An innovative eco-friendly technology, applied to improve the quality of the short rotation teak, was wood modification by heat treatment. The study was to investigate the effects of heat treatment at 180°C, 200°C, and 220°C on the characteristics of the short rotation teak. The results show that the short rotation teak degraded hemicellulose and increased α-cellulose and lignin after the heat treatment. Anti-swelling efficiency value after heat treatment was improved ranging between 12.9% and 46.7%, indicating an improvement in dimensional stability. The MOE and MOR values decreased after heat treatment. The heat treated sample at 180°C after graveyard test was the lowest in weight loss, which presented good durability against termite (rating 9) and decay (rating 10). The surface roughness and SFE values decreased as the heating temperature increased. The heat treated at 220°C provided the lowest K-values (0.04 for acrylic and 5.04 for alkyd paint) which indicate the poorest wettability.
American Society for Testing and Material. 2007. ASTM D1107-96. Standard test methods for ethanol-toluene solubility of wood. West Conshohocken (PA): American Standard Institution.
2.
American Society for Testing and Material. 2007. ASTM D1758-06. Standard test method of evaluating wood preservatives by field tests with stakes. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM.
3.
American Standard for Testing and Materials. 1996. ASTM D 143-05. Standard methods of testing small clear specimens of timber. In: Annual book of ASTM standard. New York (NY): American Standard Institution; p. 1–31.
4.
American Standard Testing and Material. 2007. ASTM D3359-02. Standard test methods for adhesion by tape test. In: Annual book of ASTM standard. West Conshohocken (PA): American Standard Institution; p. 1–7.
5.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2018. Statistik Produksi kehutanan. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik.
6.
Badan Pusat Statistik. 2019. Statistik Produksi kehutanan. Jakarta (ID): Badan Pusat Statistik.
7.
BasriE, WahyudiI.2013. Wood basic properties of jati Plus Perhutani from different ages and their relationships to drying properties and qualities. J Penelit Has Hutan.31(2):93–102. doi:10.20886/jphh.2013.31.2.93-102
8.
BoonstraM, TjeerdsmaB.2006. Chemical analysis of heat-treated softwoods. Holz Roh-Werkst. 64:204–211. doi:10.1007/s00107-005-0078-4
9.
BrowningBL.1967. Methods of wood chemistry. New York (NY): Interscience Publishers.
10.
BuyuksariU, AvciE, AyrilmisN, AkkilicH.2010. Effect of pinus cone ratio on the wettability and surface roughness of particleboard. BioResources5(3):1824–1833.
11.
ChuD, XueL, ZhangY, KangL, MuJ.2016. Surface characteristics of poplar wood with high-temperature heat treatment: wettability and surface brittleness. BioResources11(3):6948–6967.
12.
DarmawanW, NandikaD, NoviyantiE, AliprajaI, LumonggaD, GardnerD, GerardinP.2017. Wettability and bonding quality of exterior coating on jabon and sengon wood surfaces. J Coat Technol Res. 15:95–104. doi:10.1007/s11998-017-9954-1
13.
DarmawanW, NandikaD, SariRK, SitompulA, RahayuI, GardnerD.2015. Juvenile and mature wood characteristics of short and long rotation teak in Java. IAWA J. 36(4):429–443. doi:10.1163/22941932-20150112
14.
DenceCW.1992. The determination of lignin. In: LinSY, DenceCW, editors. Methodes in lignin chemistry. Berlin (DE): Springer-Verlag; p. 33–61.
15.
EstevesBM, GracaJ, PereiraH.2008. Extractive composition and summative chemical analysis of thermally treated eucalypt wood. Holzforschung62:344–351.
16.
EstevesBM, PereiraHM.2009. Wood modification by heat treatment: a review. BioResources4(1):370–404. doi:10.15376/biores.4.1.370-404
17.
EvansJ, SenftJF, GreenDW.2000. Juvenile wood effect in red alder: analysis of physical and mechanical data to delineate juvenile and mature wood zones. For Prod J.50:75–87.
18.
FangZ, QiuY, KuffelE.2004. Formation of hydrophobic coating on glass surface using atmospheric pressure non-thermal plasma in ambient air. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 37:2261. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/37/16/007
19.
GérardinP, PetriM, PetrissansM, LambertJ, EhrhrardtJJ.2007. Evolution of wood surface free energy after heat treatment. Polym Degrad Stab. 92:653–657. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.01.016
20.
HillCAS.2006. Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. West Sussex (UK): Wiley.
21.
HuangX, KocaefeD, KocaefeY, BolukY, PichetteA.2012. Changes in wettability of heat-treated wood due to artificial weathering. Wood Sci Technol.46(6):1215–1237. doi:10.1007/s00226-012-0479-6
22.
International Organization for Standardization. 1997. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) surface texture: profile method. Terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. Geneva (SW): International Organization for Standardization. ISO 4287-1977.
23.
KamdemDP, PizziA, JermannaudA.2002. Durability of heat-treated wood. Holz Roh-Werkst.60(1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s00107-001-0261-1
24.
KarlinasariL, LestariAT, PriadiT.2018. Evaluation of surface roughness and wettability of heat-treated, fast-growing tropical wood species sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L.) I.C.Nielsen), jabon (Anthocephalus cadamba (Roxb.) Miq), and acacia (Acacia mangium Willd.). Int Wood Prod J.9:142–148. doi:10.1080/20426445.2018.1516918
25.
