Three eye-movement experiments were conducted to examine how the complexity of characters in Chinese words (i.e., number of strokes per character) influences their processing and eye-movement behaviour. In Experiment 1, English speakers with no significant knowledge of Chinese searched for specific low-, medium-, and high-complexity target characters in a multi-page narrative containing characters of varying complexity (3–16 strokes). Fixation durations and skipping rates were influenced by the visual complexity of both the target characters and the characters being searched even though participants had no knowledge of Chinese. In Experiment 2, native Chinese speakers performed the same character-search task, and a similar pattern of results was observed. Finally, in Experiment 3, a second sample of native Chinese speakers read the same text used in Experiments 1 and 2, with text characters again exhibiting complexity effects. These results collectively suggest that character-complexity effects on eye movements may not be due to lexical processing per se but may instead reflect whatever visual processing is required to know whether or not a character corresponds to an episodically represented target. The theoretical implications of this for our understanding of normal reading are discussed.
BaiX.YanG.LiversedgeS. P.ZangC.RaynerK. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277–1287. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1277
2.
ChangR.ChangM. S. (1978). Speaking of Chinese. New York, NY: Norton & Co.
3.
Chinese Character Information Dictionary (Hanzi Xinxi Zidian). (1988). Beijing: Science Press.
4.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
5.
DavisC. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–758. doi:10.1037/a0019738
6.
EngbertR.NuthmannA.RichterE. M.KlieglR. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777
7.
HautalaJ.HyönäJ.AroM. (2011). Dissociating spatial and letter-based word length effects observed in readers’ eye movement patterns. Vision Research, 51, 1719–1727. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.05.015
8.
LiversedgeS. P.DriegheD.LiX.YanG.BaiX.HyönäJ. (2016). Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.10.013
9.
LiversedgeS. P.ZangC.ZhangM.BaiX.YanG.DriegheD. (2014). The effect of visual complexity and word frequency on eye movements during Chinese reading. Visual Cognition, 22, 441–457. doi:10.1080/13506285.2014.889260
10.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
11.
McConkieG. W.ZolaD. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 221–224. doi:10.3758/BF03202990
12.
McDonaldS. A. (2006). Effects of number-of-letters on eye movements during reading are independent from effects of spatial word length. Visual Cognition, 13, 89–98. doi:10.1080/13506280500143367
13.
PerfettiC. A.LiuY.TanL. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.43
14.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56
15.
RaynerK.FischerM. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734–747. doi:10.3758/BF03213106
16.
RaynerK.FisherD. L. (1987a). Eye movements and the perceptual span during visual search. In O’ReganJ. K.Levy-SchoenA. A. (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 293–302). New York, NY, USA: Elsevier Science.
17.
RaynerK.FisherD. L. (1987b). Letter processing during eye fixations in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 87–100. doi:10.3758/BF03211517
18.
RaynerK.LiX.JuhaszB. J.YanG. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089–1093. doi:10.3758/BF03206448
19.
RaynerK.LiX.WilliamsC. C.CaveK. R.WellA. D. (2007). Eye movements during information processing tasks: Individual differences and cultural effects. Vision Research, 47, 2714–2726. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.007
20.
RaynerK.McConkieG. W.ZolaD. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–226. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90009-2
21.
RaynerK.PollatsekA. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351–373. doi:10.1080/14640748108400798
22.
ReichleE. D.PollatsekA.FisherD. L.RaynerK. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in Reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–157. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.125
23.
ReichleE. D.PollatsekA.RaynerK. (2012). Using E-Z reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye–mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–185. doi:10.1037/a0026473
24.
SchadD. J.EngbertR. (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text Reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391–421. doi:10.1080/13506285.2012.670143
25.
TownsendJ. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168–199. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1972.tb00490.x
26.
WhitneyC. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
27.
YanG.TianH.BaiX.RaynerK. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259–268. doi:10.1348/000712605X70066
28.
YangH. M.McConkieG. W. (1999). Reading Chinese: Some basic eye-movement characteristics. In ChenH.-C. (Ed.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 207–222). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29.
YuL.ReichleE. D.JonesM.LiversedgeS. P. (2015). Radicallocator: A software tool for identifying the radicals in Chinese characters. Behavior Research Methods, 47, 826–836. doi:10.3758/s13428-014-0505-8
30.
ZangC.LiversedgeS. P.BaiX.YanG. (2011). Eye movements during Chinese reading. In GilchristI.EverlingS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 961–978). Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
