Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Following previous experiments on the effect of suprathreshold “warning” signals in lowering the threshold for stimuli in another modality, we have used visual “warning” signals which are themselves within the threshold range. These near threshold “warnings” appear to act in exactly the same way as suprathreshold “warnings” provided they are seen. Very weak “warnings” have a reduced effect, probably because they are not always seen. The experiment is of interest in that it supports the theory that the effect is due to the “warning” signal reducing the subject's uncertainty about when the threshold stimulus will occur, and secondly because it indicates that under these conditions at least, the subject can attend effectively to two simultaneous near-threshold stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Broadbent

D. E.

(1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychol. Rev. 64, 205–15.

Collier

(1954). Probability of response and intertrial association as functions of monocular and binocular stimulation. J. exp. Psychol. 47, 75–83.

Finney

D. J.

(1952). Probit Analysis London.

Gregg

L. W.

Brogden

W. J.

(1952). The effect of simultaneous visual stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol. 43, 179–86.

Howarth

C. I.

Treisman

(1958a). The effect of warning intervals on the electric phosphene and auditory thresholds. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 10, 130–41.

Howarth

C. I.

Treisman

(1958b). Lowering of an auditory threshold produced by a light signal occurring after the threshold stimulus. Nature 182, 1093–4.

Loveless

N. E.

(1957). Signal detection with simultaneous visual and auditory presentation. F.P.R.C. 1027 Report to the Flying Personnel Research Committee, Air Ministry.

Pauli

(1924). Experimental Psychology Woodworth

R. S.

Schlosberg

London 1955.

Pirenne

N. J.

(1943). Binocular and uniocular thresholds of vision. Nature 152, 698.

10.

Smith

M. H.

Licklider

J. C. R.

(1949). Statistical bias in comparisons of monaural and binaural thresholds; binaural summation or binaural supplementation. Psychol. Bull. 46, 278–84.

11.

Thompson

R. F.

Voss

J. F.

Brogden

W. J.

(1958). Effect of brightness of simultaneous visual stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol. 55, 45–50.

12.

Treisman

Howarth

C. I.

(1959). Changes in threshold level produced by a signal preceding or following the threshold stimulus. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 11, 129–42.

13.

Welford

A. T.

(1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance—a review and a theory. Brit. J. Psychol. 43, 2–19.

Lowering of an Auditory Threshold by a near Threshold Warning Signal

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References