The aim of this study was to provide information on the anatomical characteristics of carbonized wood of Prosopis alba and also test the potential of near-infrared in discrimination of wood and charcoal from natural or planted forest. The samples from four different sites were carbonized at 450°C in muffle furnace, both wood and charcoal anatomical qualitative and quantitative features were analysed and measured, and infrared analyses were performed. The qualitative characteristics of the wood anatomy remained in charcoal and the vessel diameter was the only quantitative feature with a statistically significant difference between them, hence the anatomical aspects were insufficient to distinguish between sites. Near-infrared spectroscopy with multivariate statistics showed good results in segregating the samples from planted forest from those of natural forests by using partial least square regression both in wood and carbonized material, indicating a good potential use in distinguishing material from different origins.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2012. E1655 – Standard practices for infrared multivariate, quantitative analysis. 29p.
3.
AndreassenK, SolbergS, TveitoOE, LystadSL.2006. Regional differences in climatic responses of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) growth in Norway. For Ecol Manag. 222:211–221. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.029
4.
BraadbaartF, PooleI.2008. Morphological, chemical and physical changes during charcoalification of wood and its relevance to archaeological contexts. J Archaeol Sci. 35(9):2434–2445. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2008.03.016
5.
DavrieuxF, 2010. Near infrared spectroscopy for high-throughput characterization of shea tree (Vitellaria paradoxa) nut fat profiles. J Agric Food Chem. 58(13):7811–7819. doi: 10.1021/jf100409v
6.
de MuñizGIB, CarneiroME, BatistaR, RodriguesF, Zatt SchardosinF, NisgoskiS.2016. Wood and charcoal identification of five species from the miscellaneous group known in Brazil as “angelim” by near-ir and wood anatomy. Mader Cien Tecnol. 18(3):505–522.
7.
de MuñizGIB, CarneiroME, NisgoskiS, RamirezMGL, MagalhãesWLE.2013. SEM and NIR characterization of four forest species charcoal. Wood Sci Technol. 4(47):815–823. doi: 10.1007/s00226-013-0539-6
8.
de MuñizGIB, NisgoskiS, FrançaRF, SchardosinFZ.2012. Comparative anatomy of wood and charcoal of Cedrelinga catenaeformis Ducke and Enterolobium schomburgkii Benth. for identification purposes. Sci Florest. 40(94):291–297.
9.
de MuñizGIB, NisgoskiS, Lomeli-RamirezMG.2010. Wood anatomy and ultrastructure of three species of Prosopis (Leguminosae–Mimosoideae) from dry Parque Chaqueño, Argentina. Mad Bosq. 16(4):21–38. doi: 10.21829/myb.2010.1641158
10.
DownesGM, DrewDM.2008. Climate and growth influences on wood formation and utilization. Southern Forests. 70(2):155–167. doi: 10.2989/SOUTH.FOR.2008.70.2.11.539
11.
GonçalvesTAP, Scheel-YbertR, MarcatiCR.2012. The effect of carbonization on wood structure of Dalbergia violacea, Stryphnodendron polyphyllum, Tapirira guianensis, Vochysia tucanorum, and Pouteria torta from the Brazilian Cerrado. IAWA J. 33(1):73–90. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000081
12.
GonçalvesTAP, Wagner BallarinA, NisgoskiS, Bolzon de MuñizGI.2014. A contribution to the identification of charcoal origin in Brazil: I-anatomical characterization of corymbia and eucalyptus. Mad Cienc Tecnol. 16(3):323–336.
13.
IAWA Committee, 1989. IAWA list of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bullet. 10(3):219–332. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000496
14.
KimN, HannaRB.2006. Morphological characteristics of Quercus variabilis charcoal prepared at different temperatures. Wood Sci Technol. 40(5):392–401. doi: 10.1007/s00226-005-0062-5
15.
LemeCLD, CartwrightC, GassonP.2010. Anatomical changes to the wood of Mimosa ophthalmocentra and Mimosa tenuiflora when charred at different temperatures. IAWA J. 31(3):333–351. doi: 10.1163/22941932-90000027
16.
LennoxSJ, BamfordM.2015. Use of wood anatomy to identify poisonous plants: charcoal of Spirostachys africana. S Afr J Sci. 111(3–4):1–9.
