Differential vergence movements in reading Chinese and English: Greater fixation-initial binocular disparity is advantageous in reading the denser orthography
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2018
Differential vergence movements in reading Chinese and English: Greater fixation-initial binocular disparity is advantageous in reading the denser orthography
We explore two aspects of exovergence: we test whether smaller binocular fixation disparities accompany the shorter saccades and longer fixations observed in reading Chinese, and we test whether potentially advantageous psychophysical effects of exovergence transfer to text reading. We report differential exovergence in reading Chinese and English: Chinese readers begin fixations with more binocular disparity, but end fixations with a disparity closely similar to that of the English readers. We conclude that greater fixation-initial binocular disparity can be adaptive in the reading of visually and cognitively denser text.
BlytheH. I.LiversedgeS. P.JosephH. S.WhiteS. J.FindlayJ. M.RaynerK. (2006). The binocular coordination of eye movements during reading in children and adults. Vision Research, 46, 3898–3908.
4.
ChenY.-P.AllportD. A.MarshallJ. C. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 49, 1024–1043.
5.
ClarkB. (1935). The effect of binocular imbalance on the behavior of the eyes during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 530–538.
6.
CornellE. D.MacdougallH. G.PredebonJ.CurthoysI. S. (2003). Errors of binocular fixation are common in normal subjects during natural conditions. Optometry & Vision Science, 80, 764–771.
7.
EngbertR.KlieglR. (2004). Microsaccades keep the eyes’ balance during fixation. Psychological Science, 15, 431–431.
8.
EnrightJ. T. (1998). Monocularly programmed human saccades during vergence changes. Journal of Physiology, 512, 235–258.
9.
ErkelensC. J.CollewijnH. (1985). Motion perception during dichoptic viewing of moving random-dot stereograms. Vision Research, 25, 583–588.
10.
FangF.BoyaciH.KerstenD.MurrayS. O. (2008). Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1. Current Biology, 18, 1707–1712.
11.
FengG.MillerK.ShuH.ZhangH. (2009). Orthography and the development of reading processes: An eye movement study of Chinese and English. Child Development, 80, 720–735.
12.
HelmholtzJ. A. (1910). Treatise on physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover.
13.
HendriksA. W. (1996). Vergence eye movements during fixations in reading. Acta Psychologica, 92, 131–151.
14.
HeringE. (1977). The theory of binocular vision. New York, NY: Plenum.
15.
HolmqvistK.NyströmM.AnderssonR.DewhurstR.JarodzkaH.Van de WeijerJ. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
JaintaS.JaschinskiW. (2010). ‘Trait’ and ‘state’ aspects of fixation disparity during reading. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 3(3), 1–13.
17.
JaintaS.JaschinskiW.WilkinsA. J. (2010). Periodic letter strokes within a word affect fixation disparity during reading. Journal of Vision, 10(13), 1–11.
18.
JonesR. K.LeeD. N. (1981). Why two eyes are better than one: The two views of binocular vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Perfor-mance, 7(1), 30.
19.
JuhaszB. J.LiversedgeS. P.WhiteS. J.RaynerK. (2006). Binocular coordination of the eyes during reading: Word frequency and case alternation affect fixation duration but not fixation disparity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(9), 1614–1625.
20.
KerstenD.MurrayS. O. (2010). Vision: When does looking bigger mean seeing better?Current Biology, 20, R398–R399.
21.
KirkbyJ. A.BlytheH. I.DriegheD.BensonV.LiversedgeS. P. (2013). Investigating eye movement acquisition and analysis technologies as a causal factor in differential prevalence of crossed and uncrossed fixation disparity during reading and dot scanning. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 664–678.
22.
KirkbyJ. A.WebsterL. A.BlytheH. I.LiversedgeS. P. (2008). Binocular coordination during reading and non-reading tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 742–763.
23.
LiversedgeS. P.DriegheD.LiX.YanG.BaiX.HyönäJ. (2016). Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1–20.
24.
LiversedgeS. P.WhiteS. J.FindlayJ. M.RaynerK. (2006). Binocular coordination of eye movements during reading. Vision Research, 46, 2363–2374.
25.
Martinez-CondeS. (2007). Windows on the mind. Scientific American, 297(2), 56–63.
26.
Martinez-CondeS.MacknikS. L.HubelD. H. (2000). Microsaccadic eye movements and firing of single cells in the striate cortex of macaque monkeys. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 251–258.
27.
Martinez-CondeS.MacknikS. L.HubelD. H. (2004). The role of fixational eye movements in visual perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 229–240.
28.
Martinez-CondeS.Otero-MillanJ.MacknikS. L. (2013). The impact of microsaccades on vision: Towards a unified theory of saccadic function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 83–96.
29.
MaysL. (1998). Has Hering been hooked?Nature Medicine, 4, 889–890.
30.
MurrayS. O.BoyaciH.KerstenD. (2006). The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 9, 429–434.
31.
NuthmannA.KlieglR. (2009). An examination of binocular reading fixations based on sentence corpus data. Journal of Vision, 9(5), Article 31.
32.
ObregónM.ShillcockR. (2012). Foveational complexity in single word identification: Contralateral visual pathways are advantaged over ipsilateral pathways. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3279–3283.
33.
PelliD. G.BurnsC. W.FarellB.Moore-PageD. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46, 4646–4674.
34.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD., & Core Team, R. (2012). Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R Package Version 3.1-105.
35.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.
36.
RaynerK.PollatsekA.AshbyJ.CliftonC.Jr. (2012). Psychology of reading. New York, NY; London, England: Psychology Press.
37.
SchmidtW. A. (1917). An experimental study in the psychology of reading (Supplementary educational monographs, Doctoral dissertation). The University of Chicago, IL.
38.
ShillcockR.RobertsM. A. J.KreinerH.ObregónM. (2010). Binocular foveation in reading. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 2184–2203. doi:10.3758/APP.72.8.2184
39.
SimonF.SchulzE.RassowB.HaaseW. (1984). Binocular micromovement recording of human eyes: Methods. Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 221, 293–298.
40.
SpauschusA.MarsdenJ.HallidayD. M.RosenbergJ. R.BrownP. (1999). The origin of ocular microtremor in man. Experimental Brain Research, 126, 556–562.
41.
TaylorE. A. (1966). The fundamental reading skill, as related to eye-movement photography and visual anomalies (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
42.
ThielM.RomanoM. C.KurthsJ.RolfsM.KlieglR. (2008). Generating surrogates from recurrences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366, 545–557.
43.
TylerC. W. (2004). Binocular vision. In TasmanW.JaegerE. A. (Eds.), Duane’s foundations of clinical ophthalmology (Vol. 2, pp. 1–29). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
44.
VernetM.KapoulaZ. (2009). Binocular motor coordination during saccades and fixations while reading: A magnitude and time analysis. Journal of Vision, 9(7), Article 2. doi:10.1167/9.7.2
