An experiment was carried out to test the hypothesis that performance on a task which involves a shift of attention between spatially separated sources would be lower under noise conditions than one which involved no such shift. The results indicated that the hypothesis was not proved; rather they showed that the subject's performance on the shift of attention task was better under noise than under quiet. An attempt is made to put forward possible reasons for this occurrence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BakanP. (1957). Extroversion-introversion and improvement in an auditory vigilance task M.R.C., APU Rep., 311/57.
2.
BroadbentD. E. (1953). Noise, paced performance, and vigilance tasks. Brit. J. Psychol.44, 295–303.
3.
BroadbentD. E. (1954). Some effects of noise on visual performance. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.6, 1–5.
4.
BroadbentD. E. (1958a). Perception and Communication.London.
5.
BroadbentD. E. (1958b). Effect of noise on an “intellectual” task. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.30, 824–7.
6.
JerisonH. J. (1954). Paced performance on a complex counting task under noise and fatigue conditions. Amer. Psychologist9, 399.
7.
JerisonH. J. (1957). Performance on a simple vigilance task in noise and quiet. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.29, 1163–5.
8.
JerisonH. J.WingS. (1957). Effects of noise and fatigue on a complex vigilance task57–14Wright Air Development Center Tech. Rep.
9.
McBainW. N. (1961). Noise, the “arousal hypothesis,” and monotonous work. J. appl. Psychol.45, 309–17.
10.
WoodheadM. M. (1959). Effect of brief loud noise on decision making. J. acoust. Soc. Amer.31, 1329–31.