17.
LiuS, LoupC, GrilJ, DumonceaudO, ThibautA, ThibautB.2005. Studies on European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Part 1. Variations of wood color parameters. Ann For Sci. 62(7):625–632. doi: 10.1051/forest:2005063
18.
ManettiMC, CutiniA.2006. Tree-ring growth of Silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) in two stands under different silvicultural systems in central Italy. Dendrochronologia. 23:145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2005.11.002
19.
MederR, KainD, EbdonN, MacdonellP, BrawnerJT.2014. Identifying hybridization in Pinus species using near infrared spectroscopy of foliage. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 22:337–345. doi: 10.1255/jnirs.1127
20.
MiinaJ.2000. Dependence of tree-ring, earlywood and latewood indices of Scots pine and Norway spruce on climatic factors in eastern Finland. Ecol Modell. 132:259–273. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00296-9
21.
NisgoskiS, de MuñizGIB, MorroneSR, SchardosinFZ, FrançaRF.2015. NIR and anatomy of wood and charcoal from Moraceae and Euphorbiaceae species. Brazil J Wood Sci. 6(3):183–190.
22.
NisgoskiS, GonçalvesTAP, de OliveiraNM, BittencourtSC, LimaGS, de MuñizGIB.2018. Influence of toposequence position of Stryphnodendron adstringens trees on discrimination of samples based on spectroscopy. Ciênc Mad. 9(2):112–122.
23.
NisgoskiS, SchardosinFZ, BatistaFRR, de MuñizGIB, CarneiroME.2016. Potential use of NIR spectroscopy to identify Cryptomeria japonica varieties from southern Brazil. Wood Sci Technol. 50(1):71–80. doi: 10.1007/s00226-015-0783-z
24.
PasquiniC.2018. Near infrared spectroscopy: a mature analytical technique with new perspectives – a review. Anal Chim Acta. 1026:8–36. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.04.004
25.
PedrosoLLA, 2018. Current and future demands for biomass and renewable energy in Brazil and worldwide. Brazil J Develop. 4(5):1980–1996.
26.
PereiraBLC, CarvalhoAMML, OliveiraAC, SantosLC, CarneiroADCO, de MagalhaesMA.2016. Effect of wood carbonization in the anatomical structure and density of charcoal from Eucalyptus. Ciênc Florest. 26(2):545–557. doi: 10.5902/1980509822755
27.
PereiraJCD, LimaPCF.2002. Wood quality comparison of six species of algarobeira for energy production. Bolet Pesq Florest. 45:99–106.
28.
RamalhoFMG, HeinPRG, AndradeJM, NapoliA.2017. Potential of near-infrared spectroscopy for distinguishing charcoal produced from planted and native wood for energy purpose. Energy Fuels. 31:1593–1599. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02446
29.
RanaR, MullerG, NaumannA, PolleA.2008. FTIR spectroscopy in combination with principal component analysis or cluster analysis as a tool to distinguish beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees grown at different sites. Holzforschung. 62(5):530–538. doi: 10.1515/HF.2008.104
30.
SandakA, SandakJ, NegriM.2011. Relationship between near-infrared (NIR) spectra and geographic provenance of timber. Wood Sci Technol. 45(1):35–48. doi: 10.1007/s00226-010-0313-y
31.
Scheel-YbertR.2016. Charcoal collections of the world. IAWA J. 37(3):489–505. doi: 10.1163/22941932-20160148
32.
SchwanningerM, RodriguesJC, FacklerK.2011. A review of band assignments in near infrared spectra of wood and wood components. J Near Infrared Spectrosc. 19(5):287–308. doi: 10.1255/jnirs.955
33.
Théry-ParisotI, DufraisseA, ChzrazvzezJ, HenryA, Paradis-GrenouilletS.2011. Charcoal analysis and wood diameter: inductive and deductive methodological approaches for the study of firewood collecting practices. Sagvntvm Extra. 11:31–32.
34.
TsuchikawaS, KoboriH.2015. A review of recent application of near infrared spectroscopy to wood science and technology. J Wood Sci. 61(3):213–220. doi: 10.1007/s10086-015-1467-x
