Assessing intrinsic wood qualities such as modulus of elasticity and internal decay in trees and logs can be challenging. However, acoustic technologies have been investigated for a possible solution. This paper reviews available literature on non-destructive acoustic methods for assessing wood quality, both in tree and log form. The paper further reviews the effects of silvicultural practices (such as thinning and pruning) on wood quality assessed by non-destructive acoustic methods. We documented some of the benefits of application of non-destructive acoustic methods on wood quality of trees and logs. The acoustic velocity of a tree (VT) or log (VL) of the propagated waves and wood density can be used to determine the Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity (MOEd). Thinning was reported to affect VT/VL and MOEd negatively. Acoustic tomography methods were equally found to have good accuracy in detecting the location and extent of wood decay in standing trees and logs.
AcunaMA, MurphyGE.2006. Use of near infrared spectroscopy and multivariate analysis to predict wood density of Douglas-Fir from chain saw chips. For Prod J. 56(11):1–10.
2.
AddisT, BuchananA, WalkerJCF.1997. Log segregation into stiffness classes. Report, Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, New Zealand. p. 7–11.
3.
AlbertDJ, ClarkTA, DicksonRL, WalkerJC.2002. Using acoustics to sort Radiata pine pulp logs according to fibre characteristics and paper properties. Int For Rev. 4(1):12–19.
4.
AmishevDY.2008. In-forest log segregation based on acoustic measurement of wood stiffness. Phd Thesis, Department of Forest Engineering Oregon State University, Corvallis; p. 272.
5.
AmishevD, GlenE.2008. Implementing resonance-based acoustic technology on mechanical harvesters/processors for real-time wood stiffness assessment: opportunities and considerations. Int J For Eng. 19(2):48–56. doi:10.1080/14942119.2008.10702567.
6.
AndrewsM.2000. ‘Where are we with Sonics?’ Workshop 2000. Capturing the benefits of forestry research: putting ideas to work. Wood Technology Research Centre. Christ Church: University of Canterbury; p. 57–61.
7.
AndrewsMK.2002a. Which acoustic speed? In 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. p. 159–165. Berkeley (CA).
8.
AndrewsM.2002b. Wood quality measurement – Son et Lumière. N Z J For. 47(1):19–21.
9.
AratakeS, ArimaT.1994. Estimation of modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of lumber using higher natural frequency of log in Pile of Logs II- possibility of application for Sugi Square Lumber with Pith. MokuzaiG Akkaishi. 40(9):1003–1007.
10.
AratakeS, ArimaT, SakodaT, NakamuraY.1992. Estimation of modulus of rupture (MOR) and modulus of elasticity (MOE) of lumber using higher natural frequency of log in pile of logs – possibility of application for Sugi Scaffolding Board. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 38(11):995–1001.
11.
ArimaT, MaruymuraM, MaruyamaS, HayamuraS.1990. Natural frequency of log and lumber hit with hammer and applications for production processing. In Proceedings of the 1990 International Timber Engineering Conference. p. 527–533. Tokyo, Japan.
12.
AxmonJ.2000. On detection of decay in growing Norway Spruce via natural frequencies. Licentiate thesis. Department of Applied Electronics. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund, Sweden. p. 105.
13.
BaasP.2014. Wood variation – its causes and control B. J. Zobel and J.P. van Buijtenen, Xv + 363 Pp., Illus., 1989. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, London, Paris, Tokyo. Price: DM 278.00 (Hardback). IAWA J 10 (4). doi:10.1163/22941932-90001136.
14.
BellER, PeckEC, KruegerNT.1954. Modulus of elasticity of wood determined by dynamic methods, Reports. United States Departments of Agriculture and Forest Services Forest Product Laboratory. Article No. 1977.
15.
BertoldoC.2014. Propriedades de Resistência e de Rigidez Da of, Obtidas a Partir Da Avaliação Acústica Na Árvore [Predicting Trees]. Strength and Stiffness of Wood Using Acoustic Measurement in Universidade. Phd Thesis. Faculdade de Engenharia Agrícola. Estadual de Campinas, SP, Brazil. p. 146.
16.
BethgeK, MattheckC, HungerE.1996. Equipment for detection and evaluation of incipient decay in trees. Arboric J. 20(1). doi:10.1080/03071375.1996.9747095.
17.
BookerR.1997. Stiffness testing of standing trees. In: Ridoutt B, editor. Proceedings 2nd New Zealand Wood Quality Workshop. New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd, FRI Bulletin. New Zealand: Forest Research Institute, New Zealand Forest Service, Rotorua; p. 5–6.
18.
BoyceJS.1948. Forest pathology, 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw–Hill Book.
19.
BrashawB, BucurV, DivosF, GonçalvesR, LuJ, MederR, PellerinR.2009. Nondestructive testing and evaluation of wood: a worldwide research update. For Prod J. 59(3):7–14.
20.
BrashawBK, RossJR, PellerinRF.1996. Stress-wave nondestructive evaluation of green Veneer: Southern Yellow Pine and Douglasfir. In Nondestruct Eval Mater Compos. doi:10.1117/12.259070.
21.
