This study investigated the role of attentional resources in processing emotional faces in working memory (WM). Participants memorised two face arrays with the same emotion but different identities and were required to judge whether the test face had the same identity as one of the previous faces. Concurrently during encoding and maintenance, a sequence of high- or low-pitched tones (high load) or white noise bursts (low load) was presented, and participants were required to count how many low-tones were heard. Experiments 1 and 2 used an emotional and neutral test face, respectively. The results revealed a significant WM impairment for sad and angry faces in the high-load versus low-load condition but not for happy faces. In Experiment 1, participants remembered happy faces better than other emotional faces. In contrast, Experiment 2 showed that performance was poorer for happy than sad faces but not for angry faces. This evidence suggests that depleting attentional resources has less impact on WM for happy faces than other emotional faces, but also that differential effects on WM for emotional faces depend on the presence or absence of emotion in the probe face at retrieval.
AcunzoD.MacKenzieG.van RossumM. C. (2019). Spatial attention affects the early processing of neutral versus fearful faces when they are task-irrelevant: A classifier study of the EEG C1 component. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 19(1), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-00650-7
2.
AtkinsonA. P.TipplesJ.BurtD. M.YoungA. W. (2005). Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1199–1213. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193553
3.
BaddeleyA. D.AndradeJ. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.126
4.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Oxford University Press. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1
5.
BeckA. T.EpsteinN.BrownG.SteerR. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56(6), 893–897. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.56.6.893
BeckerD. V.AndersonU. S.MortensenC. R.NeufeldS. L.NeelR. (2011). The face in the crowd effect unconfounded: Happy faces, not angry faces, are more efficiently detected in single- and multiple-target visual search tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 637–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024060
8.
BeckerD. V.NeelR.SrinivasanN.NeufeldS.KumarD.FouseS. (2012). The vividness of happiness in dynamic facial displays of emotion. PLOS ONE, 7(1), Article e26551. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026551
9.
BeckerD. V.SrinivasanN. (2014). The vividness of the happy face. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3), 189–194. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414533702
10.
CalvoM. G.AveroP.Fernández-MartínA.RecioG. (2016). Recognition thresholds for static and dynamic emotional faces. Emotion, 16(8), 1186–1200. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000192
ChenW.LiuC. H.LiH.TongK.RenN.FuX. (2015). Facial expression at retrieval affects recognition of facial identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 780. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00780
13.
CurbyK. M.SmithS. D.MoerelD.DysonA. (2019). The cost of facing fear: Visual working memory is impaired for faces expressing fear. British Journal of Psychology, 110(2), 428–448. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12324
14.
D’ArgembeauA.Van der LindenM. (2011). Influence of facial expression on memory for facial identity: Effects of visual features or emotional meaning?Emotion, 11(1), 199–202. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022592
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
17.
Feldmann-WüstefeldT.Schmidt-DaffyM.SchuböA. (2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 697–707. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01130.x
18.
GanelT.Goshen-GottsteinY. (2004). Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: The parallel-route hypothesis revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(3), 583–597. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.3.583
19.
GoelevenE.De RaedtR.LeymanL.VerschuereB. (2008). The Karolinska directed emotional faces: A validation study. Cognition and Emotion, 22(6), 1094–1118. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699930701626582
20.
GuptaR.SrinivasanN. (2014). Only irrelevant sad but not happy faces are inhibited under high perceptual load. Cognition and Emotion, 29(4), 747–754. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.933735
21.
HermansD.CrombezG.EelenP. (2000). Automatic attitude activation and efficiency: The fourth horseman of automaticity. Psychologica Belgica, 40(1), 3–22. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2000-15711-001
22.
HolmesA.MoggK.de FockertJ.NielsenM. K.BradleyB. P. (2014). Electrophysiological evidence for greater attention to threat when cognitive control resources are depleted. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0212-4
23.
HuangS. L.ChangY. C.ChenY. J. (2011). Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources. Emotion, 11(3), 544–552. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0022763
24.
JacksonM. C.LindenD. E.RaymondJ. E. (2012). “Distracters” do not always distract: Visual working memory for angry faces is enhanced by incidental emotional words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 437. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00437
25.
JacksonM. C.LindenD. E. J.RaymondJ. E. (2014). Angry expressions strengthen the encoding and maintenance of face identity representations in visual working memory. Cognition and Emotion, 28(2), 278–297. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2013.816655
26.
JacksonM. C.RaymondJ. E. (2008). Familiarity enhances visual working memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(3), 556–568. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.3.556
27.
JacksonM. C.WolfC.JohnstonS. J.RaymondJ. E.LindenD. E. J. (2008). Neural correlates of enhanced visual short-term memory for angry faces: An fMRI study. PLOS ONE, 3(10), Article e3536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003536
28.
JacksonM. C.WuC.-Y.LindenD. E. J.RaymondJ. E. (2009). Enhanced visual short-term memory for angry faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(2), 363–374. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0013895
29.
JuthP.LundqvistD.KarlssonA.ÖhmanA. (2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5(4), 379–395. http://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.379
LeeH. J.ChoY. S. (2019). Memory facilitation for emotional faces: Visual working memory trade-offs resulting from attentional preference for emotional facial expressions. Memory and Cognition, 47, 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00930-8
32.