KorkutS, HizirogluS.2009. Effect of heat treatment on mechanical properties of hazelnut wood s(Corylus colurna L.). Mater Des. 30:1853–1858. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.009
26.
KoubaaA, IsabelN, Shu YinZ, BeaulieuJ, BousquetJ.2005. Transition from juvenile to mature wood in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill. B.S.P.). Wood Fib Sci.37:445–455.
27.
LopesJO, GarciaRA, NascimentoAM.2018. Wettability of the surface of heat-treated juvenile teak wood assessed by drop shape analyzer. Maderas: Cienc Tecnol20(2):249–256.
28.
MarthaR, DirnaFC, HasanusiA, RahayuIS, DarmawanW.2020. Surface free energy of 10 tropical woods species and their acrylic paint wettability. J Adhes Sci Technol. 34(2):167–177. doi:10.1080/01694243.2019.1663009
29.
MeijerMD, MilitzH.2001. Moisture transport in coated wood. Part 2: influence of coating type, film thickness, wood species, temperature and moisture gradient on kinetics of sorption and dimensional change. Holz Roh-Werkst.58:467–475. doi:10.1007/s001070050461
30.
MoharebA, SirmahP, PetrissansM, GérardinP.2012. Effect of heat treatment intensity on wood chemical composition and decay durability of Pinus patula. Eur J Wood Prod.70:519–524. doi:10.1007/s00107-011-0582-7
31.
NuopponenM, VuorinenT, JamsaS, ViitaniemiP.2003. Thermal modification in softwood studied by FT-IR and UV resonance Raman spectroscopies. J Wood Chem Technol. 24(1):13–26. doi:10.1081/WCT-120035941
32.
PratiwiLA, DarmawanW, PriadiT, GeorgeB, MerlinA, GérardinC, DumarcayS, GérardinP.2019. Characterization of thermally modified short and long rotation teaks and the effects on coatings performance. Maderas Cienc Tecnol. 21(2):209–222.
33.
PriadiT, SuharjoAAC, KarlinasariL.2019. Dimensional stability and colour change of heat-treated young teak wood. Inter Wood Prod J. 10:119–125. doi:10.1080/20426445.2019.1679430
34.
QinZ, ChenH, GaoQ, ZhangS.2014. Wettability of sanded and aged fast-growing poplar wood surfaces: I surface free energy. BioResources10(1):1008–1023.
35.
RabelW.1971. Einige Aspekte der Benetzungstheorie and ihre Anwendung auf die Untersuchung und Verä;nderung der Oberflä;cheneigenschaften von Polymeren. Fabre und Lack. 77(10):997–1006.
36.
RathkeJ, SinnG.2013. Evaluating the wettability of MUF resins and pMDI on two different OSB raw materials. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 71(3):335–342. doi:10.1007/s00107-013-0675-6
37.
RautkariL, HonkanenJ, HillCAS, Ridley-EllisD, HughesM.2014. Mechanical and physical properties of thermally modified Scot pine wood in high pressure reactor under saturated steam at 120, 150, and 180°C. Eur J Wood Prod.72:33–41. doi:10.1007/s00107-013-0749-5
38.
RizantiDE, DarmawanW, GeorgeB, MerlinA, DumarcayS, ChapuisH, GérardinC, GelhayeE, RaharivelomananaP, SariRK, 2018. Comparison of teak wood properties according to forest management: short versus long rotation. Ann For Sci. 75(2):39. doi:10.1007/s13595-018-0716-8
39.
RowellRM, EllisWD.1978. Determination of dimensional stabilization wood using the water soak method. Wood Fiber.10(2):104–111.
40.
SalmanS, ThévenonMF, PétrissansA, DumarcayS, CandelierK, GérardinP.2017. Improvement of the durability of heat-treated wood against termites. Maderas Cienc Tecnol.19(3):317–328.
SivrikayaH, CanA, de TroyaT, CondeM.2015. Comparative biological resistance of differently thermal modified wood species against decay fungi, Reticulitermes grassei and Hylotrupes bajulus. Maderas Cienc Tecnol.17(3):559–570.
43.
Standar Nasional Indonesia. 2006. Uji Ketahanan Kayu dan Produk Kayu terhadap Organisme Perusak Kayu. Jakarta (ID): Badan Standarisasi Nasional.
44.
Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry. 1999. T-203 alpha-, beta-, gamma-cellulose in pulp. Atlanta (GA): TAPPI.
45.
Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry. 1999. T-207 water solubility of wood and pulp. Atlanta (GA): TAPPI.
46.
Technical Association of Pulp and Paper Industry. 2002. T-212 one percent sodium hydroxide solubility of wood and pulp. Atlanta (GA): TAPPI.
47.
TsoumisG.1991. Science of technology of wood (structure, properties, utilization). New York (NY): Van Nostrand Reinhold.
48.
WålinderMEP.2002. Study of Lewis acid-base properties of wood by contact angle analysis. Holzforschung56:363–371. doi:10.1515/HF.2002.058
49.
YildizS, TomakED, YildizUC, UstaomerD.2013. Effect of artificial weathering on the properties of heat-treated wood. Polym Degrad Stab. 98:1419–1427. doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2013.05.004
50.
YuningsihI, RahayuIS, DumasariL, DarmawanW.2019. Wettability and adherence of acrylic paints on long and short rotation teaks. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 15:229–236. doi:10.1080/17480272.2019.1575903
