Environmental machining was investigated using coconut oil and minimal quantity lubrication (MQL) in the turning of AISI 316 stainless steel. The turning parameters and MQL flow rate were optimized using ANOM and ANOVA in multi-response analysis to obtain the best hardness and minimum surface roughness. The feed, speed, depth of cut, and MQL flow rate were used as input parameters. It was observed that minimum surface roughness (Ra: 1.12 μm and Rz: 6.37 μm) at cutting speed of 120 m/min, feed rate between 0.25 and 0.3 mm/rev, the depth of cut between 1.0 and 1.5 mm and a flow rate of 90 ml/h. The high hardness of 230 μHv at machined surface and machining affected zone (MAZ) was observed to a depth of 1.075 mm. The coconut oil was shown to be an ecofriendly lubricant for machining difficult-to-cut materials like stainless steel and keeping good surface integrity.
NavesVTG, Da SilvaMB, Da SilvaFJ.Evaluation of the effect of application of cutting fluid at high pressure on tool wear during turning operation of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel. Wear. 2013;302:1201–1208.
2.
VasumathyD, MeenaA, DuraiselvamM.Experimental study on evaluating the effect of micro textured tools in turning AISI316 austenitic stainless steel. Procedia Eng. 2017;184:50–57.
3.
KadiRV, DundurST.Optimization of dry turning parameters on surface roughness and hardness of austenitic stainless steel (AISI316) by Taguchi technique. J Eng Fundamentals. 2015;2(2):30–41.
4.
DilbagSinghP, VenkateswaraR.A surface roughness prediction model for hard turning process. Int. J Adv Manuf Technol. 2007;32:1115–1124.
5.
KaladharM, VenkataSubbaiahK, ShrinivasRaoC.Determination of optimum process parameters during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel using Taguchi method and ANOVA. Int J Lean Thinking. 2012;2:1–19.
6.
AcayabaGMA, de EscalonaPM.Prediction of surface roughness in low speed turning of AISI316 austenitic stainless steel. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol. 2015;11:62–67.
7.
CiftciI.Machining of austenitic stainless steels using CVD multi-layer coated cemented carbide tools. Tribol Int. 2006;39:565–569.
8.
AsiltürkI, AkkusH.Determining the effect of cutting parameters on surface roughness in hard turning using the Taguchi method. Measurement. 2011;44:1697–1704.
9.
WaghSS, KulkarniAP, SargadeVG.Machinability studies of austenitic stainless steel (AISI 304) using PVD cathodic arc evaporation (CAE) system deposited AlCrN/ TiAlN coated carbide inserts. Procedia Eng. 2013;64:907–914.
10.
MarudaR, KrolczykG, NieslonyP.The influence of the cooling conditions on the cutting tool wear and the chip formation mechanism. J Manuf Process. 2016;24:107–115.
11.
KhanMMA, MithuMAH, DharNR.Effect of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil based cutting fluid. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209:5573–5583.
12.
ShashidharaYM, JayaramSR.Vegetable oils as a potential cutting fluid – an evolution. Tribol Int. 2010;43:1073–1081.
13.
AstakhovV, JokschS.Metalworking fluids (MWFs) for cutting and grinding: fundamentals and recent advances. 1st ed. Cambridge: Woodhead; 2012. (Woodhead Publishing Series in Metals and Surface Engineering)
14.
BragaDU, DinizAE, MirandaGW, . Using a minimum quantity of lubricant (MQL) and diamond coated tool in the drilling of aluminium–silicon alloys. J Mater Process Technol. 2002;122(1):127–138.
15.
LiuM, LiC, ZhangY, . Cryogenic minimum quantity lubrication machining: from mechanism to application. Front Mech Eng. 2021;16(4):649–697.
16.
VaradharajanAS, PhilipPK, RamamoorthyB. Investigations on hard turning with minimal pulsed jet of cutting fluid. Proceedings of the International Seminar on Manufacturing Technology Beyond 2000; November 1999; Bangalore, India. p. 173–179.
17.
SinghG, SinghS, SinghM, . Experimental investigations of vegetable & mineral oil performance during machining of EN-31 steel with minimum quantity. Lubric J Cleaner Prod. 2013;66:619–623.
18.
AlvesSM, de OliveiraJFG.Development of new cutting fluid for grinding process adjusting mechanical performance and environmental impact. J Mater Process Technol. 2006;179:185–189.
19.
LawalSA, ChoudhuryIA, NukmanY.Application of vegetable oil-based metalworking fluids in machining ferrous metals – a review. Int J Machine Tools Manuf. 2012;52:1–12.
20.
ChinchanikarS, ChoudhurySK.Machining of hardened steel-experimental investigations, performance modeling and cooling techniques: a review. Int J Machine Tools Manuf. 2015;89:95–109.
