Oral Contraceptives, in Drug Facts and Comparisons, Facts and Comparisions, St. Louis, MO, 1993, pp 377-381.
5.
MuradF, HaynesRC: Estrogens and Progestins, in GilmanAG, GoodmanLS, RallTW, MuradF, (eds): Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics.New York, Macmillan, 1985, pp 1412–1439.
6.
SperoffL: The formulation of oral contraceptives: does the amount of estrogen make any clinical difference?Johns Hopkins Medical Journal1982; 150: 1970–1976.
7.
The most recent innovation in birth control. NORPLANT SYSTEM informational booklet. Wyeth, December 10, 1990.
8.
Seley v. GD Searle and Co., Nos. 80-336, 80-360, Supreme Court of Ohio, July 15, 1981.
9.
TurnerR: Hormonal implants prove to be highly acceptable, although nearly all users experience side effects. Family Planning Perspectives1990; 22(5): 234–235.
10.
SmithS: Physicians prepare for arrival of revolutionary birth control. The Miami Herald (Broward Local), 3/9/91.
11.
RosenbaumC: Norplant not for everyone: some women feel side effects. The Washington Times, 12/6/92, p A9.
12.
Singleton-YatawaraG, ArcherDF: Use of ethinyl estradiol (EE) to stop the prolonged bleeding associated with Norplant. Abstract 0-115 from the 1992 meeting of the American Fertility Society.
13.
MechcatieE: Estradiol found to stem Norplant-related bleeding in small study. Ob Gyn News 1/1/93, p 23.
14.
Norplant may be good choice for teens, Ob Gyn News, 1/1/92, p. 2.
15.
CorxattoHB, DiazS, PavezM, MirandaP, BrandeisA: Plasma progesterone levels during long-term treatment with levonorgestrel silastic implants, Acta Endocrinologica1982; 101: 307–311.
16.
BracheV, FaundesA, JohanssonE, AlvarezF: Anovulation, inadequate luteal phase and poor sperm penetration in cervical mucus during prolonged use of Norplant implants. Contraception1985; 31(3): 261–273.
17.
BracheV, Alvarez-SanchezF, FaundesA, TejadaAS, CochonL: Ovarian endocrine function through five years of continuous treatment with Norplant subdermal contraceptive implants. Contraception1990; 41(2): 169–177.
18.
ShaabanMM, SegalS, SalemHT, GhaneimahSA, KhalifaE-AM, AhmedA-G: Sonographic assessment of ovarian and endometrial changes during long-term Norplant use and their correlation with hormonal levels. Fertility and Sterility1993; 59(5): 998–1002.
19.
CroxattoHB, DiazS, SalvatierraAM, MoralesP, EbenspergerC, BrandeisA: Treatment with Norplant subdermal implants inhibits sperm penetration through cervical mucus in vitro. Contraception1987; 36(2): 193–201.
20.
CroxattoHD, DiazS, PavezM, CroxattoHB: Histopathology of the Endometrium During Continuous Use of Levonorgestrel, in ZatuchniGL, GoldsmithA, SheltonJD, SciarraJJ, (eds): Long acting contraceptive delivery systems.Philadelphia, Harper and Row, 1984, pp 290–295.
21.
SegalSJ, Alvarez-SanchezF, BracheV, FaundesA, ViljaP, TuohimaaP: Norplant implants: the mechanism of contraceptive action. Fertilization and Sterility1991; 56: 273–277.
22.
LittIF: Adolecent medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association1991; 265(23): 3100–3101.
23.
Norplant considered good option for many teens. Ob Gyn News 6/1/92, p 24.
24.
Clinics policy on implant. The Washington Post 4/5/91.
25.
School clinics in Baltimore to offer Norplant. Dayton Daily News (New York Times News Service) 12/4/92.
26.
HansonG: Norplant joins war on teen pregnancy. Insight 3/8/93; 9(10): 6–11, 34-35.
27.
ValentinePW: Baltimore eyes study of Norplant. The Washington Post 1/26/93.
28.
NeuhausRJ: The wrong way to go. National Review 2/1/93, p 53.
29.
Even with Norplant, protecting teens not easy. Dayton Daily News 12/14/92.
30.
Baltimore's lead in contraception. New York Times 12/14/92.
31.
BrownSJ: Baltimore schools to assess Norplant's impact on teen sexual behavior. Ob Gyn News 3/1/93, p 2.
32.
Highest rate of gonorrhea infection in teen girls; increasing in children. Dayton Daily News (Associated Press) 8/20/93.
