The aim of this paper is to study the possible influence of poplar cultivar and soil on the mechanical properties of plywood produced from 10 cultivars having grown in different soils. For each cultivar, two trees were harvested per station; crosscut into bolts then peeled 1.4 mm thick for one tree and 3 mm thick for the other one: in total, 80 trees were sampled. The veneers were used to make 160 boards using 2 adhesives: polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) and melamine-urea-formaldehyde (MUF). These boards were then cut into standardized samples for non-destructive and destructive mechanical tests. The properties of plywood were characterized by measuring their density, modulus of elasticity and modulus of rupture. The results showed that poplar plywood properties could be influenced by adhesive and veneer thickness. The cultivar and soil effects were never relevant. A tight correlation was found between destructive and non-destructive modulus of elasticity tests.
Abdul KhalilHPS, Nurul FazitaaMR, BhataAH, JawaidaM, Nik FuadbNA.2010. Development and material properties of new hybrid plywood from oil palm biomass. Mater Des. 31:417–424. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.05.040
2.
Alía-MartínezMJ, Sanz-GarcíaA, Fernández-MartínezR, Fernández-CenicerosJ, Martínez-de-Pisón-AscacíbarFJ.2012. The use of black poplar plywood as a structural component of prefabricated buildings. Conference Paper XVI Congreso Internacional de Ingeniería de Proyectos Valencia; 11–13 July 2012.
3.
BaarJ, TippnerJ, RademacherP.2015. Prediction of mechanical properties – modulus of rupture and modulus of elasticity – of five tropical species by nondestructive methods Maderas. Cien Tecnol. 17(2):239–252.
4.
BalBC, BektasI.2014. Some mechanical properties of plywood produced from eucalyptus, beech, and poplar veneer. Mader Cien Tecnol. 16(1):99–108.
5.
BallJ, CarleJ, Del LungoA.2005. Contribution des peupliers et des saules à la valorisation durable des forêts et au développement rural. Unasylva 221. 5:3–9.
6.
BekhtaP, MarutzkyR.2007. Reduction of glue consumption in the plywood production by using previously compressed veneer. Holz als Roh- Werkstoff. 65:87–88. doi: 10.1007/s00107-006-0142-8
7.
BerthelotA, MaineP, BouvetA, Da Silva PerezD.2010. Caractéristiques générales du bois et des fibres. Dossier Qualités du bois de peuplier. Forêt Entreprise. 191:22–26.
8.
BordonnePA.1989. Module dynamique et frottement intérieur dans le bois: mesures sur poutres flottantes en vibration naturelle [PhD thesis]. Nancy, France: Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, p. 154.
9.
BrancheriauL, BailléresH.2002. Natural vibration analysis of clear wooden beams: a theoretical review. Wood Sci Technol. 36:347–365. doi: 10.1007/s00226-002-0143-7
10.
BucurV.2006. Acoustics of wood. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag Berlin. p. 284.
11.
De BoeverL, VansteenkisteD, Van AckerJ, StevensM.2007. End-use related physical and mechanical properties of selected fast-growing poplar hybrids (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides). Ann Wood Sci. 64:621–630. doi: 10.1051/forest:2007040
12.
El HaouzaliH, MarchalR, BleronL, ButaudJC.2010. Déroulage du peuplier: Effets cultivars et stations sur la déroulabilité du peuplier et la qualité des produits issus du déroulage. Forêt Entreprise. 191:27–32.
GoliG, CremoniniC, NegroF, ZanuttiniR, FioravantiM.2014. Physical-mechanical properties and bonding quality of heat treated poplar (I-214 clone) and ceiba plywood. iForest Biogeosci For. 8:687–692. doi: 10.3832/ifor1276-007
16.
HainesDW, LebanJM, HerbéC.1996. Determination of Young's modulus for spruce, fir and isotropic materials by the resonance flexure method with comparisons to static flexure and other dynamic methods. Wood Sci Technol. 30:253–263. doi: 10.1007/BF00229348
17.
H'ngPS, ParidahMT, ChinKL.2010. Bending properties of LVL produced from Keruing (Dipterocarpus sp) reinforced with low density wood species. Asian J Scic Res. 3:118–125. doi: 10.3923/ajsr.2010.118.125
18.