LeymanL.De RaedtR.SchachtR.KosterE. H. (2007). Attentional biases for angry faces in unipolar depression. Psychological Medicine, 37(3), 393–402. http://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170600910X
33.
LimS. L.BruceA. S.AupperleR. L. (2014). The influence of a working memory task on affective perception of facial expressions. PLOS ONE, 9(10), Article e111074. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111074
34.
MacNamaraA.FerriJ.HajcakG. (2011). Working memory load reduces the late positive potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3), 321–331. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0036-z
35.
MiendlarzewskaE. A.Van ElswijkG.CannistraciC. V.van EeR. (2013). Working memory load attenuates emotional enhancement in recognition memory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 112. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00112
36.
NummenmaaL.CalvoM. G. (2015). Dissociation between recognition and detection advantage for facial expressions: A meta-analysis. Emotion, 15(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000042
37.
PecchinendaA.HeilM. (2007). Role of working memory load on selective attention to affectively valent information. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440601095388
PessoaL.KastnerS.UngerleiderL. G. (2002). Attentional control of the processing of neutral and emotional stimuli. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(1), 31–45. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00214-8
40.
PessoaL.McKennaM.GutierrezE.UngerleiderL. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(17), 11458–11463. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.172403899
41.
PessoaL.PadmalaS.MorlandT. (2005). Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation. NeuroImage, 28(1), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.048
42.
PhelpsE. A.LingS.CarrascoM. (2006). Emotion facilitates perception and potentiates the perceptual benefits of attention. Psychological Science, 17(4), 292–299. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01701.x
43.
PlancherG.MassolS.DorelT.ChainayH. (2019). Effect of negative emotional content on attentional maintenance in working memory. Cognition and Emotion, 33(7), 1489–1496. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1561420
44.
PollakS. D.CicchettiD.HornungK.ReedA. (2000). Recognizing emotion in faces: Developmental effects of child abuse and neglect. Developmental Psychology, 36(5), 679–688. http://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.36.5.679
45.
PottageC. L.SchaeferA. (2012). Visual attention and emotional memory: Recall of aversive pictures is partially mediated by concurrent task performance. Emotion, 12(1), 33–38. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0024574
46.
SchweizerS.SatputeA. B.AtzilS.FieldA. P.HitchcockC.BlackM.BarretL. F.DalgleishT. (2019). The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 145(6), 566–609. http://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000193
47.
SessaP.LuriaR.GotlerA.JolicœurP.Dell’AcquaR. (2011). Interhemispheric ERP asymmetries over inferior parietal cortex reveal differential visual working memory maintenance for fearful versus neutral facial identities. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 187–197. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01046.x
48.
ShawK.LienM. C.RuthruffE.AllenP. A. (2011). Electrophysiological evidence of emotion perception without central attention. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(6), 695–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.586624
49.
SilviaP. J.AllanW. D.BeauchampD. L.MaschauerE. L.WorkmanJ. O. (2006). Biased recognition of happy facial expressions in social anxiety. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25(6), 585–602. http://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.6.585
50.
SimioneL.CalabreseL.MarucciF. S.BelardinelliM. O.RaffoneA.MaratosF. A. (2014). Emotion based attentional priority for storage in visual short-term memory. PLOS ONE, 9(5), Article e95261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095261
51.
SnodgrassJ. G.CorwinJ. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117(1), 34–50. http://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.117.1.34
52.
SpotornoS.EvansM.JacksonM. C. (2018). Remembering who was where: A happy expression advantage for face identity-location binding in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(9), 1365–1383. http://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000522
53.
SrinivasanN.GuptaR. (2010). Emotion-attention interactions in recognition memory for distractor faces. Emotion, 10(2), 207–215. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0018487
54.
SrivastavaP.SrinivasanN. (2010). Time course of visual attention with emotional faces. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(2), 369–377. http://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.2.369
55.
TalmiD.AndersonA. K.RiggsL.CaplanJ. B.MoscovitchM. (2008). Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures. Learning & Memory, 15(3), 172–182. http://doi.org/10.1101/lm.722908
56.
TammG.KreegipuuK.HarroJ.CowanN. (2017). Updating schematic emotional facial expressions in working memory: Response bias and sensitivity. Acta Psychologica, 172, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.002
57.
ThomasP. M. J.JacksonM. C.RaymondJ. E. (2014). A threatening face in the crowd: Effects of emotional singletons on visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(1), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033970
58.
TomasikD.RuthruffE.AllenP. A.LienM. C. (2009). Nonautomatic emotion perception in a dual-task situation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 282–288. http://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.282
Van DillenL. F.DerksB. (2012). Working memory load reduces facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP study. Emotion, 12(6), 1340–1349. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0028624
61.
Van DillenL. F.KooleS. L. (2009). How automatic is “automatic vigilance”? The role of working memory in attentional interference of negative information. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930802338178
62.
WangZ.BovikA. C.SheikhH. R.SimoncelliE. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861
63.
YankouskayaA.BoothD. A.HumphreysG. (2012). Interactions between facial emotion and identity in face processing: Evidence based on redundancy gains. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74(8), 1692–1711. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0345-5
64.
YatesA.AshwinC.FoxE. (2010). Does emotion processing require attention? The effects of fear conditioning and perceptual load. Emotion, 10(6), 822–830. http://doi.org/10.1037/a0020325
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
