We examined how whole-word lexical information and knowledge of distributional properties of orthography interact in children’s spelling. High- versus low-frequency words, which included inconsistently spelled segments occurring more or less frequently in the orthography, were used in two experiments: (a) word spelling; (b) lexical priming of pseudoword spelling. Participants were 1st-, 2nd-, and 4th-grade Italian children. Word spelling showed sensitivity to the distributional properties of orthography in all children: accuracy in spelling uncommon transcription segments emerged progressively as a function of word frequency and schooling. Lexical priming effects emerged as a function of age. When related primes contained an uncommon segment, 2nd- and 4th-graders preferred uncommon segments than common ones in spelling target pseudowords, thus inverting the response trend found in the control condition. A smaller but significant effect was present in 1st- graders, who, unlike 2nd- and 4th-graders, still preferred common segments, only slightly increasing the use of uncommon ones. A larger priming effect emerged for high-frequency primes than low-frequency ones. Results indicate that children learning to spell in a transparent orthography are sensitive to the distributional properties of the orthography. However, whole-word lexical representations are also used, with larger effects in more skilled pupils.
AngelelliP.JudicaA.SpinelliD.ZoccolottiP.LuzzattiC. (2004). Characteristics of writing disorders in Italian dyslexic children. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 17, 18–31.
2.
AngelelliP.MarinelliC. V.BuraniC. (2014). The effect of morphology on spelling and reading accuracy: A study on Italian children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1373, article no. 1376.
3.
AngelelliP.MarinelliC. V.LaiaM.NotarnicolaA.CostabileD.JudicaA.LuzzattiC. (2016). DDO-2 Diagnosi dei disturbi ortografici in età evolutiva [Diagnosis of orthographic deficits in childhood]. Trento: Erickson.
4.
AngelelliP.MarinelliC. VZoccolottiP. (2010). Single or dual orthographic representations for reading and spelling? A study of Italian dyslexic–dysgraphic and normal children. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27, 305–333.
5.
AngelelliP.NotarnicolaA.JudicaA.ZoccolottiP.LuzzattiC. (2010). Spelling impairments in Italian dyslexic children: Phenomenological changes in primary schoolCortex, 46, 1299–1311.
6.
AngelelliP.NotarnicolaA.MarcoliniS.BuraniC. (2014). Interaction between the lexical and sublexical spelling procedures: A study on Italian primary school children. In Special issue Ed. PintoM.A.AmicoS. D’ (Special issue Ed.), Lexical access: Studies on monolingual and plurilingual subjects at different developmental stages, Journal of Applied Psycholinguistics, XIV, 2, 2014.
7.
AngelelliP.PutzoluA.IaiaM.MarinelliC. V.GasperiniF.ChilosiA. M.BrizzolaraD. (2016). Spelling impairments in Italian dyslexic children with and without a history of early language delay. Are there any differences?Frontiers in Psychology - Educational Psychology, 7, article no. 527.
8.
BarryC. (1988). Modelling assembled spelling: Convergence of data from normal subjects and “surface” dysgraphia. Cortex, 24, 339–346.
9.
BarryC. (1994). Spelling routes (or roots or rutes). In BrownG. D. A.EllisN. C. (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 27–49). Chichester: John Wiley.
10.
BarryC.de BastianiP. (1997). Lexical priming of nonword spelling in the regular orthography of Italian. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 499–517.
11.
BarryC.SeymourP. H. K. (1988). Lexical priming and sound-to-spelling contingency effects in nonword spelling. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 40, 5–40.
12.
BertinettoP. M.BuraniC.LaudannaA.MarconiL.RattiD.RolandoC.ThorntonA. M. (2005). CoLFIS (Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto) [Corpus and frequency lexicon of written Italian]. Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR. Retrieved from http://www.istc.cnr.it/grouppage/colfisEng
13.
BosseM. L.ValdoisS.TainturierM. J. (2003). Analogy without priming in early spelling development. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 16, 693–716.
14.
BrownG. D. A.LoosemoreR. P. W. (1994). Computational approaches to normal and impaired spelling. In BrownG. D. A.EllisN. C. (Eds.), Handbook of spelling: Theory, process and intervention (pp. 319–335). Chichester: Wiley.
CampbellR. (1983). Writing nonwords to dictation. Brain and Language, 19, 153–178.
17.
CampbellR. (1985). When children write nonwords to dictation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 40, 133–151.
18.
CaravolasM. (2004). Spelling development in alphabetic writing systems: A cross-linguistic perspective. European Psychologist, 9, 3–14.
19.
CaravolasM.BruckM. (1993). The effect of oral and written language input on children’s phonological awareness: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 1–30.
20.
ColomboL.DeguchiC.BoureuxM. (2014). Stress priming and statistical learning in Italian nonword reading: Evidence from children. Reading and Writing, 27, 923–943.
21.
CornoldiC.ColpoG. (1998). Prove di Lettura MT. Guida all’uso [The MT reading test: User manual]. Firenze, IT: Organizzazioni Speciali.
22.
CuetosF. (1993). Writing processes in a shallow orthography. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, 17–28.
23.
De MauroT. (1989). VELI. Vocabolario elettronico della lingua Italiana [VELI. Electronic dictionary of Italian language]. Milano: IBM Italia.
24.
