Life experiences and the formation of pro-ecological commitment: exploring the role of spirituality / Experiencias de vida y la formación del compromiso pro-ecológico: explorando el papel de la espiritualidad
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2018
Life experiences and the formation of pro-ecological commitment: exploring the role of spirituality / Experiencias de vida y la formación del compromiso pro-ecológico: explorando el papel de la espiritualidad
In order to understand what leads people to commit to both practices of environmental care and simple living, this work investigates how significant life experiences influence people who develop a pro-ecological commitment (PEC), focusing on experiences related to either religion or spirituality. Twenty-nine people socially perceived (and referred) as having PEC (17 males, aged between 23 and 79) participated in individual semi-structured interviews and described experiences that worked as a source of influence for their own commitment. In addition to what the literature proposes on the relation between spirituality and environmental care, the accounts highlighted the distinction made between religion and spirituality; the contact with nature mediated by religious practices; associations of the idea of the sacred (divine) with the environment; and the importance of these experiences as contexts of socialization and care for oneself and others.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbuquerqueM. B. B. (2012). Saberes da ayahuasca e processos educativos na religião do Santo Daime. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 10, 351–365.
2.
AmérigoM.AragonésJ. I.GarcíaJ. A. (2012). Explorando las dimensiones de la preocupación ambiental. Una propuesta integradora. Psyecology, 3, 299–311.
3.
BezerraR. F. (2009). Análise dos determinantes do compromisso ambiental de estudantes do Curso Técnico de Controle Ambiental, com base na percepção das fontes de influência autorrelatadas. Scientific initiation scholarship report, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal.
4.
BrandãoC. R. (2004). Fronteira da fé: Alguns sistemas de sentido, crenças e religiões no Brasil de hoje. Estudos Avançados, 18, 261–288.
5.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
6.
CarvalhoI. C. M.SteilC. A. (2008). A sacralização da natureza e a ‘naturalização’ do sagrado: Aportes teóricos para a compreensão dos entrecruzamentos entre saúde, ecologia e espiritualidade. Ambiente & Sociedade, 11, 289–305.
7.
ChawlaL. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 15–26.
8.
ClarkM. E. (1995). Changes in Euro-American values needed for sustainability. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 63–82.
9.
CsutoraM.ZsókaA. (2012). Relation of spirituality to happiness, life satisfaction and sustainable lifestyles. Annals of the International Conference on Spirituality and Sustainability: A New Path for Entrepreneurship, Visegrád, Hungria.
10.
DietzT.SternP. C.GuagnanoG. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450–471.
11.
DinizR. F. (2010). Cuidado ambiental em tempos de sustentabilidade: explorando dimensões da conduta sustentável com estudantes universitários. Masters dissertation (unpublished), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal.
12.
FarrellJ. (2013). Environmental activism and moral schemas: Cultural components of differential participation. Environment and Behavior, 45, 399–423.
13.
FuscoE.SniderA.LuoS. (2012). Perception of global climate change as a mediator of the effects of major and religious affiliation on college students’ environmentally responsible behavior. Environmental Education Research, 18, 815–830.
14.
Gaspar de CarvalhoR.Palma-OliveiraM.Corral-VerdugoV. (2010). Why do people fail to act? Situational barriers and constraints on ecological behavior. In Corral-VerdugoV.García-CadenaC.Frías-ArmentaM. (Orgs.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in research, theory and practice (pp. 269–294). Nova York, NY: Nova Science.
15.
GurgelF. F.PinheiroJ. Q. (2011). Compromisso pró-ecológico. In CavalcanteS.ElaliG. A. (Eds.), Temas básicos em psicologia ambiental (pp. 159–173). Petrópolis: Vozes.
16.
HillD.FigueiredoA. J.JacobsJ. (2010). Contextual influences on sustainable behavior. In Corral-VerdugoV.García-CadenaC.Frías-ArmentaM. (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in research, theory and practice (pp. 247–268). New York, NY: Nova Science.
17.
HsuS.-J. (2009). Significant life experiences affect environmental action: A confirmation study in eastern Taiwan. Environmental Education Research, 15, 497–517.
18.
KanagyC. L.WillitsF. K. (1993). A “greening” of religion? Some evidence from a Pennsylvania sample. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 674–683.
19.
ManolasE.HockeyJ.LittledykeM. (2013). A natural history of an environmentalist: Identifying influences on pro-sustainability behavior through biography and autoethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14, s.p.
