This study is focused on the fire and shock resistance of wooden structures. Fire resistance was investigated through testing the fire resistance duration and charring rate at different positions of the wooden structure. Shock resistance was studied based on the peak load changes and shear capacity of the wooden structure. Finally, optimization strategies were proposed for improving the performance of the wooden structure of buildings.
BailisR, DrigoR, GhilardiA, MaseraO.2015. The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Nat Clim Change. 5:266–272. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2491
2.
BarberD, GerardR.2015. Summary of the fire protection foundation report – fire safety challenges of tall wood buildings. Fire Sci Rev. 4:1–15. doi: 10.1186/s40038-015-0009-3
3.
BarottoAJ, MonteolivaS, GyengeJ, MartinezmeierA, FernandezME.2018. Functional relationships between wood structure and vulnerability to xylem cavitation in races of Eucalyptus globulus differing in wood density. Tree Physiol. 38:243–251. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx138
4.
ChangPG, JeonBH.2014. The usage of traditional roof frame and fire prevention design in the Deajojeon Complex reconstruction in Changdeokgung during the period from 1917 to 1921. J Archit Instit Korea Planning Design. 30:153–164. doi: 10.5659/JAIK_PD.2014.30.5.153
5.
DârmonR, SuciuM.2018. Smoke ventilation strategy for a timber structure building. Proc Manufact. 22:249–255. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.038
6.
GiurianiE, MariniA.2008. Wooden roof box structure for the anti-seismic strengthening of historic buildings. Int J Archit Herit. 2:226–246. doi: 10.1080/15583050802063733
7.
HanX, ZhangQ, YinY, PuJ.2017. Fire retardancy of graphene oxide/wood composite (GOW) prepared by a vacuum-pulse dipping technique. Holzforschung.
8.
IchikawaY, SaekiE, WadaA.2010. Joint structure for antiseismic reinforcement. US, US7784226.
9.
IdoH, KatoH, NagaoH, HaradaM, IkamiY, MatsumuraY, MatsudaY, SaitoS.2017. Grades and mechanical properties of dimension lumber for wood frame construction obtained from large-diameter Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) logs. Mokuzai Gakkaishi. 63:282–290. doi: 10.2488/jwrs.63.282
10.
KamiyaT, KotaniT, SanoY, TomitaR, HiramitsuA.2018. Influence of human load on floor vibration measurement in wood structure house. Aij J Tech Design. 24:693–696. doi: 10.3130/aijt.24.693
11.
LiJ, YuH, SunQ, LiuY, CuiY, LuY.2010. Growth of TiO2 coating on wood surface using controlled hydrothermal method at low temperatures. Appl Surface Sci. 256:5046–5050. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.053
12.
ÖstmanBAL.2017. Fire performance of wood products and timber structures. Int Wood Prod J.8:1–2. doi: 10.1080/20426445.2017.1328816
13.
QinS, YangN.2018. Strength degradation and service life prediction of timber in ancient Tibetan building. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 76:731–747. doi: 10.1007/s00107-017-1211-x
14.
RababehS, QablanHA, Abu-KhafajahS, El-MashalehM.2014. Structural utilization of wooden beams as anti-seismic and stabilising techniques in stone masonry in Qasr el-Bint, Petra, Jordan. Constr Build Mater. 54:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.018
15.
TriantafillouTC.1998. Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete beams using epoxy-bonded FRP composites. Aci Struct J. 95.
16.
WangJ, YangQ.2014. Numerical simulation of damage identification for tibetan ancient timber structure. J Vibrat Measurem Diagn. 34:160–167.
17.
WangYL.2011. Research on the revival application of wooden building with the properties of anti-seismic energy-saving and environment protection. Adv Mater Res. 255–260:1551–1557. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.255-260.1551