BrazeeNJ, RobertEM, LotharG, PhillipVW.2011. Non-destructive assessment of internal decay in three Hardwood species of Northeastern North America using Sonic and Electrical Impedance Tomography. Forestry. 84(1): doi:10.1093/forestry/cpq040.
22.
BriggsDG, GonzaloT, TurnblomEC, EiniL, DennisD, RossRJ, WangX, CarterP.2007. Influence of thinning on acoustic velocity of Douglas-Fir trees in Western Washington and Western Oregon. 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. 113–127.
23.
BucurV.2003. Techniques for high resolution imaging of wood structure: a review. Meas Sci Technol. 14(12). doi:10.1088/0957-0233/14/12/R01.
24.
BucurV.2005. Ultrasonic techniques for nondestructive testing of standing trees. Ultrasonics. 43(4):237–239. doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2004.06.008.
25.
BucurV.2010. The hygroscopic warping of cross-laminated timber. In: BucurV, editor. Delamination in wood, wood products and wood-based composites. Dordrecht: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9550-3_14.
26.
ButlerMA, DahlenJ, EberhardtTL, MontesC, AntonyF, DanielsRF.2017. Acoustic evaluation of Loblolly Pine Tree- and Lumber-Length Logs allows for segregation of lumber modulus of elasticity, not for modulus of rupture. Ann For Sci. 74(1):1–15. doi:10.1007/s13595-016-0615-9.
27.
CalegariL, GattoDA, StangerlinDM.2011. Influence of moisture content, specific gravity and specimen geometry on the ultrasonic pulse velocity in Eucalyptus Grandis Hill Ex Maiden Wood. Revista Ciência Da Madeira - RCM. 2:2. doi:10.12953/2177-6830.v02n02a01.
28.
CarsonSD, CownDJ, McKinleyRB, MooreJR.2014. Effects of site, silviculture and seedlot on wood density and estimated wood stiffness in Radiata Pine at mid-rotation. N Z J For Sci. 44(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s40490-014-0026-3.
29.
CarterP, BriggsD, RossRJ, WangX.2005a. Acoustic testing to enhance western forest values and meet customer wood quality needs. USDA Forest Service – General Technical Report PNW.
30.
CarterP, WangX, RossRJ, BriggsD.2005b. NDE of logs and standing trees using new acoustic tools – technical application and result. In Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, edited by Germany. University of Applied Sciences, Eberswalde. p. 161–169. Aachen, Germany: Shaker Verlag.
31.
CasadoM, AcuñaL, BasterraLA, HerederoS, SanMartínR.2013. Estimación de La Calidad de La Madera En Rollo de Populus x Euramericana Mediante Ultrasonidos [Estimation of Round Timber Quality of Populus x Euramericana by Ultrasounds]. In Proceedings of 6° Congreso Forestal Español, 11. Vitoria, Spain.
32.
ChauhanS, AnilS.2016. Differences in dynamic modulus of elasticity determined by three vibration methods and their relationship with static modulus of elasticity. Maderas: Ciencia y Tecnologia. 18(2):373–382. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2016005000034.
33.
ChauhanSS, WalkerJCF.2006. Variations in acoustic velocity and density with age, and their interrelationships in Radiata Pine. For Ecol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.019.
34.
ChengJL, ChiuCM, WangSY.2000. Application of ultrasound in detecting wood decay in squirrel-damaged standing trees of Luanta China Fir. Taiwan J For Sci. 15(2):267–79. https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.200006.0267.
35.
ChengJL, KaoYC, LinTT, TsaiMJ, WangYS, LinLD, WangYN, ChanMH.2008. Application of an Ultrasonic Tomographic Technique for detecting defects in standing trees. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation62(4): 267-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2007.09.007.
36.
ChiuCM, LinCH, YangTH.2013. Application of nondestructive methods to evaluate mechanical properties of 32-year-old Taiwan Incense Cedar (Calocedrus Formosana) wood. BioResources. doi:10.15376/biores.8.1.688-700.
37.
ChruscielL, NanayL.2004. Nondestructive characterization and imaging of wood. NDT E Int. 37(3):249. doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.09.008.
38.
ChuangST, WangSY.2001. Evaluation of standing tree quality of Japanese Cedar grown with different spacing using stress-wave and ultrasonic-wave methods. J Wood Sci. 47(4): doi:10.1007/BF00766709.
39.
ColinMA, DicksonRL, SpencerDJ, JoeB, IlicJ.2002. Acoustic segregation of Pinus Radiata Logs according to stiffness. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1051/forest:2002031.
40.
CownD.2006. Wood quality in standing timber – evolution of assessment methods in plantations. 5th IUFRO Symposium – Wood Structure and Properties’ 06. S. Kurjatko, J. Kúdela & R. Lagaňa. Arbora Publishers, Zvolen, Slovakia, editors. p. 11–17. ISBN 80–968869–4–3.
41.
DeflorioG, FinkS, SchwarzeFW.2008. Detection of incipient decay in tree stems with sonic tomography after wounding and fungal inoculation. Wood Sci Technol. 42(2). doi:10.1007/s00226-007-0159-0.
42.
DevosF, SzalaiL.2002. Tree evaluation by acoustic tomography. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on nondestructive testing of wood, edited by DG Pollock. Berkeley (CA): Forest Products Society; p. 251–256.
43.
