Goal-driven modulation as a function of time in saccadic target selection

Abstract

Four experiments were performed to investigate the contribution of goal-driven modulation in saccadic target selection as a function of time. Observers were required to make an eye movement to a prespecified target that was concurrently presented with multiple nontargets and possibly one distractor. Target and distractor were defined in different dimensions (orientation dimension and colour dimension in Experiment 1), or were both defined in the same dimension (i.e., both defined in the orientation dimension in Experiment 2, or both defined in the colour dimension in Experiments 3 and 4). The identities of target and distractor were switched over conditions. Speed–accuracy functions were computed to examine the full time course of selection in each condition. There were three major results. First, the ability to exert goal-driven control increased as a function of response latency. Second, this ability depended on the specific target–distractor combination, yet was not a function of whether target and distractor were defined within or across dimensions. Third, goal-driven control was available earlier when target and distractor were dissimilar than when they were similar. It was concluded that the influence of goal-driven control in visual selection is not all or none, but is of a continuous nature.

Keywords

Dimensions Eye movements Goal-driven control Time course Visual selection

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bacon

W. F.

Egeth

H. E.

(1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 485–496.

Cheal

Lyon

D. R.

(1991). Central and peripheral precuing of forced-choice discrimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43A, 859–880.

Dosher

B. A.

(1979). Empirical approaches toinformation-processing—speed–accuracy tradeoff functions or reaction-time—reply. Acta Psychologica 43, 347–359.

Dosher

Han

S. M.

Z. L.

(2000). Time course of asymmetric visual search. Perception 29, 12–13.

Duncan

(1995). Target and nontarget grouping in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 117–120.

Duncan

Humphreys

G. W.

(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96, 433–458.

Duncan

Humphreys

G. W.

(1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 578–588.

Findlay

J. M.

(1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research 37, 617–631.

Findlay

J. M.

Gilchrist

I. D.

(1998). Eye guidance and visual search. Underwood

Eye guidance in reading, driving, and scene perception Oxford, UK: Elsevier 295–312.

10.

Folk

C. M.

Remington

R. W.

Johnston

J. C.

(1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 1030–1044.

11.

Found

Müller

H. J.

(1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception and Psychophysics 58, 88–101.

12.

Godijn

Theeuwes

(2002). Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: Evidence for a competitive integration model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 1039–1054.

13.

Hochstein

Ahissar

(2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron 36, 791–804.

14.

Joseph

J. S.

Chun

M. M.

Nakayama

(1997). Attentional requirements in a “preattentive” feature search task. Nature 387, 805–807.

15.

Kim

M. S.

Cave

K. R.

(1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1009–1023.

16.

Krummenacher

Müller

H. J.

Heller

(2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 901–917.

17.

Krummenacher

Müller

H. J.

Heller

(2002). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 1303–1322.

18.

Ludwig

C. J. H.

Gilchrist

I. D.

(2002). Stimulus-driven and goal-driven control over visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 28, 902–912.

19.

Ludwig

C. J. H.

Gilchrist

I. D.

(2003a). Goal-driven modulation of oculomotor capture. Perception & Psychophysics 65, 1243–1251.

20.

Ludwig

C. J. H.

Gilchrist

I. D.

(2003b). Target similarity affects saccade curvature away from irrelevant onsets. Experimental Brain Research 152, 60–69.

21.

McElree

Carrasco

(1999). The temporal dynamics of visual search: Evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25, 1517–1539.

22.

McSorley

Haggard

Walker

(2006). Time course of oculomotor inhibition revealed by saccade trajectory modulation. Journal of Neurophysiology 96, 1420–1424.

23.

Motter

B. C.

Belky

E. J.

(1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research 38, 1805–1815.

24.

Müller

H. J.

Heller

Ziegler

(1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 1–17.

25.

Müller

H. J.

Krummenacher

(2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective?. Visual Cognition 14, 490–513.

26.

Müller

H. J.

Krummenacher

Heller

(2004). Dimension-specific inter-trial facilitation in visual search for pop-out targets: Evidence for a top-down modulable visual short-term memory effect. Visual Cognition 11, 577–602.

27.

Müller

H. J.

Rabbitt

P. M. A.

(1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 315–350.

28.

Müller

H. J.

Reimann

Krummenacher

(2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 1021–1035.

29.

Nakayama

Mackeben

(1989). Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention. Vision Research 29, 1631–1647.

30.

Nothdurft

H. C.

(2002). Attention shifts to salient targets. Vision Research 42, 2187–1306.

31.

Nothdurft

H. C.

(2006). Salience and target selection in visual search. Visual Cognition 14, 514–542.

32.

Olivers

C. N. L.

Humphreys

G. W.

(2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 650–657.

33.

Sagi

Julesz

(1985). “Where” and “what” in vision. Science 228, 1217–1219.

34.

Schouten

J. F.

Bekker

J. A. M.

(1967). Reaction time and accuracy. Acta Psychologica 27, 143–153.

35.

Theeuwes

(1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 599–606.

36.

Theeuwes

Kramer

A. F.

Hahn

Irwin

D. E.

Zelinsky

G. J.

(1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25, 1595–1608.

37.

Tipper

S. P.

Howard

L. A.

Houghton

(2000). Behavioral consequences of selection from neural population codes. Monsell

Driver

Attention & performance XVII Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

38.

Treisman

A. M.

Gelade

(1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136.

39.

Treisman

A. M.

Sato

(1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 451–478.

40.

Tse

P. U.

Sheinberg

D. L.

Logothetis

N. K.

(2002). Fixational eye movements are not affected by abrupt onsets that capture attention. Vision Research 42, 1663–1669.

41.

van Zoest

Donk

(2004). Bottom-up and top-down control in visual search. Perception 33, 927–937.

42.

van Zoest

Donk

(2005). The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition 2, 353–375.

43.

van Zoest

Donk

(2006). Saccadic target selection as a function of time. Spatial Vision 19, 61–76.

44.

van Zoest

Donk

Theeuwes

(2004). The role of stimulus-driven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30, 746–759.

45.

Wickelgren

W. A.

(1977). Speed–accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica 41, 67–85.

46.

Williams

D. E.

Reingold

E. M.

(2001). Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8, 476–488.

47.

Williams

L. G.

(1967). The effects of target specification on objects fixated during visual search. Acta Psychologica 27, 355–360.

48.

Wolfe

J. M.

(1994). Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, 202–238.

49.

Wolfe

J. M.

Butcher

S. J.

Lee

Hyle

(2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 483–502.

50.

Wolfe

J. M.

Cave

K. R.

Franzel

S. L.

(1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 15, 419–433.

51.

Wolfe

J. M.

Horowitz

T. S.

(2004). Opinion: What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5, 495–501.

52.

Yantis

(2005). How visual salience wins the battle for awareness. Nature Neuroscience 8, 975–977.

53.

Yantis

Jonides

(1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 121–134.