21.
ChanC, LeeW, WangH.Enhancement of surface finish using water-miscible nano-cutting fluid in ultra-precision turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2013;73:62–70.
22.
PalA, ChathaSS, SidhuHS.Experimental investigation on the performance of MQL drilling of AISI 321 stainless steel using nano-graphene enhanced vegetable-oil-based cutting fluid. Tribol Int. 2020;151:106508.
23.
SaleemMQ, MehmoodA.Eco-friendly precision turning of superalloy Inconel 718 using MQL based vegetable oils: tool wear and surface integrity evaluation. J Manuf Process. 2022;73:112–127.
24.
RevuruRS, ZhangJZ, PosinasettiNR.Comparative performance studies of turning 4140 steel with TiC/TiCN/TiN-coated carbide inserts using MQL, flooding with vegetable cutting fluids, and dry machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2020;108:381–391.
25.
PereiraO, Martín-AlfonsoJE, RodríguezA, . Sustainability analysis of lubricant oils for minimum quantity lubrication based on their tribo-rheological performance. J Cleaner Prod. 2017;164:1419–1429. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.078.
26.
WickramasingheKC, SasaharaH, UsuiM.Performance evaluation of a sustainable metal working fluid applied to machine Inconel 718 and AISI 304 with minimum quantity lubrication. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf. 2021;15(4):JAMDSM0046.
27.
KazeemRA, FadareDA, IkumapayiOM, etal. Advances in the application of vegetable-oil-based cutting fluids to sustainable machining operations—a review. Lubricants. 2002; 10(69):1–43.
28.
SharmaJ, SidhuBS.Investigation of effects of dry and near dry machining on AISI D2 steel using vegetable oil. J Clean Prod. 2014;66:619–623.
29.
SivaiahP, ChakradharD.Multi performance characteristics optimization in cryogenic turning of 17-4 PH stainless steel using Taguchi coupled grey relational analysis turning of 17-4 PH stainless steel using Taguchi coupled grey. Adv Mater Process Technol. 2018;4(3):431–447.
30.
FernandoWLR, SarmilanN, WickramasingheKC, . Experimental investigation of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) of coconut oil based metal working fluid. Mater Today Proc. 2020;23:23–26.
31.
NileshCG, DattarayaDP.The emergence of MQL with vegetable oil as a green manufacturing technique: a review. SAMRIDDHI. 2022; 14(1):66–71.
32.
SivaiahP.Experimental investigation and modelling of MQL assisted turning process during machining of 15-5 PH stainless steel using response surface methodology. Cham: Springer Nature; 2019.
33.
KhanMMA, MithuMAH, DharNR.Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209:5573–5583.
34.
SarıkayaM, GüllüA.Taguchi design and response surface methodology based analysis of machining parameters in CNC turning under MQL. J Cleaner Prod. 2014;65:604–616.
LalwaniDI, MehtaNK, JainPK.Experimental investigations of cutting parameters influence on cutting forces and surface roughness in finish hard turning of MDN250 steel. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;206:167–179.
37.
Vamsi KrishnaP, SrikantRR, Nageswara RaoD.Experimental investigation on the performance of nanoboric acid suspensions in SAE-40 and coconut oil during turning of AISI 1040 steel. Int J Machine Tools Manuf. 2010;50:911–916.
38.
SodavadiaKP, MakwanaAH.Experimental investigation on the performance of coconut oil based nano fluid as lubricants during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Int J Adv Mech Eng. 2014;4:55–60.
39.
KorkutI, KasapM, CiftciI, . Determination of optimum cutting parameters during machining of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Des. 2004;25:303–305.
40.
CebronM, KoselF, KopacJ.Effect of cutting on surface hardness and residual stresses for 12Mn austenitic steel. J Achievements Mater Manuf Eng. 2012;55:80–89.
41.
SasaharaH.The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0.45%C steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2005;45:131–136.
42.
LiuCR, BarashMM.The mechanical state of the sub layer of a surface generated by chip-removal process part 1: cutting with a sharp tool. Trans ASME J Eng Ind. 1976; 98(4):1192–1201.
43.
PawadeRS, JoshiSS, BrahmankarPK.Effect of machining parameters and cutting edge geometry on surface integrity of high-speed turned Inconel 718. Int J Machine Tools Manuf. 2008;48:15–28.
44.
BoothroydG, KnightWA.Fundamentals of machining and machine tools. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis; 2006.
45.
HaiderJ, HashmiMSJ.Health and environmental impacts metal machining processes, book series. In: HashmiS, BatalhaGF, Van TyneCJ, YilbasB, editors. Comprehensive materials processing. Oxford: Elsevier; 2014. p. 7–33.
