In a variant of the negative priming (NP) procedure, the larger of two presented animals is to be named in each trial. Eight animals of different sizes are used, which allows a manipulation of conceptual task difficulty in terms of pair distance (difficult: one step, versus easy: three steps) on the series. Distances are varied for prime pairs and probe pairs orthogonally. NP effects were found for easy (wide) probe distances (Experiments 1 and 2) and, additionally, for easy (wide) prime distances (Experiment 2). This pattern is interpreted in terms of different theories of NP, which emphasize either forward-acting (prime to probe) or backward-acting (probe to prime) processes. The present results are most compatible with a backward-acting mechanism defined by the episodic retrieval perspective; they are less compatible with a forward-acting inhibition perspective. The results have implications for resource requirements of retrieval-based accounts of NP.
AllportD. A.TipperS. P.ChmielN. R. J. (1985). Perceptual integration and postcategorical filtering.Attention and performance. PosnerM. I.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates11, 107–132.
2.
BarghJ. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition.Handbook of social cognition. (2).. WyerR. S.SrullT. K.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates1, 1–40.
3.
ConwayA. R. A.TuholskyS. W.ShislerR. J.EngleR. W. (1999). The effect of memory load on negative priming: An individual differences investigation.Memory and Cognition27, 1042–1050.
4.
FoxE. (1995). Negative priming from ignored distractors in visual selection: A review.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review2, 145–173.
5.
FoxE.FockertJ. W. (1998). Negative priming depends on prime–probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review5, 107–113.
6.
HoughtonG.TipperS. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention.Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. DagenbachD.CarrT. H.San Diego, CA: Academic Press53–112.
7.
KaneM. J.MayC. P.HasherL.RahhalT.StoltzfusE. R. (1997). Dual mechanisms of negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23, 632–650.
8.
KlieglR.MayrU.OberauerK. (2000). Resource limitations and process dissociations in individual differences research.Generative mental processes and cognitive resources: Integrative research on adaptation and control. von HeckerU.DutkeS.SedekG.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers337–366.
9.
LavieN.FoxE. (2000). The role of perceptual load in negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 1038–1052.
10.
Leth-SteensenC.MarleyA. A. J. (2000). A model of response time effect in symbolic comparison.Psychological Review107, 62–100.
11.
LoganG. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review95, 492–527.
12.
LoweD. G. (1979). Strategies, context, and the mechanism of response inhibition.Memory & Cognition7, 382–389.
13.
MacDonaldP. A.JoordensS.SeergobinK. N. (1999). Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attention to distractors does not eliminate negative priming, it enhances it.Memory and Cognition27, 197–207.
14.
MackintoshB.MathewsA.HoldenE. (2002). Bigger than a breadbox? Attention to distractors may not enhance negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28, 1323–1329.
15.
MayC. P.KaneM. J.HasherL. (1995). Determinants of negative priming.Psychological Bulletin118, 35–54.
16.
McNamaraT. P. (1994). Priming and theories of memory: A reply to Ratcliff and McKoon.Psychological Review101, 185–187.
17.
MeyerD. E.KierasD. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms.Psychological Review104, 3–65.
18.
NavonD.GopherD. (1979). On the economy of the human processing-system.Psychological Review86, 214–255.
19.
NeelyJ. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories.Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. BesnerD.HumphreysG.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates264–336.
20.
NeillW. T. (1977). Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance3, 444–450.
21.
NeillW. T. (1997). Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 1291–1305.
22.
NeillW. T.ValdesL. A. (1992). Persistence of negative priming: Steady state or decay?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 565–576.
23.
NeumannE.DeSchepperB. G. (1991). Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 1136–1145.
24.
ParkJ.KanwisherN. (1994). Negative priming for spatial location: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 613–623.
25.
RothermundK.WenturaD.De HouwerJ. (2005). Retrieval of incidental stimulus–response associations as a source of negative priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 482–495.
26.
SedekG.von HeckerU. (2004). Effects of subclinical depression and aging on generative reasoning about linear orders: Same or different processing limitations?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General133, 237–260.
27.
TipperS. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 571–590.
28.
TipperS. P. (1992). Selection for action: The role of inhibitory mechanisms.Current Directions in Psychological Science1, 105–109.
29.
TipperS. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54A, 321–343.
30.
UnsworthN.HeitzR. P.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory in hot and cold cognition.Working memory and cognitive control in aging and psychopathology. EngleR. W.SedekG.von HeckerU.McIntoshD. N.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press19–43.
31.
WegnerD. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control.Psychological Review101, 34–52.
32.
WhittleseaB. W. A.JacobyL. (1990). Interaction of prime repetition with visual degradation: Is priming a retrieval phenomenon?.Journal of Memory and Language29, 546–565.
