosphoric acid-reacted and alkali-reacted metakaolin materials. J Mater Sci. 43(19):6562–6566.
22.
QiC, FourieA.2019. Cemented paste backfill for mineral tailings management: review and future perspectives. Miner Eng. 144:106025.
23.
SadiqM.1997. Arsenic chemistry in soils: An overview of thermodynamic predictions and field observations. Water Air Soil Pollut. 93(1-4):117–136.
van ElterenJT, ŜlejkovecZ, ArčonI, GlassH-J.2006. An interdisciplinary physical-chemical approach for characterization of arsenic in a calciner residue dump in Cornwall (UK). Environ Pollut. 139(3):477–488.
26.
van JaarsveldJGS, van DeventerJSJ, SchwartzmanA.1999. The potential use of geopolymeric materials to immobilise toxic metals: Part II. Material and leaching characteristics. Miner Eng. 12(1):75–91.
27.
WangH, LiH, YanF.2005. Synthesis and mechanical properties of metakaolinite-based geopolymer. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 268:1–6.
28.
ZhangJ, ProvisJL, FengD, van DeventerJSJ.2008. Geopolymers for immobilization of Cr6+, Cd2+, Pb2+. J Haz Mat. 157(2-3):587–598.
29.
ZhangY, ZhangS, NiW, YanQ, GaoW, LiY.2019. Immobilisation of high-arsenic-containing tailings by using metallurgical slag-cementing materials. Chemosphere. 223:117–123.