HudaAA, KoubaaA, CloutierA, HemandezRE, FortinY.2014. Variation of the physical and mechanical properties of hybrid poplar clones. BioResour. 9(1):1456–1471. doi: 10.15376/biores.9.1.1456-1471
19.
HudaAA, KoubaaA, CloutierA, HernándezRE, PérinetP, FortinY.2018. Phenotypic and genotypic correlations for wood properties of hybrid poplar clones of Southern Quebec. Forests. 9(3):140. doi: 10.3390/f9030140
20.
KilicY, ColakM, BaysalE, BurdurluE.2006. An investigation of some physical and mechanical properties of laminated veneer lumber manufactured from black alder (Alnus glutinosa) glued with polyvinyl acetate and polyurethane adhesives. For Prod J. 56:56–59.
21.
KlasnjaS, KopitovicS, OrlovicS.2003. Variability of some wood properties of eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides Bartr.) clones. Wood Sci Technol. 37:331–337. doi: 10.1007/s00226-003-0179-3
22.
LutzJF.1974. Techniques for peeling process, slicing, drying veneer, USDA Forest Service Research Paper FPL 228, p 68.
23.
MarchalR, MotheF, DenaudL, ThibautB, BleronL.2009. Cutting forces in wood machining—basics and applications in industrial processes. Holzforschung. 63:157–167. doi: 10.1515/HF.2009.014
24.
OjaJ, KällsnerB, GrundbergS.2005. Predicting the strength of sawn wood products: a comparison between x-ray scanning of logs and machine strength grading of lumber. For Prod J. 55:55–60.
25.
OuisD.1999. Vibrational and acoustical experiments on logs of spruce. Wood Sci Technol. 33:151–184. doi: 10.1007/s002260050106
26.
ÖzalpM, AtılganA, EsenZ, KayaS.2009. Comparing the resistance and bending in the plywood which each made with different glues. J Inst Sci Technol Dumlupınar Univ. 18:99–104.
27.
ÖzenR.1981. The investigations on the effects of various factors on physical and mechanical properties of plywood. Trabzon: Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Forestry publications. No. 9.
28.
PaillassaE.2014. Les peupleraies: Quels enjeux pour l'avenir de la populiculture française?Rev Forrest. Fr. LXVI – 3:301–311.
29.
PliuraA, ZhangSY, MackayJ, BousquetJ.2007. Genotypic variation in wood density and growth traits of poplar hybrids at four clonal trails. For Ecol Manag. 238:92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.082
30.
PolgeH.1973. Facteurs écologiques et qualité du bois. Ann Sci Forest INRA/EDP Sci. 30(3):307–328. doi: 10.1051/forest/19730306
31.
ProchazkaJ, BeranekT, BeránkováJ, BombaJ, BohmM.2018. Synergistic effects of impregnation agents used in plywood production relative to the shear strength of bonded joints. BioRes. 13(4):7232–7243. doi: 10.15376/biores.13.4.7232-7243
32.
QinGH, JiangYZ, QiaoYL.2013. Selection of poplar Hybrid clones (Populus ssp.) from backcrossed progenies of the aigeiros section for industrial Purpo. Silvae Genet. 62(1-2):52–60. doi: 10.1515/sg-2013-0007
33.
RahayuI, DenaudL, ButaudJC, PotG, LegrandG.2013. Qualités technologiques des panneaux contreplaqués et LVL realizes avec les nouveaux cultivars de peuplier. Forêt Entreprise. 213:39–42.
34.
RahayuI, DenaudL, MarchalR, DarmawanW.2015. Ten new poplar cultivars provide laminated veneer lumber for structural application. Ann For Sci. 72:705–715. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0422-0
35.
ReulingD, LanvinJD, BouvertA, ProustE.2010. Les cultivars de peuplier Caractéristiques mécaniques du bois. Dossier Qual bois de peuplier, Forêt entreprise. 191:39–43.
36.
ŠmidriakováM, SedliačikJ, VéghB, BekhtaP.2015. Application of foamed PVAC dispersion in plywood. Acta Facul Xylo Zvolen Prod. 57(2):109–115.
37.
YangJL, IlicY, WardlawT.2003. Relationships between static and dynamic modulus of elasticity for a mixture of clear and decayed eucalyptus wood. Aust For. 66:193–196. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2003.10674911
38.
ZobelBJ, JettJJ.1995. Genetics of wood production. Springer Series in wood science. New York, NY, USA: Springer. p. 338.
