The research considers the influence of choice (the possibility for the player to choose a gamble or another) and involvement (the physical interaction with the gambling device) on risk taking in gambling games and whether this influence is mediated by illusory control over the outcome of the gamble. Results of a laboratory experiment (n = 100) show that (a) although choice does increase illusory control, this influence does not translate in increased risk taking, and (b) whilst involvement does increase risk taking, this effect is not mediated by illusory control. These results are discussed in relation to problem gambling, beliefs in the deployability of personal luck, and arousal approaches to risk taking.
BreenR. B.ZuckermanM. (1999). Chasing in gambling behavior: Personality and cognitive determinants.Personality and Individual Differences27, 1097–1111.
2.
BurgerJ. M. (1991). The effects of desire for control in situations with chance determined outcomes: Gambling behaviour in lotto and bingo players.Journal of Research in Personality25, 196–204.
3.
ChauA. W.PhillipsJ. G. (1995). Effects of perceived control upon wagering and attributions in computer Blackjack.Journal of General Psychology122, 253–270.
4.
CoventryK. R.NormanA. C. (1998). Arousal, erroneous verbalizations and the illusion of control during a computer-generated gambling task.British Journal of Psychology89, 629–645.
5.
DavisD. D.SundahlI.LesboM. (2000). Illusory personal control as a determinant of bet size and type in casino craps games.Journal of Applied Social Psychology30, 1224–1242.
6.
DixonM. R. (2000). Manipulating the illusion of control: Variations in gambling as a function of perceived control over chances outcomes.Psychological Record50, 705–719.
7.
DixonM. R.HayesL. J.EbbsR. E. (1998). Engaging in illusionary control during repeated risk-taking.Psychological Reports83, 959–962.
8.
DunnD. S.WilsonT. D. (1990). When the stakes are high: A limit to the illusion control effect.Social Cognition8, 305–323.
9.
Fernandez-DuqueD.WifallT. (2007). Actor/observer asymmetry in risky decision making.Judgment and Decision Making2, 1–8.
10.
GilovichT.DouglasC. (1986). Biased evaluations of randomly determined gambling outcomes.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology22, 228–241.
11.
GinakisS.OhtsukaK. (2005). Problem gambling: An exploration of the role of global personal hopefulness, short-term gambling hope, and illusion of control beliefs.Gambling Research17, 7–16.
12.
HorswillM. S.McKennaF. P. (1999). The effect of perceived control on risk taking.Journal of Applied Social Psychology29, 378–392.
13.
LadouceurR.MayrandM. (1987). The level of involvement and the timing of betting in roulette.The Journal of Psychology121, 169–176.
14.
LadouceurR.MayrandM.DussaultR.LetarteA.TremblayJ. (1984). Illusion of control: Effect of participant's participation and implication.The Journal of Psychology117, 47–52.
15.
LangerE. J. (1975). The illusion of control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 311–328.
16.
LangerE. J.RothJ. (1975). Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32, 951–955.
17.
ManoH. (1994). Risk taking, framing effects, and affect.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes57, 38–58.
18.
MayR. K.WhelanJ. P.MeyersA. W.SteenberghT. A. (2005). Gambling-related irrational beliefs in the maintenance and modification of gambling behaviour.International Gambling Studies5, 155–167.
19.
MeyerG.HauffaB. P.SchedlowskiM.PawlakC.StadlerM. A.ExtonM. S. (2000). Casino gambling increases heart rate and salivary cortisol in regular gamblers.Biological Psychiatry48, 948–953.
20.
WohlM. J. A.EnzleM. E. (2002). Temporal orientation and perceived control as determinants of risk-taking.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin28, 1388–1397.
21.
WortmanC. B. (1975). Some determinants of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 282–294.