DicksonRL, JoeB, JohnstonD, NotarasS, NotarasB, AustinS, Ribton-TurnerF, HarriSP.2004a. Pre-processing prediction of wood quality in Peeler Logs and Saw Logs. In Proceedings of the Wood Quality Conference. Albury, NSW, Australia.
44.
DicksonRL, JoeB, HarrisP, HoltorfS, WilkinsonC.2004b. Acoustic segregation of Australian-grown Pinus Radiata Logs for structural board production. Aust For. 67(4). doi:10.1080/00049158.2004.10674944.
45.
DivosF, SzalaiL.2002. Tree evaluation by acoustic tomography. In Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. p. 251–256. Berkeley (CA).
46.
DolwinJA, LonsdaleD, BarnettJ.1998. Detection of decay in trees. Commonw For Rev. 77(4):277–280.
47.
EmmsGW, NanayakkaraB, HarringtonJJ.2013. Application of longitudinal-wave time-of-flight sound speed measurement to Pinus Radiata seedlings. Can J For Res. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2012-0482.
48.
FahertyKF, WilliamsonTG.1998. Wood engineering and construction handbook, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; p. 952.
49.
FlammarionJP, KellerR, MosnierJC.1990. Production Économique de Bois de Qualité Par l’élagage Des Plantations de Resineux. In: Proc 3rd Conf Science et Industrie Du Bois, Bordeaux. p. 437−446. Tome 2.
50.
GaoL, LiuJ, XueH.2010. Nondestructive detection of standing trees and Radar Wave Detection. In: 2010 International Conference on Computing, Control and Industrial Engineering, CCIE 2010. 1:304–307. doi:10.1109/CCIE.2010.84.
51.
GartnerBL.2005. Assessing wood characteristics and wood quality in intensively managed plantations. J For. doi:10.1093/jof/103.2.75.
52.
Gil-MorenoD, Ridley-EllisDJ.2015. Comparing usefulness of acoustic measurements on standing trees for segregation by timber stiffness. In: Proceedings of 19th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. p. 378–385. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
53.
GilbertEA, SmileyT.2004. Picus sonic tomography for the quantification of decay in White Oak (Quercus Alba) and Hickory (Carya Spp.). J Arboric. 30(5):277–281.
54.
GonçalvesR, PedrosoCB, MassakMV, BatistaF, SeccoCB.2011. Technical note: velocity of ultrasonic waves in live trees and in freshly-felled logs. Wood Fiber Sci. 43(2):232–235.
55.
GrabianowskiM, ManleyB, WalkerJ.2004. Impact of stocking and exposure on outerwood acoustic properties of Pinus Radiata in Eyrewell Forest. Professional paper. N Z J For. 13–17. 1F9BCE-7CA2-4D18-9F05-C5B8A540D219.pdf.
56.
GrabianowskiM, ManleyB, WalkerJCF.2006. Acoustic measurements on standing trees, logs and green lumber. Wood Sci Technol. 40(3):205–216. doi:10.1007/s00226-005-0038-5.
57.
HabermehlA. (1982a). A new non-destructive method for determining internal wood condition and decay in living trees. Ii: results and further developments. Arboric J6 (2). doi:10.1080/03071375.1982.9746558.
58.
HabermehlA. (1982b) A new non-destructive method for determining internal wood condition and decay in living trees. Part 1. Principles, method and apparatus. Arboric J. doi:10.1080/03071375.1982.9746543.
59.
HainesDW, LebanJM, HerbéC.1996. Determination of Young's modulus for Spruce, Fir and Isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic methods. Wood Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/bf00229348.
60.
HalabeUB, BidigaluGM, GangaRaoHVS, RossRJ.1997. Nondestructive evaluation of green wood using stress wave and transverse vibration techniques. Mater Eval. 55(4):1013–1018.
61.
HansenH.2006. Acoustic studies on wood. Msc Thesis. The New Zealand School of Forestry University of Canterbury. p. 146.
62.
HarrisPD, AndrewsMK.1999. Tools and acoustic techniques for measuring wood stiffness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Wood Quality Symposium: Emerging Technologies for Evaluating Wood Quality for Processing. Rotorua, New Zealand: Forest Industry Engineering Association.
63.
HarrisP, PetherickR, AndrewsM.2002. Acoustic resonance tools. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. 19–21 Aug 2002, Berkeley (CA). p. 195–201.
64.
HoloyenS, BirkelandR.1987. Industrial methods for internal scanning of log defects: a program report on an ongoing project in Norway. In: Proceedings, 2nd International Conference on Scanning Technology in Sawmilling. San Francisco (CA). Hoyle.
65.
HoyleRJ, PellerinRF.1978. Stress wave inspection of a wood structure. In: Proceedings, 4th Symposium on Non-Destructive Testing of Wood, 33–45. Pullman (WA): Washington State University.
66.
HsuCY.2003. Radiata Pine Wood anatomy structure and biophysical properties. Phd Thesis. University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. p. 165.
67.
HuangCL.2000. Predicting lumber stiffness of standing trees. In: Proceedings, 12th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. p. 173–179. University of Western Hungary; Sopron.
68.
