Animate stimuli are better remembered than matched inanimate stimuli in free recall. Three experiments tested the hypothesis that animacy advantages are due to a more efficient use of a categorical retrieval cue. Experiment 1 developed an “embedded list” procedure that was designed to disrupt participants’ ability to perceive category structure at encoding; a strong animacy effect remained. Experiments 2 and 3 employed animate and inanimate word lists consisting of tightly constrained categories (four-footed animals and furniture). Experiment 2 failed to find an animacy advantage when the categorical structure was readily apparent, but the advantage returned in Experiment 3 when the embedded list procedure was employed using the same target words. These results provide strong evidence against an organizational account of the animacy effect, indicating that the animacy effect in episodic memory is probably due to item-specific factors related to animacy.
BarrettH. C. (2005). Adaptations to predators and prey. In BussD. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 200–223). Hoboken, NJ: Wileys & Sons.
2.
BoninP., GelinM., & BugaiskaA. (2014). Animates are better remembered than inanimates: Further evidence from word and picture stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 42, 370–382. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0368-8
3.
BoninP., GelinM., LarocheB., MéotA. & BugaiskaA. (2015). The “how” of animacy effects in episodic memory. Experimental Psychology, 62, 371–384. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000308
4.
CapitaniE., LaiaconaM., MahonB., & CaramazzaA. (2003). What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 213–261. doi:10.1080/02643290244000266
5.
ColtheartM. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 33, 497–505. doi:10.1080/14640748108400805
6.
GelinM., BugaiskaA., MéotA., & BoninP. (2015). Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?Memory. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1117643
7.
GobbiniM. I., GentiliC., RicciardiE., BellucciC., SalviniP., LaschiC., … PietriniP. (2011). Distinct neural systems involved in agency and animacy detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 1911–1920. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21574
8.
HuntR. R., & EinsteinG. O. (1981). Relational and item-specific information in memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 497–514. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90138-9
9.
LandauerT. K., FoltzP. W., & LahamD. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259–284. doi:10.1080/01638539809545028
10.
NairneJ. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Evolutionary constraints on remembering. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 53, pp. 1–32). Burlington, VT: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(10)53001-9
11.
NairneJ. S. (2014). Adaptive memory: Controversies and future directions. In SchwartzB. L., HoweM. L., TogliaM. P., & OtgaarH. (Eds.), What is adaptive about adaptive memory? (pp. 308–321). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
NairneJ. S., ThompsonS. R., & PandeiradaJ. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263–273. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.263
13.
NairneJ. S., VanArsdallJ. E., PandeiradaJ. N. S., CogdillM., & LeBretonJ. M. (2013). Adaptive memory: The mnemonic value of animacy. Psychological Science, 24, 2099–2105. doi:10.1177/0956797613480803
14.
NewJ., CosmidesL., & ToobyJ. (2007). Category-specific attention for animals reflects ancestral priorities, not expertise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 16598–16603. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703913104
15.
OpferJ. E., & GelmanS. A. (2011). Development of the animate-inanimate distinction. In GoswamiU. (Ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 213–238). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
16.
PaivioA., YuilleJ. C., & MadiganS. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. doi:10.1037/h0025327
17.
PoppE. Y., & SerraM. J. (2016). Adaptive memory: Animacy enhances free recall but impairs cued recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 186–201. doi:10.1037/xlm0000174
ReynaV. F., & BrainerdC. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1–75. doi:10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4
20.
RoedigerH. L.III, & McDermottK. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803–814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.4.803
21.
RoenkerD. L., ThompsonC. P., & BrownS. C. (1971). Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 45–48. doi:10.1037/h0031355
22.
RubinD. C., & FriendlyM. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition, 14, 79–94. doi:10.3758/BF03209231
23.
ShaL., HaxbyJ. V., AbdiH., GuntupalliJ. S., OosterhofN. N., HalchenkoY. O., & ConnollyA. C. (2015). The animacy continuum in the human ventral vision pathway. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 665–678. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00733
24.
SimionF., RegolinL., & BulfH. (2008). A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 809–813. doi:10.1073/pnas.0707021105
25.
VanArsdallJ. E., NairneJ. S., PandeiradaJ. N. S., & BluntJ. R. (2013). Adaptive memory: Animacy processing produces mnemonic advantages. Experimental Psychology, 60, 172–178. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000186
26.
VanArsdallJ. E., NairneJ. S., PandeiradaJ. N. S., & CogdillM. (2015). Adaptive memory: Animacy effects persist in paired-associate learning. Memory, 23, 657–663. doi:10.1080/09658211.2014.916304
27.
Van OverscheldeJ. P., RawsonK. A., & DunloskyJ. (2004). Category norms: An updated and expanded version of the Battig and Montague (1969) norms. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 289–335. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2003.10.003
28.
YorzinskiJ. L., PenkunasM. J., PlattM. L., & CossR. C. (2014). Dangerous animals capture and maintain attention in humans. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 534–548. doi:10.1177/147470491401200304
