Calculative and relational trust in the management of coastal floods and earthquakes: a comparative study ( Confianza calculativa y relacional en la gestión de inundaciones costeras y terremotos: un estudio comparativo )

Abstract

Spanish

Local communities have perfected their knowledge about their environments for generations. Considering modern management dynamics and the changing characteristics of their immediate environments, local communities must trust the authorities’ management of these risks. However, different types of risks expose these communities. This article proposes a comparative analysis of local trust dynamics between a locality in the French coast exposed to flood risks, and a town in inner Italy exposed to earthquake risks. The study focuses on how participants express calculative or relational trust through interviews. Results show that French participants consider the local risks of coastal floods to be minimal. In this sense they trust local authorities with the ability to manage these situations, even if generalized concerns over relational trust are also expressed. In Italy local inhabitants express a high awareness of earthquake risks. But the lack of preventive action from local authorities is associated with the expression of low calculative and relational trust.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beck

(1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: SAGE.

Castro

Ali Uzelgun

Bertoldo

(2016). Climate change activism between weak and strong environmentalism: Advocating social change with moderate argumentation strategies. In Howarth

Andreouli

(Eds.), The Social Psychology of Everyday politics (pp. 170–188). London: Routledge.

Castro

Mouro

(2011). Psycho-social processes in dealing with legal innovation in the community: Insights from biodiversity conservation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47, 362–373.

Earle

T. C.

(2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541–574.

Elcheroth

Doise

Reicher

(2011). On the knowledge of politics and the politics of knowledge: How a social representations approach helps us rethink the subject of political psychology. Political Psychology, 32, 729–758.

Engdahl

Lidskog

(2014). Risk, communication and trust: Towards an emotional understanding of trust. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 703–717.

Fiske

S. T.

Cuddy

A. J. C.

Glick

(2002). A model of (Often Mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.

Green

(2008). Unauthorised development and seismic hazard vulnerability: A study of squatters and engineers in Istanbul, Turkey. Disasters, 32, 358–376.

Joffe

Rossetto

Solberg

O’Connor

(2013). Social representations of earthquakes : A study of people living in three highly seismic areas. Earthquake Spectra, 29, 367–397.

10.

Joffe

Staerklé

(2007). The centrality of the self-control ethos in Western aspersions regarding outgroups: A social representational approach to stereotype content. Culture & Psychology, 13, 395–418.

11.

Krien

Michel-Guillou

(2014). Place des risques côtiers dans les représentations sociales du cadre de vie d’habitants de communes littorales. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 101, 101–122.

12.

Lemée

Fleury-Bahi

Krien

Deledalle

Mercier

Coquet

Navarro

(2018). Factorial structure of the coastal flooding risk perception and validation of a French coastal flooding risk evaluation scale (CFRES) for non-experts. Ocean and Coastal Management, 155, 68–75.

13.

Luhmann

(1979). Trust and power: Two works. Chichester: John Wiley.

14.

Moscovici

(2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

15.

Mouro

Castro

(2016). Self–other relations in biodiversity conservation in the community: Representational processes and adjustment to new actions. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26, 340–353.

16.

Nazarea

V. D.

(2006). Local knowledge and memory in biodiversity conservation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 317–335.

17.

Poumadère

Bertoldo

Idier

Mallet

Oliveros

Robin

(2015). Coastal vulnerabilities under the deliberation of stakeholders: The case of two French sandy beaches. Ocean and Coastal Management, 105, 166–176.

18.

Rousseau

D. M.

Sitkin

S. B.

Burt

R. S.

Camerer

(1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.

19.

Solberg

Rossetto

Joffe

(2010). The social psychology of seismic hazard adjustment: Re-evaluating the international literature. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 10, 1663–1677.

20.

Vanderlinden

A. J.

Baztan

Touili

Kane

I. O.

Vanderlinden

Baztan

Zagonaritt

(2017). Coastal flooding, uncertainty and climate change: Science as a solution to (mis) perceptions? A qualitative enquiry in three coastal european settings. Journal of Coastal Research, 77, 127–133.

21.

Wynne

(1992). Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement. In Krimsky

Golding

(Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 275–297). Westport, CT: Praeger.