Fibre-reinforced polymer composites exhibit excellent mechanical and tribological properties. Due to these reasons, they are used in many engineering applications such as transmission and brake systems. In the present study, the wear mechanism of flax and basalt fibre-reinforced phenolic composites was studied using a pin-on-disc wear tester. The sliding conditions such as sliding velocity and normal force varied from 0.1 to 0.5 m/s and 9.81 to 49.04 N, respectively. The wear map of worn-out specimens were analysed using wear mechanism map developed using Fuzzy Clustering Method. Scanning Electron microscopy photographs were examined and wear map was correlated. Different wear mechanisms that dominated a particular wear regime were discussed in this paper.
KeskinA. Investigation of using natural zeolite in brake pad. Sci Res Essays. 2011;23:4893–4904.
5.
EL-TayebNSM, LiewKW. On the dry and wet sliding performance of potentially new frictional brake pad materials for automotive industry. Wear2008;266:275–287.
6.
LuY. A combinatorial approach for automotive friction materials: effects of ingredients on friction performance. Compos Sci Technol. 2006;66:591–598.10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.032
7.
LuY. A combinatorial approach for automotive friction materials: combined effects of ingredients on friction performance. Polym Compos. 2002;23:814–823.10.1002/(ISSN)1548-0569
8.
YunR, FilipP, LuY. Performance and evaluation of ecofriendly brake friction materials. Tribol Int. 2010;43:2010–2019.10.1016/j.triboint.2010.05.001
9.
GoriparthiBK, SumanKNS, RaoNM. Effect of fiber surface treatments on mechanical and abrasive wear performance of polylactide/jute composites. Composites2012;43:1800–1808.10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.05.007
10.
KumarM, BijweJ. Role of different metallic fillers in non-asbestos organic (NAO) friction composites for controlling sensitivity of coefficient of friction to load and speed. Tribol Int. 2012;43:965–974.
11.
DaoudA, EL-khairMTA. Wear and friction behavior of sand cast brake rotor made of A359-20 vol%SiC particle composites sliding against automobile friction material. Tribol Int. 2010;43:544–553.10.1016/j.triboint.2009.09.003
12.
UyyuruRK, SurappaMK, BrusethaugS. Effect of reinforcement volume fraction and size distribution on the tribological behavior of Al-composite/brake pad tribo-couple. Wear. 2006;260:1248–1255.10.1016/j.wear.2005.08.011
13.
RavikiranA. Effect of pin specimen contact length in the sliding direction on tribological results of pin-on-disc tests. Tribol Lett. 1998;4:49–58.10.1023/A:1019122314648
14.
SchwartzCJ, BahadurS. The role of filler deformability, filler–polymer bonding, and counterface material on the tribological behavior of polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Wear. 2001;251:1532–1540.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00799-2
15.
ZhangMQ, RongMZ, YuSL. Effect of particle surface treatment on the tribological performance of epoxy based nanocomposites. Wear. 2002;253:126–136.
16.
MyshkinN, PetrokovetsM, KovalevAV. Tribology of polymers: adhesion, friction, wear, and mass-transfer. Tribol Int. 2005;38:910–921.10.1016/j.triboint.2005.07.016
SumerM, UnalH, MimarogluA. Evaluation of tribological behaviour of PEEK and glass fibre reinforced PEEK composite under dry sliding and water lubricated conditions. Wear. 2008;265:1061–1065.10.1016/j.wear.2008.02.008
19.
DavimJP, CardosoR. Effect of the reinforcement (carbon or glass fibres) on friction and wear behaviour of the PEEK against steel surface at long dry sliding. Wear. 2009;266:795–799.10.1016/j.wear.2008.11.003
20.
ChauhanSR, KumarA, SinghI. Sliding friction and wear behaviour of vinylester and its composites under dry and water lubricated sliding conditions. Mater Des. 2010;31:2745–2751.10.1016/j.matdes.2010.01.020
21.
QuintelierJ, De BaetsP, SamynP. On the SEM features of glass–polyester composite system subjected to dry sliding wear. Wear. 2006;261:703–714.10.1016/j.wear.2006.01.006
22.
El-TayebNSM. Abrasive wear performance of untreated SCF reinforced polymer composite. J Mater Process Technol. 2008;206:305–314.10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.12.028
23.
ErikssonM, BergmanF, JacobsonS. On the nature of tribological contact in automotive brakes. Wear. 2002;252:26–36.10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00849-3
24.
KimSJ, JangH. Friction and wear of friction materials containing two different phenolic resins reinforced with aramid pulp. Tribol Int. 2000;33:477–484.
25.
Mohamad RaffiN, SrinivasanV. A study on wear behavior of γ-UHMWPE sliding against 316L stainless steel counter face. Wear. 2013;306:22–26.10.1016/j.wear.2013.06.023
26.
SrinivasanV, AsaithambiB, GanesanG. Wear mechanism of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composites under dry sliding using fuzzy clustering technique. J Reinf Plast Compos. 2009;28:1349–1358.10.1177/0731684408089489