HuangCL, LindströmH, NakadaR, RalstonJ.2003. Cell wall structure and wood properties determined by acoustics – a selective review. Holz Als Roh - Und Werkstoff. doi:10.1007/s00107-003-0398-1.
69.
IdeJ. M. (1935). Some dynamic methods for determination of Young's modulus. Rev Sci Instrum6 (10). doi:10.1063/1.1751876.
70.
IkedaK, ArimaT.2000. Quality evaluation of standing trees by a stress-wave propagation method and its application II. Evaluation of Sugi stands and application to production of Sugi (Cryptomeria Japonica D. Don) structural square sawn Timber. Mokuzai Gakkaishi/J Jpn Wood Res Soc. 46(3):189–196.
71.
IkedaK, KinoN.2000. Quality evaluation of standing trees by a stress-wave propagation method and its application I. Seasonal changes of moisture contents of Sugi standing trees and evaluation with stress-wave propagation velocity. Mokuzai Gakkaishi/J Jpn Wood Res Soc. 46(3):181–188.
72.
IlicJ.2003. Dynamic MOE of 55 species using small wood beams. Holz Als Roh – Und Werkstoff. doi:10.1007/s00107-003-0367-8.
73.
IvkovićM, GapareWJ, AbarquezA, IlicJ, PowellMB, WuHX.2009. Prediction of wood stiffness, strength, and shrinkage in juvenile wood of Radiata Pine. Wood Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s00226-008-0232-3.
74.
ÍñiguezG, ArriagaF, BobadillaI, EstebanM.2008. Grading by non-destructive techniques and assessment of the mechanical properties of large cross section Coniferous Sawn Timber for structural use. In 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering 2008.
75.
JoeB, DicksonR, RaymondC, IiicJ, MathesonC.2004. Prediction of Eucalyptus Dunnii and Pinus Radiata Timber stiffness using acoustics. Reports – RIRDC Publication No 04/013.
76.
JohnstoneD., MooreG., TauszM & NicolasM.2015. The measurement of wood decay in landscape trees. Arboricult Urban For. 36(3):121–127.
77.
JohnstoneD, MooreG, TauszM, NicolasM.2010. The measurement of plant vitality in landscape trees. Arboric J. 35(1):18–27. doi:10.1080/03071375.2013.783746.
78.
KangH., & BookerR. F. (2002). Variation of stress wave velocity with MC and temperature. Wood Sci Technol36 (1). doi:10.1007/s00226-001-0129-x.
79.
KoizumiA, UedaK.1987. Estimation of mechanical properties of standing trees by bending tests, 3: modulus of elasticity of tree trunks of plantation-grown conifers. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 33:450–456.
80.
KrajncL, FarrellyN, HarteAM.2019a. The influence of crown and stem characteristics on timber quality in softwoods. For Ecol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.043.
81.
KrajncL, KaduncA, StražeA.2019b. The use of ultrasound velocity and damping for the detection of internal structural defects in standing trees of European Beech and Norway Spruce. Holzforschung. 73(9). doi:10.1515/hf-2018-0245.
82.
LarssonB, BengtssonB, GustafssonM.2004. Nondestructive detection of decay in living trees. Tree Physiol. 24(7). doi:10.1093/treephys/24.7.853.
83.
LasserreJP, MasonEG, WattMS.2004. The influence of initial stocking on corewood stiffness in a clonal experiment of 11-year-old Pinus Radiata D. Don. N Z J For. 49(2):18–23.
84.
LasserreJP, MasonEG, WattMS.2005. The effects of genotype and spacing on Pinus Radiata [D. Don] corewood stiffness in an 11-year old experiment. For Ecol Manag. 205:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.037.
85.
LasserreJP, MasonEG, WattMS.2007. Assessing corewood acoustic velocity and modulus of elasticity with two impact based instruments in 11-year-old trees from a clonal-spacing experiment of Pinus Radiata D. Don. For Ecol Manag. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.12.009.
86.
LasserreJP, MasonEG, WattMS.2008. Influence of the main and interactive effects of site, stand stocking and clone on Pinus Radiata D. Don corewood modulus of elasticity. For Ecol Manag. 255:8-9. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.02.022.
87.
LasserreJP, MasonEG, WattMS, MooreJR.2009. Influence of initial planting spacing and genotype on microfibril angle, wood density, fibre properties and modulus of elasticity in Pinus Radiata D. Don corewood. For Ecol Manag. 258(9). doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.07.028.
88.
LaunayJ, RozenbergP, PaquesL, DewitteJM.2000. A new experimental device for rapid measurement of the trunk equivalent modulus of elasticity on standing trees. Ann For Sci. doi:10.1051/forest:2000126.
89.
LeggM, BradleyS.2016. Measurement of stiffness of standing trees and felled logs using acoustics: a review. J Acoust Soc Am. 139(2):588–604. doi:10.1121/1.4940210.
90.
LeiY. C., ZhangS. Y., & JiangZ. (2005). Models for predicting lumber bending MOR and MOE based on tree and stand characteristics in Black Spruce. Wood Sci Technol39 (1). doi:10.1007/s00226-004-0269-x.
91.
LiL, WangX, WangL, AllisonRB.2012. Acoustic tomography in relation to 2D ultrasonic velocity and hardness mappings. Wood Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s00226-011-0426-y.
92.
