The study of degradation and growth patterns of fungi in modified wood may increase the understanding of their mode of action and may lead to more accurate service-life predictions. The aim of this paper was to study the degradation and growth patterns of brown rot fungi in modified wood and to measure moisture content (MC), structural integrity and the acetyl content by frequent monitoring over 300 days. Mass loss (ML) in the modified wood materials increased slowly up to 3% for 50–100 days after which it flattened out and remained constant during the remainder of the test. Structural integrity and acetyl content were maintained in the modified wood materials and MC was lower compared to untreated wood throughout the decay test. ML results of untreated wood indicate that fungi in solid wood go through distinct phases; the degradation patterns in the modified wood materials were more difficult to interpret.
AlfredsenG, PilgårdA.2014. Postia placenta decay of acetic anhydride modified wood – effect of leaching. Wood Mater Sci Eng. 9:162–169. doi: 10.1080/17480272.2014.887776
2.
AlfredsenG, RingmanR, PilgårdA, FossdalCG.2014. New insight regarding mode of action of brown rot decay of modified wood based on DNA and gene expression studies. Int Wood Prod J. 6(1):2008–2013.
3.
ArantesV, JellisonJ, GoodellB.2012. Peculiarities of brown-rot fungi and biochemical Fenton reaction with regard to their potential as a model for bioprocessing biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 94:323–338. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-3954-y
4.
AroN, PakulaT, PenttilaM.2005. Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 29:719–739. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.006
5.
ArquizaJMRA, HunterJ.2014. The use of real-time PCR to study Penicillium chrysogenum growth kinetics on solid food at different water activities. Int J Food Microbiol. 187:50–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.06.002
6.
AWPA E10. 1991. American wood-preservers’ association standard E10-91. Standard method for testing wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block cultures.
7.
BaranyiJ, RobertsTA.2000. Principles and application of predictive modeling of the effects of preservative factors on microorganisms. In: LundBM, Baird-ParkerTC, GouldGW, editors. The microbiological safety and quality of food. Gaithersburg (MD): Aspen Publishers; p. 342–358.
8.
BraveryAF.1979. A miniaturised wood-block test for the rapid evaluation of wood preservative fungicides. In: Screening techniques for potential wood preservative chemicals. Proceedings of a special seminar held in association with the 10th annual meeting of the IRG, Peebles 1978. Swedish Wood Preservation Institute Report No. 136. Stockholm.
9.
BrischkeC, WelzbacherCR, HuckfeldtT.2008. Influence of fungal decay by different basidiomycetes on the structural integrity of Norway spruce wood. Holz Roh- Werkst. 66:433–438. doi: 10.1007/s00107-008-0257-1
10.
BrischkeC, WelzbacherCR, RappAO.2006. Detection of fungal decay by high-energy multiple impact (HEMI) testing. Holzforschung. 60:217–222. doi: 10.1515/HF.2006.036
11.
BrischkeC, ZimmerK, UlvcronaT, BollmusS, WelzbacherCR, ThomsenO.2012. The impact of various modification processes on the structural integrity of wood. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Wood Modification, Ljubliana, Slovenia.
12.
CurlingSF, ClausenCA, WinandyJE.2002. Relationships between mechanical properties, weight loss and chemical composition of wood during incipient brown-rot decay. For Prod J. 52:34–39.
13.
EatonRA, HaleMDC.1993. Decay, pests and protection. Cambridge: Chapman & Hall.
14.
EN 84. 1996. Wood preservatives – accelerated ageing of treated wood prior to biological testing. Leaching procedure. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium.
15.
EN 113. 1996. Wood preservatives – test method for determining the protective effectiveness against wood destroying basidiomycetes: determination of toxic values. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium. 31 p.
FacklerK, StevanicJS, TersT, HinterstoisserB, SchwanningerM, SalménL.2010. Localisation and characterisation of incipient brown-rot decay within spruce wood cell walls using FT-IR imaging microscopy. Enzyme Microb Technol. 47:257–267. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.07.009
18.