33.
SquiresS: The price of Norplant. Washington Post Health 11/16/93, p 9.
34.
StuckeyT: Free-birth-control plan is unexpected hit. The Washington Times (Metro) 12/15/93.
35.
Funds offered for poor to obtain birth control. The Washington Times 4/26/91, p A2.
36.
The Norplant Foundation, P.O. Box 25223, Alexandria, VA 22314-25223. Phone: (703) 706-5933.
37.
BoothW: Judge orders birth control implant in defendant. The Washington Post 1/5/91, p A1.
38.
McEnroeP: Birth control sentence stirs ire. Rocky Mountain News 7/16/91, p 4.
39.
Judge removes himself in birth control case. New york Times 4/15/91, p A13.
40.
LewinT: Implanted birth control device renews debate over forced contraception. New York Times (National) 1/10/91, p A13.
41.
LevM: Judge is firm on forced contraception, but welcomes an appeal. New York Times (National) 1/11/91, p A17.
42.
GardnerM: Birth control by law. Christian Science Monitor 1/15/91, p 15.
43.
MacKenzieJP: Whose choice is it anyway?New York Times 1/28/91, p A22.
44.
FeinB: This birth-control sentence is correct. USA Today, 2/4/91, p 8A.
45.
PineRN: Don't force birth control on women. USA Today, 2/4/91, p 8A.
46.
AllenC: Norplant-birth control of coercion?Wall Street Journal 9/13/91, p A10.
47.
KeverJ, and VillafrancaA: Judge orders mom to get birth control. San Antonio Light 10/3/91.
48.
SchwartzM: Duke presses Louisana birth control. The Washington Post 5/29/91, p A14.
49.
ThiesCF: Thinking about Norplant. The Free Market9(11): November, 1991. Ludwig von Mises Institute, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5301.
50.
RichardsonV: California to give welfare women the latest hormone contraceptive. The Washington Times 2/22/92. p 1.
51.
Panel ok's scholarships for birth control. The Washington Times 4/17/92, p. A2.
52.
SzczepanowskiR: Maryland governor addresses lawmakers: Schaefer's Norplant suggestion criticized. Catholic Standard 1/21/93, p 5.
53.
MechatieE: Norplant generating controversy in Md.: gov. suggests forced use in welfare moms. Ob Gyn News 3/1/93, p 2.
54.
Ohio 119th General Assembly, House Bill 819, 1991-1992.
55.
Board of Trustees, American Medical Association: Requirements or incentives by government for the use of long-acting contraceptives. Journal of the American Medical Association1992; 267(13): 1818–1821.
56.
Gomes dos ReisAR: Norplant in Brazil: implantation strategy in the guise of scientific research. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering1990; 3(2): 111–118.
57.
Ubinig: Research report Norplant, the five year needle: an investigation of the Norplant trial in Bangladesh from the user's perspective. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering1990; 3(3): 211–228.
58.
HopkinsE: Fertility police. Mirabella June, 1991, p 103–106.
59.
Ubinig: ‘The price of Norplant is TK 2000! You cannot remove it.’ Clients are refused removal in Norplant trial in Bangladesh. Issues in Reproductive and Genetic Engineering1991; 4(1): 45–46.
60.
ToddD: Walking time bombs: birth control implant can lead to sudden death. The Toronto Star 12/28/91, p H10.
61.
BaconKH: U.S. birth control r&d lags. Wall Street Journal 2/13/90.
62.
Jane Doe, Annrita Garcia, Mary Roe, and Leticia Walker v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories. No. 93 L 11096 (Filed 11/5/93). Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.
63.
Dalkon Shield fund set at $2.5 billion. Dayton Daily News (Associated Press) 12/12/87.
64.
IUD-claims fund clears way for merger. Dayton Daily News (Associated Press) 3/17/88.
65.
IUD manufacturer G.D. Searle and Co. found negligent. The Wanderer, 9/29/88.
66.
Costly lawsuit. American Druggist (Teleflashes) October, 1988.
67.
BoodmanSG: $4.75 billion proposed for breast-implant cases. Washington Post Health, 9/21/93, p 7.
68.
TwicklerDM, SchwarzBE: Imaging of the levonorgestrel implantable contraceptive device. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology1992; 167(2): 572–573.
69.
MechcatieE: Norplant capsules can be difficult to remove; otherproblems cited. Ob Gyn New 5/1/93, p 2and Mechcatie E: Problems cropping up in Norplant users. Family Practice News 5/1/93.