LiangS, WangX, WiedenbeckJ, CaiZ, FuF.2008. Evaluation of acoustic tomography for tree decay detection. 15th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood.
93.
LinCJ, ChungCH, WuML, ChoCL.2013. Detection of Phellinus Noxius decay in Sterculia Foetida tree. J Trop For Sci. 25(4):487–496.
94.
LindströmH, HarrisP, NakadaR.2002. Methods for measuring stiffness of Young trees. Holz Als Roh - Und Werkstoff. 60(3):165–174. doi:10.1007/s00107-002-0292-2.
95.
LiuF, WangX, ZhangH, JiangF, YuW, LiangS, FuF, RossRJ.2020. Acoustic wave propagation in standing trees – Part I. Numerical simulation. Wood Fiber Sci. 52(1):53–72. doi:10.22382/wfs-2020-006.
96.
LlanaDF, Iñiguez-GonzalezG, ArriagaF, WangX.2016. Time-of-flight adjustment procedure for acoustic measurements in structural timber. BioResources. 11(2):3303–3317. doi:10.15376/biores.11.2.3303-3317.
97.
LlanaD. F., & ShortI. (2020). Use of non-destructive test methods on Irish Hardwood standing trees and small-diameter round timber for prediction of mechanical properties. Ann For Sci77, 62 (2020). doi:10.1007/s13595-020-00957-x
98.
LowellEC, TodorokiCL, DykstraDP, BriggsDG.2014. Linking acoustic velocity of standing Douglas-Fir trees to Veneer stiffness: a tree-log-product study across thinning treatments. N Z J For Sci. 44:1–16. doi:10.1186/1179-5395-44-1.
99.
MahonJM.2007. The use of acoustics for the wood quality assessment of standing P. Taeda Trees. Msc Thesis. BSFR, The University of Georgia. p. 75.
100.
MahonJM, JordanL, SchimleckLR, ClarkA, DanielsRF.2009. A comparison of sampling methods for a standing tree acoustic device. In South J Appl For. 33(2):62–68. doi:10.1093/sjaf/33.2.62.
101.
MarraGG, PellerinRF, GalliganWL.1966. Nondestructive determination of wood strength and elasticity by vibration. Holz Als Roh- Und Werkstoff. 24(10):460–466. doi:10.1007/bf02612875.
102.
MartinP., ColletR., BarthelemyP., & RoussyG. (1987). Evaluation of wood characteristics: internal scanning of the material by microwaves. Wood Sci Technol21 (4). doi:10.1007/BF00380203.
103.
MattheckCG, BethgeKA.1993. Detection of decay in trees with the metriguard strees wave timer. J Arboric. 19(6):374–378.
104.
McCrackenFI.1985. Using sound to detect decay in standing Hardwood trees. In: Proceedings, 5th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood, Pullman (WA): Washington State University; p. 281–287.
105.
MerloE, Alvarez-GonzalezJG, SantaclaraO, RiescoG.2014. Modelling modulus of elasticity of Pinus Pinaster Ait. in northwestern Spain with standing tree acoustic measurements, tree, stand and site variables. For Syst. 23(1):153–166. doi:10.5424/fs/2014231-04706.
106.
MonteroMJ, MataJ, EstebanV, HermosoE.2015. Influence of moisture content on the wave velocity to estimate the mechanical properties of large cross-section pieces for structural use of scots Pine from Spain. Maderas: Ciencia y Tecnologia. 17(2):407–420. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2015005000038.
107.
MooreJ, LyonA, Ridley-EllisD, GardinerB.2008. Properties of UK-grown Sitka Spruce: extent and sources of variation. In 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering 2008. Vol. 2.
108.
MooreJR, LyonAJ, SearlesGJ, LehnekeSA, Ridley-EllisDJ.2013. Within- and between-stand variation in selected properties of Sitka Spruce Sawn Timber in the UK: implications for segregation and grade recovery. Ann For Sci. 70(1):403–415. doi:10.1007/s13595-013-0275-y.
109.
MoraCR, SchimleckLR, MahonJM, IsikF, MahonJM, ClarkA, DanielsRF.2009. Relationships between acoustic variables and different measures of stiffness in standing Pinus Taeda trees. Can J For Res. 39(8):1421–1429. doi:10.1139/X09-062.
110.
MüllerU, BammerR, HalmschlagerE, StollbergerR, WimmerR.2001. Detection of Fungal wood decay using magnetic resonance imaging. Holz Als Roh - Und Werkstoff. 59(3):190–194. doi:10.1007/s001070100202.
111.
NakamuraN.1996. Measurement of the properties of standing trees with ultrasonics and mapping of the properties. Univ For Hokkaido Fac Agric Univ Tokyo J. 96(1):125–135.
112.
NanamiN, NakamuraN, ArimaT, OkumaM.1992. Measuring the properties of standing trees with stress waves II. Application of the method to standing trees. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 38(8):747–752.
113.
NanamiN, NakamuraN, ArimaT, OkumaM.1993. Measuring the properties of standing trees with stress waves III. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 39(8):903–909.
114.
NicolottiGL, SoccoV, MartinisR, GodioA, SambuelliL.2003. Application and comparison of three tomographic techiques for detection decay in trees. J Arboric. 29(3):66–78.
