To assess the role of the subsyllabic units onset–nucleus (ON; spark) and rime (spark) in Dutch visual word recognition, we compared lexical decisions to four groups of nonwords in which the existence of ONs and rimes was orthogonally manipulated. Nonwords with existent ONs and/or rimes were rejected more slowly and less accurately. ON and rime neighbours thus influence Dutch nonword reading to the same extent. Simulations with the interactive activation model (McClelland & Rumelhart, 1981) revealed that this model with left-to-right coded representations could not replicate the effects found in the lexical decision data whereas an adapted version with representations of onset, nucleus, and coda could. Effects of the larger units ON and rime emerged from activation patterns created by the smaller units onset, nucleus, and coda.
AndrewsS. (1989). Frequency and neighbourhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition15, 802–814.
2.
AndrewsS. (1992). Frequency and neighbourhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 234–254.
3.
AndrewsS. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability.Journal of Memory and Language35, 775–800.
4.
AndrewsS. (1997). The effects of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review4, 439–461.
5.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR.GulikersL. (1995). The CELEX Lexical DatabasePhiladelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium (Release 2) [CD-ROM].
6.
BoothJ. R.PerfettiC. A. (2002). Onset and rime structure influences naming but not early word identification in children and adults.Scientific Studies of Reading6, 1–23.
7.
BowersJ. S.DavisC. J.HanleyD. A. (2005). Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a “hat” in “that”?.Journal of Memory and Language52, 131–143.
8.
BoweyJ. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading.Memory & Cognition18, 419–427.
9.
BoweyJ. A. (1993). Orthographic rime priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology46A, 247–271.
10.
CarreirasM.PereaM.GraingerJ. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 857–871.
11.
ChambersS. M. (1979). Letter and order information in lexical access.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18, 225–241.
12.
CohenJ. D.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers25, 257–271.
13.
ColtheartM.DavelaarE.JonassonJ. T.BesnerD. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon.DornicS.Attention and performance VINew York: John Wiley & Sons535–555.
14.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review108, 204–256.
15.
DavisC. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognitionSydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
16.
DavisC. J.BowersJ. S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32, 535–557.
17.
DavisC. J.TaftM. (2005). More words in the neighborhood: Interference in lexical decision due to deletion neighbors.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review12, 904–910.
18.
De MoorW.BrysbaertM. (2000). Neighbourhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths.Psychological Research63, 159–162.
19.
DerwingB. L.YoonY. B.ChoS. W. (1993). The organization of the Korean syllable: Experimental evidence.Japanese and Korean Linguistics2, 223–238.
20.
ForsterK. I.ShenD. (1996). No enemies in the neighborhood: Absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 696–713.
21.
ForsterK. I.TaftM. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighbourhood-density effects in masked form priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20, 844–863.
22.
GeudensA.SandraD. (1999). Onsets and rimes in a phonologically transparent orthography: Differences between good and poor beginning readers of Dutch.Brain and Language68, 284–290.
23.
GeudensA.SandraD. (2002). The role of the orthographic onset-rime units in Dutch beginning readers.VerhoevenL.ReitsmaP.ElbroC.Precursors of functional literacyAmsterdam: John Benjamins49–67.
24.
GeudensA.SandraD. (2003). Beyond children's implicit phonological knowledge: No support for an onset-rime structure in children's explicit phonological awareness.Journal of Memory and Language49, 157–182.
25.
GraingerJ. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming.Journal of Memory and Language29, 228–244.
26.
GraingerJ.GranierJ.-P.FarioliF.Van AsscheE.Van HeuvenW. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32, 865–884.
27.
GraingerJ.JacobsA. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review103, 518–565.
28.
GraingerJ.MuneauxM.FarioliF.ZieglerJ. C. (2005). Effects of phonological and orthographic neighbourhood density interact in visual word recognition.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58A, 981–998.
29.
GraingerJ.O'ReganJ. K.JacobsA. M.SeguiJ. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics45, 189–195.
30.
GraingerJ.SeguiJ. (1990). Neighborhood frequency effects in visual word recognition: A comparison of lexical decision and masked identification latencies.Perception & Psychophysics47, 191–198.
31.
GraingerJ.Van HeuvenW. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception.BoninP.The mental lexiconNew York: Nova Science.
32.
HuntsmanL. A.LimaS. D. (1996). Orthographic neighborhood structure and lexical access.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research25, 413–425.
33.
HuntsmanL. A.LimaS. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research31, 289–306.
34.
KesslerB.TreimanR. (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables.Journal of Memory and Language37, 295–311.
35.
KesslerB.TreimanR. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables.Journal of Memory and Language44, 592–617.
36.
MartensenM.MarisE.DijkstraT. (2000). When does inconsistency hurt? On the relation between phonological consistency effects and the reliability of sublexical units.Memory & Cognition28, 648–656.
37.
MartensenH.MarisE.DijkstraT. (2003). Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory and Language49, 375–395.
38.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review88, 375–407.
39.
PeeremanR.ContentA. (1997). Orthographic and phonological neighbourhoods in naming: Not all neighbours are equally influential in orthographic space.Journal of Memory and Language37, 382–410.
40.
PereaM.RosaE. (2000). The effects of orthographic neighborhood in reading and laboratory word identification taks: A review.Psicológica21, 327–340.
41.
PerryC.ZieglerJ. C.ZorziM. (2007). Nested incremental development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud.Psychological Review114, 273–315.
42.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review103, 56–115.
43.
SearsC. R.HinoY.LupkerS. J. (1995). Neighbourhood size and neighbourhood frequency effects in word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance21, 876–900.
44.
TreimanR.ChafetzJ. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words?.ColtheartM.Attention and performance XII: The psychology of readingHove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd281–327.
45.
TreimanR.KesslerB.BickS. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models.Cognition88, 49–78.
46.
TreimanR.MullennixJ.Bijeljac-BabicR.Richmond-WeltyE. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General124, 107–136.
47.
TreimanR.ZukowskiA. (1988). Units in reading and spelling.Journal of Memory and Language27, 466–477.
48.
WhitneyC. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review8, 221–243.
49.
ZieglerJ. C.PerryC. (1998). No more problems in Coltheart's neighbourhood: Resolving neighbourhood conflicts in the lexical decision task.Cognition68, B53–B62.
