In the present study an assumption of retrieval theories of negative priming was tested. In particular, retrieval theories assume that the same underlying process causes benefits in target-to-target repetition trials and cost effects in distractor-to-target repetition trials in selection tasks in which targets are accompanied by distractor stimuli. More specifically, retrieval theories predict a negative correlation: The higher the benefit in target-to-target repetition trials is, the higher the cost effect in distractor-to-target repetition trials should be. In fact, in a study with considerable power (N = 110) and a design that allowed a confound-free detection of correlations, I observed a significant negative correlation between benefit and cost effects. This result is interpreted as evidence for a common retrieval mechanism.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AllportA. (1987). Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action.HeuerH.SandersA. FPerspectives on perception and actionHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc395–419.
3.
AllportD. A.TipperS. P.ChmielN. R.J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering.PosnerM. I.MarinO. S. M.Attention and performance XIHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc107–132.
4.
BloemR.SchmuckP. (1999). Individuelle Unterschiede bei kognitiven Hemmungsprozesse und deren Beziehung zu Aufmerksamkeitsstörungen [Individual differences in cognitive inhibition and their relation to failures of attention].Diagnostica45, 47–55.
5.
ConwayA. R. A.TuholskiS. W.ShislerR.EngleR. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition27, 1042–1050.
6.
Dalrymple-AlfordE. C.BudayrB. (1966). Examination of some aspects of the Stroop color–word test.Perceptual & Motor Skills23, 1211–1214.
7.
DriverJ.BaylisG. C. (1993). Cross-modal negative priming and Stroop-like interference in selective attention.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society31, 45–48.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods39, 175–191.
10.
FoxE. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin Review2, 145–173.
11.
FoxE.DeFockertJ. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime–probe similarity. Evidence for episodic retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5, 107–113.
12.
FringsC.WenturaD. (2006). Strategy effects counteract distractor inhibition: Negative priming with constantly absent probe distractors.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32, 854–864.
13.
FringsC.WenturaD.HoltzM. (2007). Dysphorics cannot ignore unpleasant information.Cognition and Emotion21, 1525–1534.
14.
FringsC.WührP. (2007). Prime-display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks.Memory & Cognition35, 504–513.
15.
GreenM. J.WilliamsL. M. (1999). Schizotypy and creativity as effects of reduced cognitive inhibition.Personality and Individual Differences27, 263–276.
16.
HoughtonG.TipperS. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention.DagenbachD.CarrT. H.Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and languageSan Diego, CA: Academic Press53–112.
17.
KaneM. J.MayC. P.HasherL.RahhalT.StoltzfusE. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23, 632–650.
18.
LeboeJ. P.MondorT. A.LeboeL. C. (2006). Feature mismatch effects in auditory negative priming: Interference dependent on salient aspects of prior episodes.Perception & Psychophysics68, 897–910.
19.
LeboeJ. P.WhittleseaB. W. A.MillikenB. (2005). Selective and nonselective transfer: Positive and negative priming in a multitask environment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 1001–1029.
20.
LongD. L.PratC. S. (2002). Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation.Memory & Cognition30, 294–301.
21.
MayC. P.KaneM. J.HasherL. (1995). Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin118, 35–54.
22.
MayrS.BuchnerA. (2006). Evidence for episodic retrieval of inadequate prime responses in auditory negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32, 932–943.
23.
MillikenB.JoordensS.MerikleP. M.SeiffertA. E. (1998). Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.Psychological Review105, 203–229.
24.
MillikenB.RockA. (1997). Negative priming, attention, and discriminating the present from the past.Consciousness and Cognition6, 308–327.
25.
NeillW. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 444–450.
26.
NeillW. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 1291–1305.
27.
NeumannO. (1987). Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention.HeuerH.SandersA. F.Perspectives on perception and actionHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc361–394.
28.
RothermundK.WenturaD.De HouwerJ. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus–response associations as a source of negative priming: Evidence from task switching studies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 482–495.
29.
StavridouA.FurnhamA. (1996). The relationship between psychoticism, trait-creativity and the attentional mechanism of cognitive inhibition.Personality and Individual Differences21, 143–153.
30.
TipperS. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 571–590.
31.
TipperS. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54A, 321–343.
32.
TipperS. P.BaylisG. C. (1987). Individual differences in selective attention: The relation of priming and interference to cognitive failure.Personality and Individual Differences8, 667–675.
33.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysisReading, MA: Addison Wesley.
34.
WongK. F. E. (2000). Dissociative prime–probe contextual similarity effects on negative priming and repetition priming: A challenge to episodic retrieval as a unified account on negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 1411–1422.