FentonHJH.1894. Oxidation of tartaric acid in the presence of iron. J Chem Soc Trans. 65:899–910. doi: 10.1039/CT8946500899
19.
FuhrMJ, SchubertM, SchwarzeFWMR, HerrmannHJ.2011. Modelling the hyphal growth of the wood-decay fungus Physisporinus vitreus. Fungal Biol. 115:919–932. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2011.06.017
20.
GoldsteinIS.1960. Impregnating solutions and methods. GB Patent 846,680.
21.
GoodellB, JellisonJ, LiuJ, DanielG, PaszczynskiA, FeketeF, KrishnamurthyS, JunL, XuG.1997. Low molecular weight chelators and phenolic compounds isolated from wood decay fungi and their role in the fungal biodegradation of wood. J Biotechnol. 53:133–162. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1656(97)01681-7
22.
HillC.2006. Wood modification: chemical, thermal and other processes. Stevens C.V., editor. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
23.
HillCAS.2009. Why does acetylation protect wood from microbiological attack?Wood Mater Sci Eng. 4:37–45. doi: 10.1080/17480270903249409
24.
HillCAS, ForsterSC, FarahaniMRM, HaleMDC, OrmondroydGA, WilliamsGR.2005. An investigation of cell wall micropore blocking as a possible mechanism for the decay resistance of anhydride modified wood. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 55:69–76. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2004.07.003
25.
HillCAS, PapadopoulosAN, PayneD.2004. Chemical modification employed as a means of probing the cell-wall micropore of pine sapwood. Wood Sci Technol. 37:475–488. doi: 10.1007/s00226-003-0193-5
26.
ISO 5223. 1996. Test sieves for cereals. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
27.
LandeS, WestinM, SchneiderM.2004. Properties of furfurylated wood. Scand J For Res. 19:22–30. doi: 10.1080/0282758041001915
28.
Larsson BrelidP.1998. Acetylation of solid wood – wood properties and process development [PhD thesis]. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Forest products and Chemical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology. ISBN 91.7197-666-3.
29.
Larsson BrelidP, SimonsonR, BergmanÖ, NilssonT.2000. Resistance of acetylated wood to biological degradation. Holz Roh- Werkst. 58:331–337. doi: 10.1007/s001070050439
30.
LenaG, D'AnnibaleA, SermanniG.1994. Influence of the age and growth conditions on the mycelial chitin content of Lentinus edodes. J Basic Microbiol. 34:11–16. doi: 10.1002/jobm.3620340103
31.
MadiganMT, MartinkoJM, ParkerJ.2000. Brock biology of microorganisms. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall.
32.
MaedaK, OhtaM, MomoharaI.2015. Relationship between the mass profile and the strength property profile of decayed wood. Wood Sci Technol. 49:331–344. doi: 10.1007/s00226-014-0696-2
33.
MånssonP, SamuelssonB.1981. Quantitative determination of O-acetyl and other O-acyl groups in cellulosic material. Svensk Papperstidning. 84:R15–R24.
34.
MartinezD, ChallacombeJ, MorgensternI, HibbettD, SchmollM, KubicekCP, FerreiraP, Ruiz-DuenasFJ, MartinezAT, KerstenP, 2009. Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:1954–1959. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809575106
35.
MeyerL, BrischkeC.2015. Fungal decay at different moisture levels of selected European-grown wood species. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 103:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.04.009
36.
MohebbyB, MaiC, MilitzH.2003. Soft rot decay in acetylated wood: Microcalorimetry and Ergosterol assay in decayed wood. 1st European Conference on Wood Modification, Ghent, Belgium.
37.
NordstiernaL, LandeS, WestinM, KarlssonO, FuróI.2008. Towards novel wood-based materials: chemical bonds between lignin-like model molecules and poly(furfuryl alcohol) studied by NMR. Holzforschung. 62:709–713. doi: 10.1515/HF.2008.110
38.