20.
MikaM. (2006). Framing the issue: Religion, secular ethics and the case of animal rights mobilization. Social Forces, 85, 915–941.
21.
MoraisD. (2013). De onde vem a pró-ambientalidade? Atribuição de fontes de determinação do compromisso pró-ecológico. Scientific initiation scholarship report, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal.
22.
Moyano-DíazE.CornejoF. A.GallardoI. (2011). Creencias y conductas ambientales, liberalismo económico y felicidad. Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 14, 69–77.
23.
MuiñosG.SuárezE.HessS.HernándezB. (2015). Frugality and psychological wellbeing. The role of voluntary restriction and the resourceful use of resources. Psyecology, 6, 169–190.
24.
PaivaG. J. (2005). Espiritualidade na Psicologia e Psicologia na Espiritualidade. Magis Cadernos de Fé e Cultura, 47, 9–20.
25.
PalmerJ. A.SuggateJ.BajdB.HoR. K.Ofwono‐OrechoJ. K. W.PeriesM.StadenC. V. (1998). An overview of significant influences and formative experiences on the development of adults’ environmental awareness in nine countries. Environmental Education Research, 4, 445–464.
26.
PargamentK. I.MahoneyA. (2005). THEORY: “ Sacred matters: Sanctification as a vital topic for the psychology of religion“. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 179–198.
27.
PinheiroJ. Q. (1997). Psicologia Ambiental: A busca de um ambiente melhor. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 2, 377–398.
28.
PinheiroJ. Q.DinizR. (2013). Autoavaliação e percepção social do compromisso pró-ecológico: Medidas psicológicas e de senso comum. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicologia, 45, 413–422.
29.
SaroglouV. (2003). Spiritualité moderne. Un regard de psychologie de la religion. Revue théologique de Louvain, 34, 473–504.
30.
SchultzP. W.ZeleznyL.DalrympleN. J. (2000). A multinational perspective on the relation between Judeo-Christian religious beliefs and attitudes of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 32, 576–591.
31.
SiliprandiE. (2000). Ecofeminismo: Contribuições e limites para a abordagem de políticas ambientais. Agroecologia e Desenvolvimento Rural Sustentável, 1, 61–71.
32.
SilvaJ. P. (2009). Práticas religiosas e consciência ecológica nas religiões afro-pessoenses. CAOS - Revista Eletrônica de Ciências Sociais, 14, 174–190.
33.
SilvaM. G. (2010). Questão ambiental e desenvolvimento sustentável: Um desafio ético-político ao serviço social. São Paulo: Cortez.
34.
SiqueiraD. (2008). O labirinto religioso ocidental, da religião à espiritualidade, do institucional ao não convencional. Sociedade e Estado, 23, 425–462.
35.
SousaA. F. (2008). Percepção social do compromisso ambiental de adolescentes e sua relação com outros indicadores de pró-ambientalidade. Relatório final de bolsista de iniciação científica apresentado à Pró-reitoria de Pesquisa da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal.
36.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.
37.
TannerT. (1980). Significant life experiences: A new research area in environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 11, 20–24.
38.
TarakeshwarN.SwankA. B.PargamentK. I.MahoneyA. (2001). The sanctification of nature and theological conservatism: A study of opposing religious correlates of environmentalism. Review of Religious Research, 42, 387–404.
39.
UzzellD. (2009). Comentarios críticos para tiempos críticos: Cuestionando la contribuición de la psicología a una sociedad sostenible. In García MiraR. A.Vega MarcoteP. (Eds.), Sostenibilidad, valores y cultura ambiental (pp. 147–164). Madrid: Piramide.
40.
VergoteA. (1997). Religion, belief and unbelief. A psychological study. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
41.
WellsN. M.LekiesK. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
42.
WhiteE.UzzelD.RäthzelN.GaterslebenB. (2010). Using life histories in psychology: A methodological guide (RESOLVE Working Paper Series, 01-10). Guildford: University of Surrey.
43.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I. (2005). Religiousness and spirituality. In PaloutzianR. F.ParkC. L. (Eds.), The handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 21–42). New York, NY: Guilford.
44.
ZinnbauerB. J.PargamentK. I.ScottA. B. (1999). The emerging meanings of religiousness and spirituality: Problems and prospects. Journal of Personality, 67, 889–919.
