Spatial Memory and Explicit Knowledge: An Effect of Instruction on Representational Momentum

Abstract

Freyd (1987; Finke & Freyd, 1985) suggested that representational momentum (i.e., forward displacement in memory for the location of a moving target) is impervious to error feedback (i.e., is modular or cognitively impenetrable), but studies supporting this claim might not have allowed sufficient opportunity for learning to occur. In the experiment reported here, participants were (a) naïve regarding representational momentum, (b) informed about representational momentum but not instructed to counteract it, or (c) informed about representational momentum and instructed to counteract it. All participants exhibited significant displacement. However, participants informed about representational momentum exhibited less forward displacement than did naïve participants due to a greater tendency to respond same to probes behind the true–same position. Possible mechanisms of compensation and the notion that displacement reflects both modular (cognitively impenetrable) and nonmodular (cognitively penetrable) components are addressed.

Keywords

Representational momentum Displacement Modularity Cognitive penetrability Naïve physics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amorim

Lang

Lindinger

Mayer

Deecke

Berthoz

(2000). Modulation of spatial orientation processing by mental imagery instructions: A MEG study of representational momentum. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12, 569–582.

Courtney

J. R.

(2006). Dynamics and adaptation: Consciousness, cognitive science, and quantum mechanics. NeuroQuantology 4, 337–344.

Finke

R. A.

Freyd

J. J.

(1985). Transformations of visual memory induced by implied motions of pattern elements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11, 780–794.

Finke

R. A.

Freyd

J. J.

(1989). Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: Reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118, 403–408.

Finke

R. A.

Freyd

J. J.

Shyi

G. C. W.

(1986). Implied velocity and acceleration induce transformations of visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 175–188.

Freyd

J. J.

(1987). Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review 94, 427–438.

Freyd

J. J.

Finke

R. A.

(1984). Representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10, 126–132.

Freyd

J. J.

Jones

K. T.

(1994). Representational momentum for a spiral path. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 968–976.

Hayes

A. E.

Freyd

J. J.

(2002). Representational momentum when attention is divided. Visual Cognition 9, 8–27.

10.

Hubbard

T. L.

(1990). Cognitive representation of linear motion: Possible direction and gravity effects in judged displacement. Memory & Cognition 18, 299–309.

11.

Hubbard

T. L.

(1994). Judged displacement: A modular process?. American Journal of Psychology 107, 359–373.

12.

Hubbard

T. L.

(2005). Representational momentum and related displacements in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 822–851.

13.

Hubbard

T. L.

(2006). Bridging the gap: Possible roles and contributions of representational momentum. Psicologica 27, 1–34.

14.

Hubbard

T. L.

Bharucha

J. J.

(1988). Judged displacement in apparent vertical and horizontal motion. Perception & Psychophysics 44, 211–221.

15.

Hubbard

T. L.

Motes

M. A.

(2005). An effect of context on whether memory for initial position exhibits a Fröhlich effect or an onset repulsion effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A, 961–979.

16.

Hubbard

T. L.

Ruppel

S. E.

(2002). A possible role of naive impetus in Michotte's “launching effect”: Evidence from representational momentum. Visual Cognition 9, 153–176.

17.

Johnston

H. M.

Jones

M. R.

(2006). Higher order pattern structure influences auditory representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 2–17.

18.

Joordens

Spalek

T. M.

Razmy

van Duijn

(2004). A clockwork orange: Compensation opposing momentum in memory for location. Memory & Cognition 32, 39–50.

19.

Kerzel

(2002). A matter of design: No representational momentum without predictability. Visual Cognition 9, 66–80.

20.

Kozhevnikov

Hegarty

(2001). Impetus beliefs as default heuristics: Dissociation between explicit and implicit knowledge about motion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 439–453.

21.

Kurtz

T. E.

(1999). True BASIC: Silver Edition Reference Guide Kurtz

T. E.

West Lebanon, NH: True Basic, Inc.

22.

Lashley

K. S.

(1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. Cerebral mechanisms in behavior Jeffress

L. A.

New York: Wiley.

23.

Munger

M. P.

Solberg

J. L.

Horrocks

K. K.

Preston

A. S.

(1999). Representational momentum for rotations in depth: Effects of shading and axis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, 157–171.

24.

Neisser

(1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.

25.

Reed

C. L.

Vinson

N. G.

(1996). Conceptual effects on representational momentum. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 839–850.

26.

Verfaillie

d'Ydewalle

(1991). Representational momentum and event course anticipation in the perception of implied periodical motions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17, 302–313.