Neither Scientific nor Democratic

Cited in Socarides C.W. , “Sexual Politics and Scientific Logic: The Issue of Homosexuality,” The Journal of Psychohistory 10, no. 3 (1992), p. 308.

Cited in Socarides C.W. , “Sexual Politics and Scientific Logic: The Issue of Homosexuality,” The Journal of Psychohistory 10, no. 3 (1992), p. 308.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), p. 102.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 102–3.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), p. 104.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 104–5.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 105–6.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), p. 145.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), p. 146.

Bayer R. , Homosexuality and American Psychiatry: The Politics of Diagnosis (New York: Basic Books, 1981), pp. 3–4.

As reported by Cornett C. , “Gay Ain't Broke; No need to Fix It,” Insight, 4 December 1993, p. 27.

Burr C. , “Homosexuality and Biology,” Atlantic Monthly 271, no. 3 (March 1993), pp. 47–65.

Pollard E. , “Time to Give Up Fascist Tactics,” Washington Blade, 31 January 1992, p. 39.

Horgan J. , “Eugenics Revisited,” Scientific American, June 1993, pp. 123–31.

Paul Billings's precise comments are cited in the discussion of genetics research that follows.

Quoted in Bailey J.M. , “Heritable factors Influence Sexual Orientations in Women,” Archives of General Psychiatry 50, no. 3, pp. 217–23.

See Harrington G.M. , “Psychology of the Scientist: XXVII. Experimental Bias: Occam's Razor versus Pascal's Wager,” Psychological Reports 21, no. I (1967), pp. 527–28; G.M. Harrington and L.H. Ingraham, “Psychology of the Scientist: XXV. Experimenter Bias and Tails of Pascal,” Psychological Reports 21, no. 2 (1967), pp. 513–16; J.G. Adair and J.S. Epstein, “Verbal Cues in the Mediation of Experimenter Bias,” Psychological Reports 22, no. 3 (1968), pp. 1045–52, J.B. Dusek, “Experimenter-bias Effects on the Simple Motor Task Performance of Low- and High-test Anxious Boys and Girls, ” Psychological Reports 30, no. 3, (1972), pp. 107–14; P.J. Barber and J.P. Rushton, “Experimenter Bias and Subliminal Perception,” British Journal of Pyschology 66, no.3 (1975), pp. 357–62, R. Rikli, “Physical Performance Scores as a Function of Experimenter Sex and Experimenter Bias,” Research Quarterly 47, no. 4 (1976), pp. 776–82; D. Jamieson and W.M. Petrusic, “On a Bias Induced by the Provision of Feedback in Psychophysical Experiments,” Acta Psychologia (Amsterdam) 40, no. 3 (1971), pp. 199–206; D. Belton and R. Ware, “Effect of Instruction on the Disappearance of Steadily Fixated Luminous Figures,” Journal of General Psychology (1981), pp. 249–56, second half; R. Rogers, et al., “Scientific Inquiry Forensic Psychiatry,” International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 5, no. 2 (1982), pp. 187–203; F.M. Levine and L.L. De Simone, “The Effects of Experimenter Gender on Pain Report in Male and Female Subjects,” Pain 44, no. 1 (1991), pp. 69–72.

Socarides, “Sexual Politics and Scientific Logic,” pp. 316–17.