115.
OlaoyeKO.2019. Investigation into the determination of modulus of elasticity of Gmelina Arborea (Roxb.) wood using a non-destructive acoustic method. Pro Ligno. 15(1):11–16.
116.
OlaoyeKO, Okon-AkanOA.2020. Estimation of modulus of elasticity of Boscia Angustifolia wood using longitudinal vibration acoustic method. Int Wood Prod J. doi:10.1080/20426445.2020.1738118.
117.
OstrovskýR, KobzaM, GažoJ.2017. Extensively damaged trees tested with acoustic tomography considering tree stability in urban greenery. Trees – Structure and Function. doi:10.1007/s00468-017-1526-6.
118.
OuisD.2002. On the frequency dependence of the modulus of elasticity of wood. Wood Sci Technol. 36(4):335–346. doi:10.1007/s00226-002-0145-5.
119.
OuisD. (2003). Non destructive techniques for detecting decay in standing trees. Arboric J27 (2). doi:10.1080/03071375.2003.9747371.
120.
PalmerDJ, KimberleyMO, CownDJ, McKinleyRB.2013. Assessing prediction accuracy in a Regression Kriging Surface of Pinus Radiata outerwood density across New Zealand. For Ecol Manag. 308:9–16. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.024.
121.
ParadisN, AutyD, CarterP, AchimA.2013. Using a standing-tree acoustic tool to identify forest stands for the production of mechanically-graded lumber. Sensors (Switzerland). 13(3):3394–3408. doi:10.3390/s130303394.
122.
ProtoAR, MacríG, BernardiniV, RussoD, ZimbalattiG.2017. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality with a non-destructive method in standing trees: a first survey in Italy. IForest. doi:10.3832/ifor2065-010.
123.
QiuQ, QinR, LamJH, TangMC, LeungWK, LauD.2019. An innovative tomographic technique integrated with acoustic-laser approach for detecting defects in tree trunk. Comput Electron Agric. 156. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.017.
124.
RaymondCA, JoeB, AndersonDW, WattDJ.2008. Effect of thinning on relationships between three measures of wood stiffness in Pinus Radiata: standing trees vs. logs vs. short clear specimens. Can J For Res. doi:10.1139/X08-124.
125.
RaymondCA, JoeB, EvansR, DicksonRL.2007. Relationship between timber grade, static and dynamic modulus of elasticity, and SilviScan properties for Pinus Radiata in New South Wales. N Z J For Sci. 37(2):186–196.
126.
RaynerT.2001. The implication of using a CT-based scanner for log breakdown optimization. In: Proc. of the Ninth International Conference on Scanning Technology and Process Optimization for the Wood Industry (ScanTech 2001), p. 9–25. Seattle (WA).
127.
RossRJ.2015. Nondestructive evaluation of wood. Reports. Second edi. Vol. 48. Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Madison (WI): U.S.
128.
RossRJ, McdonaldKA, GreenDW, SchadKC.1997. Relationship between log and lumber modulus of elasticity. For Prod J. 47(2):89–92.
129.
RossRJ, PellerinRF.1988. NDE of wood-based composites with longitudinal stress waves. For Prod J. 38(5):39–45.
130.
RossRJ, ZerbeJI, WangX, GreenDW, PellerinRF.2005. Stress wave nondestructive evaluation of Douglas-Fir Peeler cores. For Prod J. 55(3):90–94.
131.
RozenbergP, FrancA, BastienC, CahalanC.2001. Improving models of wood density by including genetic effects: a case study in Douglas-Fir. Ann For Sci. 58(4). doi:10.1051/forest:2001132.
132.
RussoD, MarzilianoPA, MacriG, ProtoAR, ZimbalattiG, LombardiF.2019. Does thinning intensity affect wood quality? An analysis of Calabrian Pine in Southern Italy using a non-destructive acoustic method. Forests. 10(4):1–16. doi:10.3390/f10040303.
133.
RuyM, GonçalvesR, PereiraDM, LorensaniRG, BertoldoC.2018. Ultrasound grading of round Eucalyptus Timber using the Brazilian standard. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. doi:10.1007/s00107-018-1292-1.
134.
SantaclaraO, MerloE.2011. Acoustic segregation of pinus pinaster logs for structural lumber production according to strength classes. In: Proceedings of 17th International Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation of Wood Symposium. p. 755. Sopron, Hungary.
135.
SchmoldtDL, ScheinmanE, RinnhoferA, OccenaLG.2000. Internal log scanning: research to reality. In: Proc. of the Twenty Eighth Annual Hardwood Symp., edited by D.A. Meyer. p. 103–114.
136.
SharpDJ.1985. Nondestructive testing techniques for manufacturing LVL and predicting performance. In: Proceedings of the 5th Nondestructive Testing of Wood Symposium. p. 99–108. Washington State University, Pullman (WA).
137.
SimicK, GendvilasV, O'ReillyC, HarteAM.2019. Predicting structural timber grade-determining properties using acoustic and density measurements on Young Sitka spruce trees and logs. Holzforschung. 73(2):139–149. doi:10.1515/hf-2018-0073.
138.
SimpsonWT, WangX.2001. Relationship between longitudinal stress wave transit time and moisture content of lumber during Kiln-drying. For Prod J. 51(10):51–54.
