Repetition priming, the facilitation observed when a target is preceded by an identity prime, is a robust phenomenon that occurs across a variety of conditions. Oliphant (1983), however, failed to observe repetition priming for targets embedded in the instructions to an experiment in a subsequent lexical decision task. In the present experiments, we examined the roles of priming context (list or instructions), target lexicality, and target frequency in both lexical decision and episodic recognition performance. Initial encoding context did not modulate priming in lexical decision or recognition memory for low-frequency targets or nonwords, whereas context strongly modulated episodic recognition for high-frequency targets. The results indicate that priming across contexts is sensitive to the distinctiveness of the trace and the reliance on episodic retrieval mechanisms. These results also shed light on the influence of event boundaries, such that priming occurs across different events for relatively distinct (low-frequency) items.
AdelmanJ. S.BrownG. D. A.QuesadaJ. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word naming and lexical decision times.Psychological Science17, 814–823.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). A spreading activation theory of memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior22, 261–295.
3.
AndersonM. C.NeelyJ. H. (1996). Interference and inhibition in memory retrieval.Memory. BjorkE. L.BjorkR. A.San Diego, CA: Academic Press237–313.
4.
BalotaD. A.ChumbleyJ. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 340–357.
5.
BalotaD. A.ChumbleyJ. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Access and/or production?.Journal of Memory and Language24, 89–106.
6.
BalotaD. A.SpielerD. H. (1999). Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General128, 32–55.
7.
BalotaD. A.YapM. J.CorteseM. J.HutchisonK. I.KesslerB.LoftisB. (2007). The English Lexicon Project.Behavior Research Methods39, 445–459.
8.
BlaxtonT. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 657–668.
9.
BodnerG. E.LindsayD. S. (2003). Remembering and knowing in context.Journal of Memory and Language48, 563–580.
10.
BowersJ. S. (2000). In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review7, 83–99.
11.
ChumbleyJ. I.BalotaD. A. (1984). A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory and Cognition12, 590–606.
12.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review82, 407–428.
13.
ColomboL.PasiniM.BalotaD. A. (2006). Dissociating the influence of familiarity and meaningfulness from word frequency in naming and lexical decision performance.Memory & Cognition34, 1312–1324.
14.
ColtheartM.DavelaarE.JonassonJ.BesnerD. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon.Attention and Performance VI. DornicS.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates535–555.
15.
CrissA. H.MalmbergK. J. (2008). Evidence in favor of the early-phase elevated-attention hypothesis: The effects of letter frequency and object frequency.Journal of Memory and Language59, 331–345.
16.
DellG. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.Psychological Review93, 283–321.
17.
DuchekJ. M.NeelyJ. H. (1989). A dissociative word-frequency×levels-of-processing interaction in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.Memory & Cognition17, 148–162.
18.
DurgunogluA. Y.NeelyJ. H. (1987). On obtaining episodic priming in a lexical decision task following paired-associate learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition13, 206–222.
19.
Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H. & Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 777–799.
20.
ForsterK. I.DavisC. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition10, 680–698.
21.
FranksJ. J.BilbreyC. W.LienK. G.McNamaraT. P. (2000). Transfer-appropriate processing and repetition priming.Memory & Cognition28, 1140–1151.
22.
HornerA. J.HensonR. N. (2009). Bindings between stimuli and multiple response codes dominate long-lag repetition priming in speeded classification tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition35, 757–779.
23.
JacobyL. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition9, 21–38.
24.
JacobyL. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory and Language30, 513–541.
25.
JacobyL. L.DallasM. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General110, 306–340.
26.
KinoshitaS. (2001). The role of involuntary aware memory in the implicit stem and fragment completion tasks: A selective review.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 58–69.
27.
KolersP. A. (1976). Reading a year later.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory2, 554–565.
28.
KurbyC. A.ZacksJ. M. (2008). Segmentation in the perception and memory of events.Trends in Cognitive Sciences12, 72–79.
29.
LevyB. A.KirsnerK. (1989). Reprocessing text: Indirect measures of word and message level processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 407–417.
30.
LoganG. D. (1990). Repetition priming and automaticity: Common underlying mechanism?.Cognitive Psychology22, 1–35.
31.
Lund, K., & Burgess, C. (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 203–208.
32.
MacLeodC. (1989). Word context during initial exposure influences degree of priming in word fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 398–406.
33.
MacLeodC. M.MassonM. E. (2000). Taking the “text” out of context effects in repetition priming and word identification.Memory & Cognition28, 1090–1097.
34.
MassonM. E. J.BodnerG. E. (2003). A retrospective view of masked priming: Toward a unified account of masked and long-term repetition priming.Masked priming: The state of the art. KinoshitaS.LupkerS. J.New York: Psychology Press57–94.
35.
McCabeD. P.BalotaD. A. (2007). Context effects on remembering and knowing: The expectancy heuristic.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition33, 536–549.
36.
MeadeM. L.WatsonJ. M.BalotaD. A.RoedigerH. L. (2007). The roles of spreading activation and retrieval mode in producing false recognition in the DRM paradigm.Journal of Memory and Language56, 305–320.
37.
MorrisC. D.BransfordJ. D.FranksJ. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior16, 519–533.
38.
NeelyJ. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories.Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. BesnerD.HumphreysG.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates236–264.
39.
NeelyJ. H.DurgunogluA. Y. (1985). Dissociative episodic and semantic priming effects in episodic recognition and lexical decision tasks.Journal of Memory and Language24, 466–489.
40.
NicolasS. (1996). Priming of perceptual identification after word studying in coherent texts: A short report.Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition15, 309–321.
41.
NicolasS. (1998). Perceptual and conceptual priming of individual words in coherent texts.Memory6, 643–663.
42.
OliphantG. W. (1983). Repetition and recency effects in word recognition.Australian Journal of Psychology35, 393–403.
43.
RederL. M.NhuoyvanisvongA.SchunnC. D.AyersM. S.AngstadtP.HirakiK. (2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember–know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 294–320.
44.
SchnyerD. M.DobbinsI. G.NichollsL.DavisS.VerfaellieM.SchacterD. (2007). Item to decision mapping in rapid response learning.Memory & Cognition35, 1472–1482.
45.
SpeelmanC. P.SimpsonT. A.KirsnerK. (2002). The unbearable lightness of priming.Acta Psychologica111, 191–204.
46.
TenpennyP. L. (1995). Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review2, 339–363.
47.
TseC. S.NeelyJ. H. (2005). Assessing activation without source monitoring in the DRM false memory paradigm.Journal of Memory and Language53, 532–550.
48.
WagenmakersE. M.ZeelenbergR.SteyversM.ShiffrinR.RaaijmakersJ. G. W. (2004). Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision: Support for two opposing processes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A, 1191–1210.
49.
WhittleseaB. W. A.JacobyL. L. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?.Journal of Memory and Language29, 546–565.
50.
WhittleseaB. W. A.PriceJ. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect.Memory & Cognition29, 234–246.
51.
ZacksJ. M.SpeerN. K.SwallowK. M.BraverT. S.ReynoldsJ. R. (2007). Event perception: A mind/brain perspective.Psychological Bulletin133, 273–293.
52.
ZacksJ. M.TverskyB. (2001). Event structure in perception and conception.Psychological Bulletin127, 3–21.
53.
ZeelenbergR.WagenmakersE.ShiffrinR. M. (2004). Nonword repetition priming in lexical decision reverse as a function of study task and speed stress.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition30, 270–277.
