We aimed to resolve an apparent contradiction between previous experiments from different laboratories, using dual-task methodology to compare effects of a concurrent executive load on immediate recognition memory for colours or shapes of items or their colour–shape combinations. Results of two experiments confirmed previous evidence that an irrelevant attentional load interferes equally with memory for features and memory for feature bindings. Detailed analyses suggested that previous contradictory evidence arose from limitations in the way recognition memory was measured. The present findings are inconsistent with an earlier suggestion that feature binding takes place within a multimodal episodic buffer Baddeley, (2000) and support a subsequent account in which binding takes place automatically prior to information entering the episodic buffer Baddeley, Allen, & Hitch, (2011). Methodologically, the results suggest that different measures of recognition memory performance (A′, d′, corrected recognition) give a converging picture of main effects, but are less consistent in detecting interactions. We suggest that this limitation on the reliability of measuring recognition should be taken into account in future research so as to avoid problems of replication that turn out to be more apparent than real.
AllenR.J.BaddeleyA.D.HitchG.J. (2006). Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 298–313.
2.
AllenR.J.HitchG.J.BaddeleyA.D. (2009). Cross-modal binding and working memory.Visual Cognition, 17, 83–102.
3.
Alvarez & Cavanagh, 2009.
4.
AlvarezG.A.ThompsonT.W. (2009). Overwriting and rebinding: Why feature-switch detection tasks underestimate the binding capacity of visual working memory.Visual Cognition, 17, 141–159.
5.
AwhE.BartonB.VogelE.K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity.Psychological Science, 18, 7622–628.
6.
BaddeleyA.D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 11417–423.
7.
BaddeleyA.D.AllenR.J.HitchG.J. (2011). Binding in visual working memory: The role of the episodic buffer.Neuropsychologia, 49, 1393–1400.
8.
BaddeleyA.D.HitchG.J. (1974). Working memory.The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, BowerG.A.New York, NYAcademic Press8, 47–89.
9.
Brockmole, J. R., Parra, M. A., Della Sala, S., & Logie, R. H. (2008). Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 543–547.
10.
BrownL.A.BrockmoleJ.R. (2010). The role of attention in binding visual features in working memory: Evidence from cognitive ageing.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2067–2079.
11.
Dell'Acqua, R., & Jolicoeur, P. (2000). Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference. Memory & Cognition, 28, 184–191.
12.
DelvenneJ.-F.BruyerR. (2004). Does visual short-term memory store bound features?.Visual Cognition, 11, 1–27.
13.
DelvenneJ.-F.CleeremansA.LaloyauxC. (2010). Feature bindings are maintained in visual short-term memory without sustained focused attention.Experimental Psychology, 57, 2108–116.
14.
DelvenneJ.-F.DentK. (2008). Distinctive shapes benefit short-term memory for associations, not colors.Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 61024–1031.
15.
DuncanJ. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 4501–517.
16.
ElsleyJ.V.ParmentierF.B. R. (2009). Is verbal–spatial binding in working memory impaired by a concurrent memory load?.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 91696–1705.
17.
FougnieD.AsplundC.L.MaroisR. (2010). What are the units of storage in visual working memory?.Journal of Vision, 10, 12271–11.
18.
FougnieD.MaroisR. (2009). Attentive tracking disrupts feature binding in visual working memory.Visual Cognition, 17, 48–66.
19.
GajewskiD.A.BrockmoleJ.R. (2006). Feature bindings endure without attention: Evidence from an explicit recall task.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 581–587.
20.
GorgoraptisN.CatalaoR.F. G.BaysP.M.HusainM. (2011). Dynamic updating or working memory resources for visual objects.The Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 238502–8511.
21.
HommelB.ColzatoL.S. (2009). When an object is more than a binding of its features: Evidence for two mechanisms of visual feature integration.Visual Cognition, 17, 1/2120–140.
22.
HyunJ.WoodmanG.F.VogelE.K.HollingworthA.LuckS.J. (2009). The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 41140–1160.
23.
JohnsonJ.S.HollingworthA.LuckS.J. (2008). The role of attention in the maintenance of feature bindings in visual short-term memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 34, 41–55.
24.
KarlsenP.J.AllenR.J.BaddeleyA.D.HitchG.J. (2010). Binding across space and time in visual working memory.Memory and Cognition, 38, 292–303.
25.
LogieR.H.BrockmoleJ.R.VandenbrouckeA.R. E. (2009). Bound feature combinations in visual short-term memory are fragile but influence long-term learning.Visual Cognition, 17, 160–179.
26.
LuckS.J.VogelE.K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions.Nature, 390, 279–281.
27.
McNicolD. (1972). A primer of signal detection theory, London, UKGeorge Allen & Unwin.
28.
Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Mather, M., & D'Esposito, M. (2000). Aging and reflective processes of working memory: binding and test load deficits. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 527–541.
29.
MoreyC.C. (2011). Maintaining binding in working memory: Comparing the effects of intentional goals and incidental affordances.Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 920–927.
30.
MoreyC.C.CowanN. (2004). When visual and verbal memories compete: Evidence of cross-domain limits in working memory.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 296–301.
31.
MoreyC.C.CowanN. (2005). When do visual and verbal memory conflict? The importance of working memory load and retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 703–713.
PastoreR.E.CrawleyE.J.BerensM.S.SkellyM.A. (2003). “Nonparametric” A′ and other modern misconceptions about signal detection theory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 3556–569.
36.
PollackI.NormanD.A. (1964). A non-parametric analysis of recognition memory.Psychonomic Science, 1, 125–126.
37.
SnodgrassJ.G.CorwinJ. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34–50.
38.
Song, J-H., & Jiang, Y. (2006). Visual working memory for simple and complex features: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 30, 963–972.
39.
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
40.
Stevanovski, B., & Jolicoeur, P. (2007). Visual short-term memory: Central capacity limitations in short-term consolidation. Visual Cognition, 15, 532–563.
41.
UenoT.AllenR.J.BaddeleyA.D.HitchG.J.SaitoS. (2011). Disruption of visual feature binding in working memory.Memory & Cognition, 39, 12–23.
42.
UenoT.MateJ.AllenR.J.HitchG.J.BaddeleyA.D. (2011). What goes through the gate? Exploring interference with visual feature binding.Neuropsychologia, 49, 1597–1604.
VogelE.K.WoodmanG.F.LuckS.J. (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 192–114.
45.
WheelerM.E.TreismanA.M. (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 48–64.
46.
WoodmanG.F.VogelE.K. (2008). Selective storage and maintenance of an object's features in visual working memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1223–229.
47.
XuY. (2002). Encoding color and shape from different parts of an object in visual short-term memory.Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 81260–1280.
48.
XuY. (2006). Understanding the object benefit in visual short-term memory: The roles of feature proximity and connectedness.Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 5815–828.
49.
YehY.Y.YangC.T.ChiuY.C. (2005). Binding or prioritization: The role of selective attention in visual short-term memory.Visual Cognition, 12, 5759–799.