139.
SmithKT, ShortleWC.1988. Electrical resistance and wood decay by White Rot Fungi. Mycologia. 80(1):124–126. doi:10.1080/00275514.1988.12025510.
140.
SoCL, ViaBK, GroomLH, SchimleckLR, ShupeTF, KelleySK, RialsTG.2004. Near infrared spectroscopy in the forest products industry. For Prod J. 54(3):6–16.
141.
SogeAO, PopoolaOI, AdetoyinboAA.2018. Detection of decay and hollows in living almond trees (Terminalia Catappa L. Roxb.) using electrical resistivity method. J Indian Acad Wood Sci. 15(2):181–189. doi:10.1007/s13196-018-0224-3.
142.
SogeAO, PopoolaOI, AdetoyinboAA.2019. A four-point electrical resistivity method for detecting wood decay and hollows in living trees. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 77(3):465–474. doi:10.1007/s00107-019-01402-1.
143.
SogeAO, PopoolaOI, AdetoyinboAA.2021. Detection of wood decay and cavities in living trees: a review. Can J For Res. 51(7):937–947. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0340.
144.
SotoL, ValenzuelaL, LasserreJP.2012. Effect of initial planting density in dynamic modulus of elasticity in standing trees and logs of 28 years old Radiata Pine plantation in Sandy Soil, Chile. Maderas: Ciencia y Technologia. 14:2. doi:10.4067/S0718-221X2012000200008.
145.
ŠtefančíkI, VacekZ., SharmaR. P., VacekS., & RösslováM. (2018). Effect of thinning regimes on growth and development of crop trees in Fagus Sylvatica stands of Central Europe over fifty years. Dendrobiology79. doi:10.12657/denbio.079.013.
146.
TakataK, TeraokaY.2002. Genotypic effects on the variation of wood quality and growth traits in plantation forest made by cutting cultivars of Japanese Cedar. J Wood Sci. doi:10.1007/BF00767286.
147.
ToulminMJ, RaymondCA.2007. Developing a sampling strategy for measuring acoustic velocity in standing Pinus Radiata using the treetap time of flight tool. N Z J For Sci. 37(1):96–111.
148.
TsehayeA, BuchananAH, WalkerJCF.2000. Sorting of logs using acoustics. Wood Sci Technol. 34(4):337–344. doi:10.1007/s002260000048.
149.
UusitaloJ.1997. Pre-harvest measurement of pine stands for sawing production planning. Acta Forestalia Fennica. 259(1):1–56. doi:10.14214/aff.7519.
150.
VanninenP, YlitaloH, SievänenR, MäkeläA.1996. Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.). Trees – Struct Funct. 10(4):231–238. doi:10.1007/BF02185674.
151.
Vargas-HernandezJ, AdamsWT.1994. Genetic relationships between wood density components and cambial growth rhythm in Young Coastal Douglas-Fir. Can J For Res. 24(9):1871–1876. doi:10.1139/x94-241.
152.
VegaA, GonzálezL, FernándezI, GonzálezP.2019. Grading and mechanical characterization of small-diameter round Chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) timber from thinning operations. Wood Mater Sci Eng. doi:10.1080/17480272.2017.1387174.
153.
WaghornMJ, MasonEG, WattMS.2007. Influence of initial stand density and genotype on longitudinal variation in modulus of elasticity for 17-year-old Pinus Radiata. For Ecol Manag. 252:1-3. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.019.
154.
WagnerFG, GormanTM, WuSY.2003. Assessment of intensive stress-wave scanning of Douglas-Fir trees for predicting lumber MOE. For Prod J. 53(3):36–42.
155.
WalkerJCF, NakadaR.1999. Understanding corewood in some softwoods: a selective review on stiffness and acoustics. Int For Rev. 1(4):1–9.
156.
WangX.1999. Stress wave-based nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods for wood quality of standing trees. Phd Thesis. Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan. p. 187.
157.
WangX.2013. Acoustic measurements on trees and logs: a review and analysis. Wood Sci Technol. 47(5):965–975. doi:10.1007/s00226-013-0552-9.
158.
WangX, AllisonRB.2008. Decay detection in red oak trees using a combination of visual inspection, acoustic testing, and resistance microdrilling. Arboricult Urban For. 34(1):1–4.
159.
WangX, CarterP.2015. Chapter 8: Acoustic assessment of wood quality in trees and logs. Nondestructive evaluation of wood: second ed. General Technical Report FPL–GTR–238.
WangSY, LinFC, JaneMC, LinCJ, HungCP.2000a. Effects of Taiwania, thinning and pruning on DBH and ultrasonic wave velocity in resort, Cryptomerioide. In World Conference on Timber Engineering. Whistler British Columbia, Canada.
162.
WangX, RossRJ, McClellanM, BarbourRJ, EricksonJR, ForsmanJW, McGinnisGD.2000b. Strength and stiffness assessment of standing trees using a nondestructive stress wave technique. Research Paper Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service (FPL-RP-585).
163.
WangX, RossRJ, McClellanM, BarbourRJ, EricksonJR, ForsmanJW, McGinnisGD.2001. Nondestructive evaluation of standing trees with a stress wave method. Wood Fiber Sci. 33(4):522–533.
