According to Affective Events Theory, the emotional elicitation process is initiated by the appraisal of affective events happening to employees. Moreover, the theory states that these elicited affective experiences influence attitude and behaviour in the workplace. In the present study this theoretical frame is applied to explain the interplay of variables influencing state work engagement. We analyse the mediating role of affect between work events’ appraisals and daily work engagement, using a diary study. One hundred and seventeen workers answered a daily questionnaire for at least 10 days generating a total of 1,203 registers. Multilevel analysis proved that daily events’ appraisal is positively related to state work engagement, and that this relationship is partially mediated by positive and negative affect. Moreover, the effect of positive affect was bigger than the one of negative affect. The explored relations provide new theoretical elements for models that explain which variables influence state work engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13, 209–223. doi:10.1108/13620430810870476
2.
BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.). (2010). Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
3.
BakkerA. B.XanthopoulouD. (2009). The crossover of daily work engagement: Test of an actor-partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1562–1571. doi:10.1037/a0017525
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
5.
BarsadeS. G.GibsonD. E. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations?Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 36–59. doi:10.5465/AMP.2007.24286163
6.
BledowR.SchmittA.FreseM.KühnelJ. (2011). The affective shift model of work engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1246–1257. doi:10.1037/a0024532
7.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145030
8.
CarverC. S.SuttonS. K.ScheierM. F. (2000). Action, emotion, and personality: Emerging conceptual integration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 741–751. doi:10.1177/0146167200268008
9.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
10.
FredricksonB. L.TugadeM. M.WaughC. E.LarkinG. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the united states on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365–376. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.365
11.
IliesR.SchwindM.HellerD. (2007). Employee well-being: A multilevel model linking work and non-work domains. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 16, 326–341. doi:10.1080/13594320701363712
12.
KrullJ. L.MacKinnonD. P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249–277. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06
13.
LazarusR. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1–22. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.000245
14.
LeiterM. P.BakkerA. B. (2010). Work engagement: Introduction. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15.
LyubomirskyS.KingL.DienerE. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
16.
NezlekJ. B.VansteelandtK.MechelenI. V.KuppensP. (2008). Appraisal-emotion relationship in daily life. Emotion, 8, 145–150. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.8.1.145
17.
OhlyS.SonnentagS.NiessenC.ZapfD. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000009
18.
OuweneelE.Le BlancP.SchaufeliW. B.van WijheC. I. (2012). Good morning, good day: A diary study on positive emotions, hope and work engagement. Human Relations, 65, 1129–1154. doi:10.1177/0018726711429382
19.
PreacherK.HayesA. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879
20.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. doi:10.1037/a0020141
21.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714
22.
SalanovaM.LlorensS.SchaufeliW. B. (2011). Yes I can, I feel good, and I just do it! On gain cycles and spirals of efficacy beliefs affect, and engagement. Applied psychology: An International Review, 60, 255–285. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00435.x
23.
SchaufeliW. B.SalanovaM.González-RomáV.BakkerA. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A confirmative analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92. doi:10.1023/a:1015630930326
24.
SeppälaP.SchaufeliW. B. (2009). The construct validity of the Utrecht work engagement scale: Multisample and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 459–481. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y
25.
SonnentagS.DormannC.DemeroutiE. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 25–38). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
26.
SonnentagS.IliesR. (2011). Intra-individual processes linking work and employee well-being: Introduction into the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 521–525. doi:10.1002/job.757
27.
SweetmanD.LuthansF. (2010). The power of positive psychology: Psychological capital and work engagement. In BakkerA. B.LeiterM. P. (Eds.), Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research (pp. 64–68). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
WarrP. B. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193–210. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00521.x
29.
WarrP. B.ClappertonG. (2010). The joy of work?: Jobs, happiness, and you. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
30.
WarrP. B.ParkerS. (2010). IWP multi-affect indicator (unpublished). Sheffield: Institute of Work Psychology, University of Sheffield.
31.
WeissH. M.BealD. J. (2005). Reflections on affective events theory. In AshkanasyN. M.ZerbeW. J.HärtelC. E. J. (Eds.), Research on emotions in organizations (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
32.
WeissH. M.CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 1–74.
33.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA.HeuvenE.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2008). Working in the sky: A diary study on work engagement among flight attendants. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13, 345–356. doi:10.1037//1076-8998.13.4.345
34.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B. (2013). The significance of within-person fluctuations. In BakkerA. B.DanielsK. (Eds.), A day in the life of a happy worker (pp. 25–40). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
35.
XanthopoulouD.BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE.SchaufeliW. B. (2009). Work engagement and financial returns: A diary study on the role of job and personal resources. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 183–200. doi:10.1348/096317908X285633