DefiorS.AlegríaJ.TitosR.MartosF. (2008). Using morphology when spelling in a shallow orthographic system: The case of Spanish. Cognitive Development, 23, 204–215.
25.
FernandesS.VenturaP.QueridoL.MoraisJ. (2008). Reading and spelling acquisition in European Portuguese: A preliminary study. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 805–821.
26.
FolkJ. R.RappB. (2004). Interaction of lexical and sublexical information in spelling: Evidence from nonword spelling. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 565–585.
27.
HillisA.CaramazzaA. (1991). Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit. Brain and Language, 40, 106–144.
28.
HoughtonG.ZorziM. (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 115–162.
29.
KaminskaZ. (2003). Little Frog and Toad: Interaction of orthography and phonology in Polish spelling. Reading and Writing, 16, 61–80.
30.
LehtonenA.BryantP. (2005). Active players or just passive bystanders? The role of morphemes in spelling development in a transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics, 26, 137–155.
31.
LuzzattiC.LaiaconaM.AllamanoN.De TantiA.InzaghiM. G. (1998). Writing disorders in Italian aphasic patients: A multiple single-case study of dysgraphia in a language with shallow orthography. Brain, 121, 1721–1734.
32.
MarconiL.OttM.PesentiE.RattiD.TavellaM. (1993). Lessico elementare: Dati statistici sull’italiano scritto e letto dai bambini delle elementari [Elementary lexicon: Statistical data for Italian written and read by elementary school children]. Bologna: Zanichelli.
33.
MarinelliC. V.RomaniC.BuraniC.ZoccolottiP. (2015). Spelling acquisition in English and Italian: A cross-linguistic study. Frontiers in Psychology, Section Educational Psychology, 6, article no. 1843.
34.
MartinetC.ValdoisS.FayolM. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of literacy acquisition. Cognition, 91, B11–B22.
35.
NigroL.Jiménez-FernándezG.SimpsonI. C.DefiorS. (2015). Implicit learning of written regularities and its relation to literacy acquisition in a shallow orthography. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 571–585.
36.
NotarnicolaA.AngelelliP.JudicaA.ZoccolottiP. (2012). The development of spelling skills in a shallow orthography: The case of Italian language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 1171–1194.
37.
PactonS.BorchardtG.TreimanR.LétéB.FayolM. (2014). Learning to spell from reading: General knowledge about spelling patterns influences memory for specific words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 1019–1036.
38.
PactonS.DeaconS. H. (2008). The timing and mechanisms of children’s use of morphological information in spelling: A review of evidence form English and French. Cognitive Development, 23, 339–359.
39.
PactonS.FayolM.PerruchetP. (2002). The acquisition of untaught orthographic regularities in French. In VerhoevenL.ElbroC.ReitsmaP. (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 121–136). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
40.
PactonS.PerruchetP.FayolM.CleeremansA. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 401–426.
41.
PactonS.SobacoA.FayolM.TreimanR. (2013). How does graphotactic knowledge influence children’s learning of new spellings?Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–10.
42.
PaiziD.ZoccolottiP.BuraniC. (2011). Lexical stress assignment in Italian developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 24, 443–461.
43.
PattersonK. E. (1986). Lexical but nonsemantic spelling?. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3, 341–367.
44.
PerryC.ZieglerJ. C. (2004). Beyond the two-strategy model of skilled spelling: Effects of consistency, grain size, and orthographic redundancy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 325–356.
45.
PerryC.ZieglerJ. C.ColtheartM. (2002). A dissociation between orthographic awareness and spelling production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 43–73.
46.
PrunetiC. A.FenuA.FreschiG.RotaS.CocciD.MarchionniM.… MurratorioG. (1996). Aggiornamento alla standardizzazione italiana del test delle Matrici Progressive Colorate di Raven (CPM) [Update of the Italian standardization of Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices]. Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 217, 51–57.
47.
RappB.EpsteinC.TainturierM. J. (2002). The integration of information across lexical and sublexical processes in spelling. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19, 1–29.
48.
SeidenbergM. S. (1997). Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science, 275, 1599–1603.
49.
SobacoA.TreimanR.PeeremanR.BorchardtG.PactonS. (2015). The influence of graphotactic knowledge on adults’ learning of spelling. Memory & Cognition, 43, 593–604.
50.
Sprenger-CharollesL.ColéP.SerniclaesW. (2006). Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia. Hove: Psychology Press.
51.
SulpizioS.ColomboL. (2013). Lexical stress, frequency and stress neighborhood effects in the early stages of Italian reading development. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2073–2084.
52.
TainturierM. J.BosseM. L.RobertsD. J.ValdoisS.RappB. (2013). Lexical neighborhood effects in pseudoword spelling. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–8.
53.
TainturierM. J.RappB. (2001). The spelling process. In RappB. (Ed.), What deficits reveal about the human mind: A handbook of cognitive neuropsychology (pp. 263–289). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
54.
TreimanR. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first-grade children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
TreimanR.CassarA. G. (1997). Spelling acquisition in English. In PerfettiC.RiebenL.FayolM. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
TreimanR.KesslerB. (2006). Spelling as statistical learning: Using consonantal context to spell vowels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 642–652.
57.
WimmerH.LanderlK. (1997). How learning to spell German differs from learning to spell English. In PerfettiC. A.RiebenL.FayolM. (Eds.), Learning to spell: Research, theory and practice across languages (pp. 81–96). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