PapadopoulosAN, HillCAS.2002. The biological effectiveness of wood modified with linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides against Coniophora puteana. Holz Roh- Werkst. 60:329–332. doi: 10.1007/s00107-002-0327-8
39.
PapadopoulosAN, HillCAS.2003. The sorption of water vapour by anhydride modified softwood. Wood Sci Technol. 37:221–231. doi: 10.1007/s00226-003-0192-6
40.
PilgårdA, AlfredsenG, FossdalCG, LongIICJ.2012. The effects of acetylation on the growth of Postia placenta over 36 weeks. Proceedings IRG Annual Meeting, IRG/WP 12-40589. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
41.
RappAO, BrischkeC, WelzbacherCR.2006. Interrelationship between the severity of heat treatments and sieve fractions after impact ball milling: a mechanical test for quality control of thermally modified wood. Holzforschung. 60:64–70. doi: 10.1515/HF.2006.012
42.
RappAO, BrischkeC, WelzbacherCR, JazayeriL.2008. Increased resistance of thermally modified Norway spruce timber (TMT) against brown rot decay by oligoporus placenta – a study on the mode of protective action. Wood Res. 53:13–26.
43.
RingmanR, PilgårdA, RichterK.2015. In vitro oxidative and enzymatic degradation of modified wood. Int Wood Prod J. 2:1–6.
44.
RolfeMD, RiceCJ, LucchiniS, PinC, ThompsonA, CameronADS, AlstonM, StringerMF, BettsRP, BaranyiJ, 2012. Lag phase is a distinct growth phase that prepares bacteria for exponential growth and involves transient metal accumulation. J Bacteriol. 194:686–701. doi: 10.1128/JB.06112-11
45.
RowellRM, SimonsonR, HessS, PlackettDV, CronshawD, DunninghamE.1994. Acetyl distribution in acetylated whole wood and reactivity of isolated wood cell wall components to acetic anhydride. Wood Fiber Sci. 26:11–18.
46.
SchmidtO.2006. Wood and tree fungi. Biology, damage, protection and use. Berlin: Springer.
47.
SchmöllerlB, AlfredsenG, FossdalCG, WestinM, SteitsA.2011. Molecular investigation of Postia placenta growing in modified wood. Document No. IRG/WP 11-10756. The International Research Group on Wood Protection. Stockholm, Sweden.
48.
ThybringEE.2013. The decay resistance of modified wood influenced by moisture exclusion and swelling reduction. Int Biodeter Biodegrad. 82:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.004
49.
ThygesenL, ElderT.2009. Moisture in untreated, acetylated, and furfurylated Norway spruce monitored during drying below fiber saturation using time domain NMR. Wood Fiber Sci. 41:194–200.
50.
ThygesenLG, Tang EngelundE, HoffmeyerP, EngelundET.2010. Water sorption in wood and modified wood at high values of relative humidity. Part I: results for untreated, acetylated, and furfurylated Norway spruce. Holzforschung. 64:315–323. doi: 10.1515/hf.2010.044
51.
VermaP, DyckmansJ, MilitzH, MaiC.2008. Determination of fungal activity in modified wood by means of micro-calorimetry and determination of total esterase activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 80:125–133. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1525-z
52.
VermaP, JungaU, MilitzH, MaiC.2009. Protection mechanisms of DMDHEU treated wood against white and brown rot fungi. Holzforschung. 63:371–378. doi: 10.1515/HF.2009.051
53.
WilcoxWW.1978. Review of literature on the effects of early stages of decay on wood strength. Wood Fiber. 9:252–257.
54.
WinandyJE, MorrellJJ.1993. Relationship between incipient decay, strength and chemical composition in Douglas-fir heartwood. Wood Fiber. 25:278–288.
55.
WitomskiP, OlekW, BonarskiJT.2016. Changes in strength of Scots pine wood (Pinus silvestris L.) decayed by brown rot (Coniophora puteana) and white rot (Trametes versicolor). Constr Build Mater. 102:162–166. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.109
