The human visual system is extremely sensitive to the directions of the gazes of others. However, the mechanism underlying gaze direction perception has yet to be clarified. The primary aim of the present study is to investigate whether the relational property between the local eye region and other facial regions serves as the primary visual system cue in detecting a direct gaze. Our results showed that search efficiency was determined primarily by the gaze direction indicated by the relational property regardless of the direction indicated by the local feature information of the eye region; this was true even when the gaze directions indicated by these two types of information were conflicting. These results bolster the hypothesis that the human visual system primarily accesses socially meaningful information in searching for a deviant gaze.
CalderA. J.BeaverJ. D.WinstonJ. S.DolanR. J.JenkinsR.EgerE. (2007). Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior temporal lobule.Current Biology17, 20–25.
2.
CalderA. J.YoungA. W.KeaneJ.DeanM. (2000). Configural information in facial expression perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 527–551.
3.
CampbellR.HeywoodC. A.CoweyA.RegardM.LandistT. (1990). Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation.Neuropsychologia28, 1123–1142.
4.
ClineM. G. (1967). The perception of where a person is looking.American Journal of Psychology80, 41–50.
5.
ContyL.TijusC.HuguevilleL.CoelhoE.GeorgeN. (2006). Searching for asymmetries in the detection of gaze contact versus averted gaze under different head views: A behavioral study.Spatial Vision19, 529–545.
6.
DoiH.SawadaR.MasatakaN. (2007). The effects of eye and face inversion on the early stages of gaze direction perception: An ERP study.Brain Research1183, 83–90.
7.
DoiH.UedaK. (2007). Searching for a perceived stare in the crowd.Perception36, 773–780.
8.
EvansC. S.WenderothP.ChengK. (2000). Detection of bilateral symmetry in complex biological images.Perception29, 31–42.
9.
GibsonJ. J.PickA. D. (1963). Perception of another person's looking behavior.The American Journal of Psychology76, 386–394.
10.
HietanenJ. K. (2002). Social attention orienting integrates visual information from head and body orientation.Psychological Research66, 174–179.
11.
HoffmanE. A.HaxbyJ. V. (2000). Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception.Nature Neuroscience3, 80–84.
12.
KanwisherN.TongF.NakayamaK. (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area.Cognition68, B1–B11.
13.
LangtonS. R. H. (2000). The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53A, 825–845.
14.
LangtonS. R. H.BruceV. (1999). Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others.Visual Cognition6, 541–567.
15.
LangtonS. R. H.HoneymanH.TesslerE. (2004). The influence of head contour and nose angle on the perception of eye-gaze direction.Perception & Psychophysics66, 752–771.
16.
LevyI.HassonU.AvidanG.HendlerT.MalachR. (2001). Center-periphery organization of human object areas.Nature Neuroscience4, 533–539.
17.
MaurerD.Le GrandR.MondlochC. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing.Trends in Cognitive Sciences6, 255–260.
18.
MosconiM. W.MackP. B.McCarthyG.PelphereyK. A. (2005). Taking an “intentional stance” on eye-gaze shifts: A functional neuroimaging study of social perception in children.NeuroImage27, 247–252.
19.
PagelerN. M.MenonV.MerinN. M.EliezS.BrownW. E.ReissA. L. (2003). Effect of head orientation on gaze processing in fusiform gyrus and superior temporal suclus.NeuroImage20, 318–329.
20.
PelphreyK. A.ViolaR. J.McCarthyG. (2004). When strangers pass. Processing of mutual and averted social gaze in the superior temporal sulcus.Psychological Science15, 598–603.
21.
PerrettD. I.HietanenJ. K.OramM. W.BensonP. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B335, 23–30.
22.
PomerantzJ. R. (2003). Wholes, holes, and basic features in vision.Trends in Cognitive Sciences7, 471–473.
23.
RauschenbergerR.YantisS. (2001). Attentional capture by globally defined objects.Perception & Psychophysics63, 1250–1261.
24.
RicciardelliP.DriverJ. (2008). Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: How positive congruency effects can be reversed.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61, 491–504.
25.
SearchyJ. H.BartlettJ. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 904–915.
26.
SeyamaJ.NagayamaR. S. (2005). The effect of torso direction on the judgement of eye direction. Visual Cognition.12, 103–116.
27.
SuzukiS.CavanaghP. (1995). Facial organization blocks access to low-level features: An object inferiority effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 901–913.
28.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology12, 97–136.
29.
TreismanA. M.SoutherJ. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114, 285–310.
30.
von GrünauM.AnstonC. (1995). The detection of gaze direction: A stare-in-the-crowd effect.Perception24, 1297–1313.
31.
WilsonH. R.WilkinsonF.LinL.-M.CastilloM. (2000). Perception of head orientation.Vision Research40, 459–472.
32.
WolfeJ. M.Friedman-HillS. R. (1992). On the role of symmetry in visual search.Psychological Science3, 194–198.
33.
YoungA. W.HallawellD.HayD. C. (1987). Configural information in face perception.Perception16, 747–759.
