The adaptive view of human memory assumes that animates (e.g, rabbit) are remembered better than inanimates (e.g. glass) because animates are ultimately more important for fitness than inanimates. Previous studies provided evidence for this view by showing that animates were recalled or recognized better than inanimates, but they did not assess memory for contextual details (e.g., where animates vs inanimates occurred). In this study, we tested recollection of spatial information (Study 1) and temporal information (Study 2) associated with animate versus inanimate words. The findings showed that the two types of contextual information were remembered better when they were related to animates than to inanimates. These findings provide further evidence for an ultimate explanation of animacy effects.
AlarioF.-X.FerrandL. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531–552.
2.
AslanA.BäumlK. H. T. (2012). Adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of fitness-related information. Cognition, 122, 118–122.
3.
AslanA.JohnT. (2016). The development of adaptive memory: Young children show enhanced retention of animacy-related information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 343–350.
4.
BoninP.BugaiskaA. (2014). “Survivre pour se souvenir.” Une approche novatrice de la mémoire épisodique: La mémoire adaptative [Survive to remember. A new perspective on episodic memory: Adaptive memory]. L’Année Psychologique, 114, 571–610.
5.
BoninP.GelinM.BugaiskaA. (2014). Animates are better remembered than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42, 370–382.
6.
BoninP.GelinM.LarocheB.MéotA.BugaiskaA. (2015). The “how” of animacy effects in episodic memory. Experimental Psychology, 62, 371–384.
7.
BoninP.MéotA.AubertL. F.MalardierN.NiedenthalP. M.Capelle-ToczekM. C. (2003). Normes de concrétude, de valeur d’imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots [Norms of concreteness, imageability, subjective frequency and valence for 866 French words]. L’Année Psychologique, 103, 655–694.
8.
BoninP.PeeremanR.MalardierN.MéotA.ChalardM. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 158–167.
9.
BrewerG. A.MarshR. L.Clark-FoosA.MeeksJ. T. (2010). Noncriterial recollection influences metacognitive monitoring and control processes. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1936–1942.
10.
BröderA.KrügerN.SchütteS. (2011). The survival processing memory effect should generalise to source memory, but it doesn’t. Psychology, 2, 896–901.
11.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CohenJ.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 257–271.
13.
CraikF. I. M.TulvingE. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.
14.
Di GiorgioE.LunghiM.SimionF.VallortigaraG. (2017). Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: The case of self-propulsion. Developmental Science, 20, Article e12394.
15.
DonaldsonW. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275–277.
16.
GardinerJ. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309–313.
17.
GelinM.BugaiskaA.MéotA.BoninP. (2017). Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?Memory, 25, 2–18.
18.
GelmanR.SpelkeE. (1981). The development of thoughts about animate and inanimate objects: Implications for research on social cognition. In FlavellJ. H.RossL. (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 43–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
GoddenD. R.BaddeleyA. D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater. British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325–331.
20.
JersildA. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, 89, 5–82.
MandlerJ. M.McDonoughL. (1998). On developing a knowledge base in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1274–1288.
23.
ManerJ. K.GailliotM. T.DeWallC. N. (2007). Adaptive attentional attunement: Evidence for mating-related perceptual bias. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 28–36.
24.
MeiserT.SattlerC. (2007). Boundaries of the relation between conscious recollection and source memory for perceptual details. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 189–210.
25.
MurnaneK.BayenU. J. (1996). An evaluation of empirical measures of source identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 417–428.
26.
NairneJ. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Evolutionary constraints on remembering. In RossB. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 53, pp. 1–32). Burlington, Ontario, Canada: Academic Press.
27.
NairneJ. S. (2015). Adaptive memory: Novel findings acquired through forward engineering. In LindsayD. S.KelleyC. M.YonelinasA. P.RoedigerH. L. (Eds.), Remembering: Attributions, processes, and control in human memory (pp. 3–14). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
NairneJ. S.CogdillM.LehmanM. (2017). Adaptive memory: Temporal, semantic, and rating-based clustering following survival processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 304–314.
29.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.SmithM. A.GrimaldiP. J.BauernschmidtA. (2010, November). Adaptive memory: Does survival processing enhance memory for source?Paper presented at the 51st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. St. Louis, Missouri, MO.
30.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S. (2016). Adaptive memory: The evolutionary significance of survival processing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 496–511.
31.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.ThompsonS. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176–180.
32.
NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.VanArsdallJ. E.BluntJ. R. (2015). Source-constrained retrieval and survival processing. Memory & Cognition, 43, 1–13.
33.
NairneJ. S.ThompsonS. R.PandeiradaJ. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263–273.
34.
NairneJ. S.VanArsdallJ. E.BluntJ. R. (2012). Adaptive memory: Enhanced location memory after survival processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 495–501.
35.
NairneJ. S.VanArsdallJ. E.PandeiradaJ. N. S.CogdillM.LeBretonJ. M. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy. Psychological Science, 24, 2099–2105.
36.
NairneJ. S. (May, 2016). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a Stone-Age brain. Paper presented at 42nd Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International, Chicago, IL.
37.
NeathI.SurprenantA. M. (2003). Human memory: An introduction to research, data, and theory (2nd edition). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
38.
NewB.PallierC.BrysbaertM.FerrandL. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524.
39.
NewJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 16598–16603.
40.
NewJ.KrasnowM. M.TruxawD.GaulinS. J. C. (2007). Spatial adaptations for plant foraging: Women excel and calories count. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274, 2679–2684.
41.
OriansG. H.HeerwagenJ. H. (1992). Evolved responses to landscapes. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 555–579). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42.
PoppE. Y.SerraM. J. (2016). Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 186–201.
43.
SalthouseT. A.TothJ. P.HancockH. E.WoodardJ. L. (1997). Controlled and automatic forms of memory and attention: Process purity and the uniqueness of age-related influences. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 52, 216–228.
SeamonJ. G.BohnJ. M.CoddingtonI. E.EblingM. C.GrundE. M.HaringC. T., . . . SiddiqueA. H. (2012). Can survival processing enhance story memory? Testing the generalizability of the adaptive memory framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1045–1056.
46.
SnodgrassJ. G.VanderwartM. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
47.
SpectorA.BiedermanI. (1976). Mental set and mental shift revisited. The American Journal of Psychology, 89, 669–679.
TulvingE. (1985). How many memory systems are there?American Psychologist, 40, 385–398.
50.
VanArsdallJ. E.NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.BluntJ. R. (2013). Adaptive memory: Animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages. Experimental Psychology, 60, 172–178.
51.
VanArsdallJ. E.NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.CogdillM. (2015). Adaptive memory: Animacy effects persist in paired-associate learning. Memory, 25, 657–663.
52.
VanArsdallJ. E.NairneJ. S.PandeiradaJ. N. S.CogdillM. (2017). A categorical recall strategy does not explain animacy effects in episodic memory. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 761–771.
53.
WheelerM. A.StussD. T.TulvingE. (1997). Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 331–354.
54.
WilsonS.DarlingS.SykesJ. (2011). Adaptive memory: Fitness relevant stimuli show a memory advantage in a game of pelmanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 781–786.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