164.
WangX, RossRJ, MattsonJA, EricksonJR, ForsmanJW, GeskeEA, WehrMA.2002a. Nondestructive evaluation techniques for assessing modulus of elasticity and stiffness of small-diameter logs. For Prod J. 52(2):79–85.
165.
WangX, RossRJ, EricksonJR, ForsmanJW, JukuriGD, YarbroughEB.2002b. Timber assessment at Quincy Mine Blacksmith Shop, Keweenaw National Historical Park. APT Bulletin. doi:10.2307/1504759.
166.
WangXP, DivosF, PilonC, BrashawBK, RossRJ, PellerinRF.2004a. Assessment of decay in standing timber using stress wave timing nondestructive evaluation tools – a guide for use and interpretation. General Technical Report – Forest Products Laboratory, USDA Forest Service. p. 12.
167.
WangX, RossRJ, GreenDW, BrashawBK, EnglundK, WolcottM.2004b. Stress wave sorting of red maple logs for structural quality. Wood Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s00226-003-0202-8.
168.
WangX, RossRJ, BrashawBK, PunchesJ, EricksonJR, ForsmanJW, PellerinRF.2004c. Diameter effect on stress-wave evaluation of modulus of elasticity of logs. Wood Fiber Sci. 36(3):368–377.
169.
WangSY, LinCJ, ChiuCM, ChenJH, YungTH.2005a. Dynamic modulus of elasticity and bending properties of young Taiwania trees grown with different thinning and pruning treatments. J Wood Sci. 51(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s10086-004-0622-6.
170.
WangSY, LinCJ, ChiuCM.2005b. Evaluation of wood quality of Taiwania Trees grown with different thinning and pruning treatments using ultrasonic-wave testing. Wood Fiber Sci. 37(2):192–200.
171.
WangX, RossRJ, CarterP.2005c. Acoustic evaluation of standing trees – recent research development. In: Proceedings, 14th International Symposium on Nondestructive Testing of Wood. p. 455–465. Hannover, Germany.
172.
WangX, WiedenbeckJ, RossRJ, ForsmanJW, PilonC, BrashawBK.2005d. Nondestructive evaluation of incipient decay in hardwood logs. Technology Review. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-162. Madison (WI): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 11 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/FPL-GTR-162.
173.
WangX, CarterP, RossRJ, BrashawBK.2007a. Acoustic assessment of wood quality of raw forest materials – a path to increased profitability. For Prod J. 57(5):6–14.
174.
WangX, RossRJ, CarterP.2007b. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Part I. Acoustic wave behavior. Wood Fiber Sci. 39(1):28–29.
175.
WangX, AllisonRB, WangL, RossRJ.2007c. Acoustic tomography for decay detection in Red Oak trees. Research Paper FPL-RP-642. Madison (WI): U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. p. 7. https://doi.org/10.2737/FPL-RP-642.
176.
WangX, WiedenbeckJ, LiangS.2009. Acoustic tomography for decay detection in black cherry trees. Wood Fiber Sci. 41(2):127–137.
177.
WarrenE. R., SmithG. B., ApiolazaL. A., & WalkerJ. C.F. (2009). Effect of stocking on juvenile wood stiffness for three eucalyptus species. New For37 (3). doi:10.1007/s11056-008-9120-9.
178.
WatsonLT.2013. Evaluating the effects of initial stocking, physiological age and species on wood stiffness, Bsc Thesis. New Zealand School of Forestry, University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand. p. 43.
179.
WesselsCB, MalanFS, RypstraT.2011. A review of measurement methods used on standing trees for the prediction of some mechanical properties of timber. Eur J For Res. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0484-6.
180.
WesselsCB, PriceCS, TurnerP, DellMP.2006. Integrating harvesting and sawmill operations using an optimized sawmill production planning system. In: Proceedings of the International Precision Forestry Symposium. Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
181.
WielingaB, RaymondCA, JamesR, MathesonAC.2009. Effect of green density values on Pinus Radiata stiffness estimation using a stress-wave technique. N Z J For Sci. 39(1):71–79.
182.
WilcoxWW.1988. Detection of early stages of wood decay with ultrasonic pulse velocity. For Prod J. 38(5):68–73.
183.
YamamotoK, SulaimanO, HashimR.1998. Nondestructive detection of Heart Rot of Acacia Mangium trees in Malaysia. For Prod J. 48(3):83–86.
184.
YinY, NagaoH, LiuX, NakaiT.2010. Mechanical properties assessment of Cunninghamia Lanceolata plantation wood with three acoustic-based nondestructive methods. J Wood Sci. doi:10.1007/s10086-009-1067-8.
185.
ZhangS. Y.1995. Effect of growth rate on wood specific gravity and selected mechanical properties in individual species from distinct wood categories. Wood Sci Technol. 29 (6). doi:10.1007/BF00194204.
186.
ZhangH, WangX, SuJ.2011. Experimental investigation of stress wave propagation in standing trees. Holzforschung. doi:10.1515/HF.2011.059.
187.
ZobelBJ, van BuijtenenJP.1989. Wood variation its cause and control. In: Bruhlsche Universitatsdruckerei, Giessen, edited by TE Timell. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; p. 318–248.
